Most people probably don't think of Labor Day as a holiday commemorating 
struggle and death. But that's what it used to be. 

The period between the Civil War and the Great Depression was a time of 
massive upheaval: The industrial revolution swept in, and millions of 
Americans were forced to leave their farms and move to cities in search of 
work in the newly-formed rail, steel, textile, and shipping industries.

Economic policymaking was still ad hoc and primitive. Massive recessions 
<http://theweek.com/articles/588491/myths-gold-standard> regularly created 
mass poverty and threw enormous numbers of people out of work. The rules, 
both legal and social, were still being formed for how employers could 
treat employees, and how the wealth they all collectively produced would be 
distributed. Inequality soared 
<http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/pikettys-inequality-story-in-six-charts>
 
to enormous heights by the end of the period. The minimum wage, the 40-hour 
work week, laws against child labor, and more were only instituted after 
pitched political combat. Unions were growing as the one avenue by which 
workers could fight for their interests, and the economy saw waves of 
regular strikes and work stoppages that would be unheard of 
<http://theweek.com/articles/606915/economy-peaceful-today-thats-bad-news> 
today.

Sometimes, the battles were literal: Employers and politicians were not shy 
about busting unions with police forces and hired enforcers. Riots, deaths, 
and bombings were not uncommon.

The first inklings 
<http://www.perryvillenews.com/news/article_d10b9272-6fa8-11e6-8394-f75517217bb4.html>
 
of America's Labor Day took shape in 1882, when the Central Labor Union 
(CLU) met in September in New York City for a labor festival. It's disputed 
<http://www.history.com/topics/holidays/labor-day> who first proposed the 
idea. It might have been Peter McGuire, a co-founder of the American 
Federation of Labor (AFL), who was inspired by a parade in Toronto in 1872 
in support of a strike against 58-hour work weeks. Other research points to 
Matthew Maguire, a machinist and member of the Knights of Labor 
<https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/knights-of-labor-jim-crow-labor-populism-reconstruction/>.
 
But somehow or another, the idea for a parade and yearly holiday to honor 
American workers was hatched.

The first parade of the new project was held in Manhattan on Sept. 5, 1882. 
It started out small, but then 
<https://www.dol.gov/general/laborday/history-elevator> a band showed up, 
and workers' groups from various industries began to flow in. Eventually 
the parade swelled to 10,000. After that initial success, various state and 
municipal governments began naming an official day 
<https://www.dol.gov/general/laborday/history> to commemorate labor.

Then a massive recession hit 
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/01/labor-day-2014_n_5738262.html> in 
1893.

The job losses were devastating — and the frustration crystallized in a 
nationwide strike against the Pullman Company, a railroad car manufacturer 
and founder of one of the most infamous company towns in America.

Railroad baron George Pullman created his eponymous town 
<http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/business-july-dec01-labor_day_9-2/> in 
1880 just outside Chicago. It was a model of capitalist feudalism, with 
workers offered housing in line with their position in the company. 
Residents worked for Pullman's company and their rent was automatically 
docked from their paychecks. They even banked at Pullman's bank. But 
Pullman's business plummeted when the recession hit. Hundreds were laid off 
and wages were deeply cut — yet rents in the town did not decline.

In response, 4,000 of Pullman's workers went on strike 
<http://www.history.com/topics/holidays/labor-day> on May 11, 1894.

On June 26, the American Railroad Union — led by Eugene V. Debs — called 
for a supporting boycott. One hundred and fifty thousand railway workers in 
27 states joined the strike, refusing 
<https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/09/labor-day-may-first-american-labor-movement-haymarket/>
 
to operate Pullman rail cars. The massive halt to the rail industry and the 
interruption of U.S. mail cars set off a national crisis. Congress and 
President Grover Cleveland, looking to save face, rushed through a bill 
declaring Labor Day a national holiday. Cleveland signed it on June 28, 
1894. He was backed by the AFL — the more conservative portion of the labor 
movement — which threw the first official Labor Day parade that year.

But it was a brutally ironic gesture.

Six days later, under pressure from the furious leaders of the rail 
industry, and facing the virtual shutdown of U.S. mail trains, Cleveland 
invoked the Sherman Antitrust Act to declare the stoppage a federal crime. 
He sent in 12,000 federal troops to break the strike. Days of fighting and 
riots ensued, as strikers overturned and burned railcars, and the troops 
responded with violent crackdowns. Anywhere from a dozen to over 30 workers 
were killed before the strikers were dispersed and the trains restarted.

Debs was sent to prison, where he read Marx for the first time, setting him 
on the path to becoming arguably America's most famous socialist.

Cleveland and others picked the September date for Labor Day as a kind of 
alternative to May Day 
<http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5369420>, which had 
by then arisen as the principal day 
<http://time.com/3222093/labor-day-school-white-history-monday-september/> 
of celebration for workers' movements around the world. On May 1, 1886, 
over 250,000 workers struck in Chicago, shutting down 13,000 businesses to 
demand a shorter work week for equal pay. After several days of peaceful 
protest, an unknown assailant threw a bomb at police in Haymarket Square on 
May 4. The police responded by firing into the crowd, killing scores of 
people.

So it's understandable that many on the left view 
<https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/09/labor-day-may-first-american-labor-movement-haymarket/>
 
Labor Day as a cynical ploy — a lazy apolitical three-day weekend, which 
distracts from the remembrance of when workers fought and died for the 
basic humane decency of a shorter work week.

But you could also look at Labor Day as a remembrance of a time when the 
labor movement was a force to be reckoned with. Since the heyday of the New 
Deal, American membership in labor unions has collapsed 
<http://theweek.com/articles/536845/why-conservatives-should-embrace-labor-unions>.
 
Millions of workers in modern service industries face capricious 
<http://theweek.com/articles/540222/walmarts-schedule-change-could-give-american-families-much-needed-break>
 
employment, low pay, and dismal conditions 
<http://theweek.com/articles/547348/beyond-inequality-how-american-employers-brazenly-mistreat-workers>.
 
Inequality has returned 
<http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/pikettys-inequality-story-in-six-charts>
 
to its pre-Great-Depression levels, and the shared prosperity of the era 
immediately after the New Deal is a distant memory. Even the 40-hour work 
week is falling 
<http://theweek.com/articles/629256/how-insane-work-hours-became-mark-american-privilege>
 
by the wayside.

All of which makes Labor Day ripe for reclaiming, in the name of some 
long-unfinished business.

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to