As much as (at least most of us) respect Bob Woodward; let's make no mistake about it.....Bobby is a Secular Progressive liberal and although at least a Secular Progressive Liberal who possesses some common sense; the operative words here are, "Secular Progressive Liberal"
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, geoffrey theist <[email protected]> wrote: > Investigation is a misnomer when used in a sentence with FBI. > > On Oct 30, 2016 10:42 AM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Apparently Bob is misinformed. The Clinton Foundation IS being >> investigated for criminal activity by he FBI. >> >> On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 9:08:00 AM UTC-4, MJ wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Oct 24, 2016 7:25 AM >>> >>> *Watergate's Bob Woodward: "Clinton Foundation Is Corrupt, It's A >>> Scandal" *by Tyler Durden >>> >>> It's one thing for the right-wing press to accuse the Clinton foundation >>> of cronyism, corruption, and scandal ( especially if the facts >>> <http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-07/clinton-foundation-charity-fraud-epic-proportions-analyst-charges-stunning-takedown>, >>> and internal admissions by affiliated employees, confirm as much >>> <http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-22/meet-man-who-can-expose-real-hillary-clinton-scandal>) >>> - it tends to be generally ignored by the broader, if left-leaning, media. >>> But when the Watergate scandal's Bob Woodward, associate editor at the >>> liberal Washington Post, says very much the same, Hillary Clinton's >>> campaign has no choice but to notice. This is precisely what happened today >>> when journalist Bob Woodward told a Fox News Sunday panel >>> >>> *that the Clinton Foundation is "corrupt" and that Hillary Clinton has >>> not answered for it. *Here, courtesy of RealClearPolitics, is the >>> transcript of today's exchange: >>> >>> CHRIS WALLACE, FOX NEWS SUNDAY: Then there are the allegations about the >>> Clinton Foundation and pay to play,which I asked Secretary Clinton about in >>> the debate, and she turned into an attack on the Trump Foundation. But, >>> Bob, I want to go back to the conversation I was having with Robby Mook >>> before. When -- when you see what seems to be clear evidence that Clinton >>> Foundation donors were being treated differently than non-donors in terms >>> of access, when you see this new -- new revelations about the $12 million >>> deal between Hillary Clinton, the foundation, and the king of Morocco, are >>> voters right to be troubled by this? x BOB WOODWARD, THE WASHINGTON >>> POST: I -- yes, it's a -- it’s corrupt. It's -- it’s a scandal. And she >>> didn't answer your question at all. And she turned to embrace the good work >>> that the Clinton Foundation has done. And she has a case there. But the >>> mixing of speech fees, the Clinton Foundation, and actions by the State >>> Department, which she ran, are all intertwined and it's corrupt. You know, >>> I mean, you can't just say it's unsavory. But there's no formal >>> investigation going on now, and there are outs that they have. But >>> the election isn't going to be decided on that. I mean Karl was making the >>> point about this, I'm not going to observe the result of the election. I >>> mean that's -- that’s absurd. I mean it has no consequence. If Trump loses, >>> they're not going to let him in the White House. He’s not going to have a >>> transition team. And -- and to focus on that, I think, is wrong. I think >>> the issue is, what's going to be the aftermath of this campaign. >>> >>> So it's corrupt, it's a scandal, and... it will have no consequences at >>> all. It's time to look up the latest definition of Banana republic again. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/23/bob_woodwa >>> rd_on_clinton_foundation_it_is_corrupt_she_didnt_answer_the_ >>> question.html >>> >>> http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/watergates-bob-wood >>> ward-clinton-foundation-corrupt-its-scandal >>> >> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
