You wonder why this message doesn't seem to be told by today's so-called 
"black leaders".

Obama - nothing. BLM - nothing. 

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 10:47:42 AM UTC-4, MJ wrote:
>
>
>
> *'Back When We Were Negroes' by Charles E. Richardson *Journal/Website: 
> The Macon Telegraph
> Published Date:  Sunday, July 31, 2011
>
> There was a time until the early 1960s when the terms to describe those of 
> African decent, like me ­ African-American or Black or Afro-American ­ were 
> almost unheard of.
>
> I remember a distinct conversation with a friend discussing descriptive 
> terms for ourselves in 1963 or ’64. The term “black” was just coming into 
> vogue and he didn’t like it one bit. “Call me a Negro,” he said, “but don’t 
> call me black.”
>
> Now, the word “Negro” (publications used a lower case “n”) has almost 
> become a pejorative, so I was a little surprised when my pastor, the Rev. 
> Willie Reid, used it during Thursday’s revival. “Back when we were 
> Negroes,” he said, and listed several things that were different about 
> black life in America back then.
>
> That got me to thinking. Back when we were Negroes in the 1950s, “only 9 
> percent of black families with children were headed by a single parent,” 
> according to “The Black Family: 40 Years of Lies” by Kay Hymowitz. “Black 
> children had a 52 percent chance of living with both their biological 
> parents until age 17. In 1959, “only 2 percent of black children were 
> reared in households in which the mother never married.” But now that we’re 
> African-Americans, according to Hymowitz, those odds of living with both 
> parents had “dwindled to a mere 6 percent” by the mid-1980s. And check 
> this, in Bibb County, more than 70 percent of the births in the 
> African-American community are to single mothers.
>
> Back when we were Negroes and still fighting in many parts of the country 
> for the right to vote, we couldn’t wait for the polls to open. We knew our 
> friends, family and acquaintances had died getting us the ballot. Dogs and 
> fire hoses were used to keep us away and still we came. But now that we’re 
> African-Americans, in a city of 47,000 registered ­ predominately black 
> voters ­ more than 30,000 didn’t show up at the polls July 19.
>
> Back when we were Negroes, we had names like Joshua, Aaron, Paul, Esther, 
> Melba, Cynthia and Ida. Now that we are African Americans, our names are 
> bastardized versions of alcohol from Chivas to Tequila to C(S)hardonney. 
> And chances the names have an unusual spelling.
>
> Back when we were Negroes, according to the Trust For America’s Health’s 
> “F as in Fat,” report, “only four states had diabetes rates above 6 
> percent. ... The hypertension rates in 37 states about 20 years ago were 
> more than 20 percent.”
>
> Now that we’re African-Americans, that report shows, “every state has a 
> hypertension rate of more than 20 percent, with nine more than 30 percent. 
> Forty-three states have diabetes rates of more than 7 percent, and 32 have 
> rates above 8 percent. Adult obesity rates for blacks topped 40 percent in 
> 15 states, 35 percent in 35 states and 30 percent in 42 states and 
> Washington, D.C.
>
> Back when we were Negroes, the one-room church was the community center 
> that everyone used. Now that we’re African-Americans, our churches have 
> lavish ­ compared to back-in-the-day churches ­ community centers that 
> usually sit empty because the last thing the new church wants to do is 
> invite the community in.
>
> Back when we were Negroes, we didn’t have to be convinced that education 
> was the key that opened the lock of success, but now that we’re 
> African-Americans, more than 50 percent of our children fail to graduate 
> high school. In Bibb County last year, the system had a dropout rate of 
> 53,4 percent.
>
> Back when we were Negroes, the last thing a young woman wanted to look 
> like was a harlot and a young man a thug, but now that we’re 
> African-Americans, many of our young girls dress like hootchie mamas and 
> our young boys imitate penitentiary custom and wear their pants below the 
> butt line.
>
> If I could reverse all of the above by trading the term “African-American” 
> for “Negro,” what do you think I’d do?
>
>
> *Charles E. Richardson is *The Telegraph’s
> * editorial page editor. He can be reached at (478) 744-4342 or via e-mail 
> at [email protected] <javascript:>. *This article may be cited as: 
> Richardson CE. Back when we were Negroes. Macon Telegraph. July 31, 2011. 
> Available from: 
> http://www.haciendapub.com/articles/back-when-we-were-negroes-charles-e-... 
> <http://www.haciendapub.com/articles/back-when-we-were-negroes-charles-e-richardson>
>  
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to