there was no cover-up....There was no deceit.....Much ado, about nothing.
---
opinion noted.

The *Iran–Contra affair* (Persian 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_language>: ماجراي ایران-کنترا‎‎, 
Spanish <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_language>: *caso Irán-Contra*), 
also referred to as *Irangate*,[1] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-1> 
*Contragate*[2] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-2> or 
the *Iran–Contra scandal*, was a political scandal 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_scandal> in the United States 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States> that occurred during the 
second term of the Reagan Administration 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_Administration>. Senior 
administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran>, which was the subject of an arms 
embargo <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_embargo>.[3] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-3> They 
hoped thereby to secure the release of several U.S. hostages 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanon_hostage_crisis> and to fund the 
Contras <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contras> in Nicaragua 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicaragua>. Under the Boland Amendment 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boland_Amendment>, further funding of the 
Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.

While President Ronald Reagan <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan> 
was a supporter of the Contra cause 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#The_Contras>
,[6] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-6> 
the evidence is disputed as to whether he authorized the diversion of the 
money raised by the Iranian arms sales to the Contras.[4] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-tce-4>
[5] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-reagan_no-bbc-5>
[7] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-report_sum-7>
 
Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caspar_Weinberger> on December 7, 1985, 
indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as 
well as the sale of Hawk <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIM-23_Hawk> and TOW 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGM-71_TOW> missiles to "moderate elements" 
within that country.[8] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-gwu.edu-8> 
Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality 
but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed 
up a chance to free the hostages'".[8] 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair#cite_note-gwu.edu-8> 
After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on 
national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed 
occurred.

On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 12:32:17 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> ​I believe verbatim what the President said, and clearly the evidence 
> produced, (e.g.; the depositions and testimony from petty much everyone) 
>  demonstrated that there was no cover-up....There was no deceit.....Much 
> ado, about nothing.
>
> Thanks for sharing this Plain Ol'!  I hope you took the time to read 
> President Reagan's testimony!
>
> Here's a portion of the actual testimony, which I've watched recently in 
> it's entirety:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4_jTDUhT0A
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbV2p95f8YA
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZsLWP9mRdQ
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1990-02-23/news/9001160085_1_john-poindexter-recall-reagan-testimony
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:35:12 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/2016/09/brain-freeze.html
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to