*Obama’s tragic admission: He’s learned nothing as president
<http://nypost.com/2016/10/04/obamas-tragic-admission-hes-learned-nothing-as-president/>*

By Michael Goodwin <http://nypost.com/author/michael-goodwin/>

October 4, 2016 | 11:42pm

[image: obama-1]

News flash: President Obama didn’t learn anything in eight years in the
White House. And he’s proud of it.

As Obama admitted in an interview with New York magazine
<http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/10/barack-obama-on-5-days-that-shaped-his-presidency.html>:
“If you go back and you read speeches I made when I was running for the US
Senate in 2003, or if you go back further and you look at statements I made
when I was on the Harvard Law Review, my worldview is pretty consistent.”

The comment was a point of pride, which makes it doubly tragic. Once the
smartest man in the room, always the smartest man in the room.

Never mind that the world is on fire, that America is polarized, angry and
scared. Or that ObamaCare is a sick patient, that the economy is growing at
a snail’s pace and that many cities are racial war zones.

It’s not Obama’s fault. None of it. He would do it all again.

With voters fixated on his successor, Obama is fixated on his legacy. A
large part of his effort on the way out the door is explaining what he did,
and insisting that what he did was right. Always.

There’s no news there, but there is some valuable insight from the ways he
defends the indefensible. Let it be a warning to Donald Trump and Hillary
Clinton about the pitfalls of the power they are seeking.

If nothing else, the winner should take the oath of office next January
armed with the knowledge that hubris is the common thread in Obama’s many
failures.

For example, the president says his secret sauce was that he “trusted my
judgment” but didn’t “trust the noise out there,” meaning Republicans, talk
radio, cable TV and pretty much everybody else who didn’t agree with him.

At some point, he said, he concluded his critics were “not even trying to
be fair-minded in their assessments or recommendations,” and he found that
liberating because he could ignore them.

Whether it was enforcing his red line in Syria, which he didn’t, or
substituting executive orders for congressional action, he expressed no
regret. He was right and everybody else was wrong.

It’s a remarkable notion, yet plainly a trend when government is the
largest special interest, one that uses and abuses its power to look out
for itself. Especially under liberals, it only admits failure to demand
more power.

This is no small feat. Consider that way back in the reign of George W.
Bush, it was universally accepted that a president ought to be held
accountable for national problems. A war that didn’t work out as planned, a
natural disaster or an economic one all fell on the head of the occupant of
the Oval Office.

But Obama and his apologists cleverly reversed the dynamic. Now the
American public is to blame when things go wrong.

It’s because people are “deplorables” or some other ignorant form of lif
<http://nypost.com/2016/09/10/clinton-half-of-trumps-supporters-are-a-basket-of-deplorables/>e
that leads them to resist wise choices government makes for them. If only
the people were smart enough and honest enough to understand how lucky they
are, the country would be better off.

Throughout this interview and others, it is clear that Obama is leaving
office with both his worldview and his prejudices firmly intact. Recall
that during the 2008 campaign, talking to donors in San Francisco, he said
that white working-class people in Pennsylvania and places like it were
falling behind economically and “they get bitter, they cling to guns or
religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them.”

That’s the most quoted part of his remarks, but the rest of it was equally
snobbish: Those same people, he said, also cling to “anti-immigrant
sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Imagine if Obama had listened to those people, instead of shutting them out
as noise. Imagine if he seen their problems as legitimate, instead of
seeing them as backwoods bigots.

But he didn’t, and so he leaves the country more bitterly divided than when
he began. And, as I have said before, Trump’s rise through his focus on
immigration and trade are a big part of Obama’s legacy.

Obama often said he wanted to transform America. A President Trump is
certainly not the transformation he had in mind, but it may be the one he
gets.

Imagine that inauguration.

*Handouts = progress in BlasWorld*

In a normal city under a normal mayor, a rise in the number of people who
need free food would be seen as a failure.

But in Bill de Blasio’s progressive New York, growing government dependency
is cause for celebration.

Stranger still, City Hall hopes that more people will sign up for free food
in coming months. Yippeee!

The increase in food-stamp recipients is only 2 percent for the year. But
the uptick ends three years of decreases that saw declines of 12
percent, according
to Politico.
<http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/story/2016/10/food-stamp-recipients-increasing-in-new-york-city-after-long-decrease-106039>

Worse yet, the increase is part of a trend where the poor are getting
poorer, or there are more of them. Homelessness is set to reach an all-time
high of 60,000 people and welfare cash grants are up under de Blasio by 7
percent.

Shame is no longer a culture barrier to taking free stuff, and the city is
removing legal barriers. ­De Blasio dropped most hurdles to entering the
shelter system, which is growing faster than overwhelmed bureaucrats can
move people into housing.

Similarly, the number of welfare recipients, who live on cash grants, is
growing because it is easier to enroll. That number now stands at 370,574.

The food-stamp program helps feed more than 1.7 million people, or about 20
percent of Gotham’s population. It means too many people, most of them
working, need handouts to make ends meet.

Yet City Hall hails the growth as a success, saying its expansion efforts
are paying off. A spokesperson even told Politico that “we expect that even
more New Yorkers in need will enroll.”

More and better jobs don’t seem to be part of the plan. Yet because de
Blasio boasts that his policies reflect “progressive values,” he must mean
that increased poverty and dependency are progressive.

*Hillary gets Bubbacrossed*

A day after he called ObamaCare “the craziest thing in the world,”
<http://nypost.com/2016/10/04/bill-clinton-slams-obamacare-as-craziest-thing-in-the-world/>
Bill Clinton went after a Bernie Sanders supporter
<http://nypost.com/2016/10/04/bill-clinton-threw-bernie-sanders-under-the-bus/>
who was heckling him in Ohio.

Two possibilities: Bubba’s legendary skills are failing him, or he secretly
doesn’t want Hillary in the White House.

Then again, it’s possible both are true.

*NJ logic taxing*

A story on the pending New Jersey budget has “experts” calling it a bad
deal because tax cuts mean the state can’t afford everything it wants to
do. That’s strange, because none of the “experts” worried whether Jersey
taxpayers could afford a near tripling of the gas tax
<http://nypost.com/2016/10/01/christie-democrats-agree-to-raise-cheap-new-jersey-gas-tax/>,
to 37.5 cents per gallon, which is also part of the budget.


------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZDVoanJiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzU2OTQzMjk->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZ21ndWZzBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3NTY5NDMzMA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to