*'investigators told the 911 Commission that the reason why they attacked is because of America's support of Israel"*
*===========* Among a myriad of other reasons that were identified by the Investigators of the Islamic Terrorists. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:30 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > The 9/11 Commission the only independent investigation into the greatest > terror attack in US history began with a particularly benign mandate. The > Preface to the report asserted: “Our aim has not been to assign > <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/911Report.pdf>individual > <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/911Report.pdf>blame > <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/911Report.pdf>,” but “to identify > lessons learned.” > --- > investigators told the 911 Commission that the reason why they attacked is > because of America's support of israel. > > On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 9:06:00 AM UTC-5, MJ wrote: >> >> >> SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 >> >> *9/11’S KNOWN KNOWNS *JEFF CLYBURN >> >> Years of willful deception, the sands of time, and simple neglect all >> tend to cloud our perception of the reality of history. This is especially >> true for politically radioactive topics like 9/11. >> >> With the debate over 9/11 heating up as the 15th anniversary of that >> fateful day draws near, it’s a good time to get back up to speed. >> *WhoWhatWhy* believes there are essential pillars of the 9/11 debate >> that must be acknowledged by all parties before any healthy discussion of >> that paradigm-changing topic can take place. >> >> What follows is a refresher list of “known knowns” select, broad >> aspects of 9/11 that are at present beyond reasonable doubt: >> >> *• *The money trail was never followed to its logical conclusion. The >> 9/11 Commission concluded the question of who funded the attacks “was of >> little practical significance >> <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/911Report.pdf>.” >> >> *• *The Bush White House pushed back against >> <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bush-opposes-9-11-query-panel/> any >> independent investigation into 9/11. >> >> *• *Once the White House agreed to an independent investigation, it >> provided a budget >> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/03/29/911-panel-to-receive-more-money/81b568a9-610a-4901-9d0d-8012abcadaea/> >> of >> $3 million >> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/03/29/911-panel-to-receive-more-money/81b568a9-610a-4901-9d0d-8012abcadaea/>, >> or 27% of the amount requested by 9/11 Commission co-chairs, Thomas Keane >> and Lee Hamilton. >> >> *• *The Bush White House’s first choice to lead the 9/11 Commission was >> the highly controversial Henry Kissinger. Under intense pressure due to >> conflicts of interest, he resig >> <http://edition.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/kissinger.resigns/> ned >> <http://edition.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/kissinger.resigns/> a >> month later. >> >> *• *The 9/11 Commission was compromised >> <http://www.newsweek.com/untold-story-911-probe-93453> by having White >> House policy advisor Philip Zelikow as its executive director. He was >> alleged to have been in close contact with controversial >> <http://www.rense.com/general31/EXPs.htm>White House Chief of Staff Karl >> Rove throughout the investigation. >> >> *• *The 9/11 Commission the only independent investigation into the >> greatest terror attack in US history began with a particularly benign >> mandate. The Preface to the report asserted: “Our aim has not been to >> assign <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/911Report.pdf>individual >> <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/911Report.pdf>blame >> <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/911Report.pdf>,” but “to identify >> lessons learned.” >> >> *• *Saudi agents some with ties to the White House sent financial >> and logistical support >> <http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us-covered-up-saudi-role-in-911/> to >> men who then provided that support to the hijackers. That’s according to >> the Congressional 2002 Joint Inquiry report, multiple media accounts and at >> least one FBI agent who worked on 9/11 cases. >> >> *• *Efforts to further investigate Saudi nationals were resisted >> <http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us-covered-up-saudi-role-in-911/> by >> the White House >> <http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us-covered-up-saudi-role-in-911/>and >> CIA over and over again. >> >> *• *Indian intelligence, corroborated by the FBI, showed a wire >> transfer of $100,000 from the phone of Pakistan’s Inter-Services >> Intelligence (ISI) chief Mahmud Ahmad to 9/11 lead hijacker Mohammed Atta >> in 2000. Ahmad (also reported as Ahmed) was in >> <http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?the_isi:_a_more_detailed_look=mahmoodAhmed&timeline=complete_911_timeline> >> Washington >> D.C. >> <http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?the_isi:_a_more_detailed_look=mahmoodAhmed&timeline=complete_911_timeline> >> on the morning of the attacks, meeting with US lawmakers. >> >> *• *The $100,000 transaction was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission >> report and Ahmad was never detained for questioning. >> >> *• *The “28 pages” from a redacted chapter of the 2002 Joint Inquiry >> report into the attacks, we were told, had “ nothing to do with national >> security <http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/twenty-eight-pages>.” >> But national security was the very reason given for withholding them for 14 >> years by both the George W. Bush and Barack Obama White Houses. >> >> *• *Those 28 pages were partially released in July >> <https://28pagesdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/declasspart4.pdf> of >> 2016, but were still heavily redacted at crucial passages. >> >> *• *Multiple, overlapping war game drills >> <http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2006/08/norad200608> created some level >> of confusion at the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and >> the Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) on the morning of the attacks. >> >> *• *Around noon on 9/11, air traffic controllers who handled some of >> the hijacked flights made a recording recalling their experiences of the >> events from a few hours earlier. The tape was later destroyed >> <http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/06/national/faa-official-scrapped-tape-of-911-controllers-statements.html?_r=0> >> by an unidentified FAA supervisor without any transcripts taken. >> >> *• *In the days before 9/11, highly abnormal levels of put options >> <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/profiting-from-disaster/> bets that a >> stock price will fall were in place on major US stock markets for not >> only the airlines involved, but also for multiple financial giants that >> suffered significant losses in the attacks. >> >> *• *The SEC’s investigation into those irregularities gave little >> details for their benign conclusion that all trades were legitimate and >> curiously destroyed all their records >> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/unusual-trading-in-stock-options-prior-to-9-11-government-destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-9-11-put-options/19750> >> . >> >> *• *Blaming Iraq was the talking point advanced by the Bush >> administration within days of the attacks >> <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/plans-for-iraq-attack-began-on-9-11/>. >> Later, multiple reports surfaced >> <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bush-sought-way-to-invade-iraq/> alleging >> that the neoconservatives who made up the hawkish Project for a New >> American Century think tank and the Bush Administration had been planning >> for (and discussing the need to publicly justify) an invasion of Iraq ( >> and Afghanistan >> <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/mar/24/september11.usa2>) long >> before 9/11 >> <http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB326/IraqWarPart1-Timeline.pdf>. >> >> *• *Iraq had absolutely nothing to do >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_A77N5WKWM> with 9/11. >> >> *• *Opium production (used to make heroin) in Afghanistan plummeted >> under Taliban rule in 2001, but then ballooned again when US forces >> retook control >> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-spoils-of-war-afghanistan-s-multibillion-dollar-heroin-trade/91> >> of the region. >> >> *• *In the late 90s, the US supported the Taliban and its agenda for a >> unified Afghanistan. Three years before 9/11, US oil giant Unocal pulled >> out of a long-negotiated deal >> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/9-11-possible-motives-of-the-bush-administration/1391> >> to build natural gas and oil pipelines through the region, from the >> resource-rich Caspian basin south to the Indian Ocean. Skeptics insist the >> US government and Unocal suddenly saw the Taliban, which provided a base of >> operations for Al-Qaeda, as an obstacle to those pipeline plans. >> >> This is by no means a full list of inadequately-investigated facts >> surrounding 9/11. >> >> People loyal to the official narrative at first denied the veracity of >> many of these facts. Later, when the corroborations and confirmations >> became overwhelming, they shifted gears, insisting these “knowns” didn’t >> matter. >> >> We invite you to add your own bullet points in the Comments section >> below, though we encourage you to focus on what has been well-documented, >> i.e., what is available for all to verify on the public record. >> >> http://whowhatwhy.org/2016/09/08/911s-known-knowns/ >> > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
