mike- Companies are tumbling and consumers cannot spend and jobs are
being slashed and the sick stock market is imploding and six figure
homes are selling for $29,000. Wake up!

On Nov 7, 6:46�am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> you mean one of the bush administration manufacturing jobs at Micky
> D's
>
> On Nov 7, 4:56�am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yep.
>
> > You thought you were losing Jobs Abroad before, wait until Obama is
> > through with you...
>
> > You will be lucky if you could get a Job at McDonald's.
>
> > On Nov 7, 1:47�am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Big Business Prepares for a Less Friendly 
> > > Washingtonhttp://www.truthout.org/110608B
> > > Washington - After years of playing offense, big business is getting
> > > ready for the less familiar role of playing defense following
> > > President-elect Barack Obama's victory and legislative gains by other
> > > Democrats.
>
> > > � � Corporate America enjoyed favorable treatment under the Bush
> > > administration for almost eight years and for most of the era of
> > > Republican control of Congress from 1995 to 2007.
>
> > > � � Now unions may gain a stronger hand, and business is bracing for
> > > greater financial regulation, worker-friendly policies and an
> > > emphasis
> > > on social spending.
>
> > > � � From a guarded view on trade to expanded collective-bargaining
> > > rights, there's a new wind blowing through the Capitol and big
> > > business groups are bracing for a storm.
>
> > > � � One reason they're sure to find a less sympathetic ear is that
> > > members of groups such as the National Association of Manufacturers
> > > and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce spent big bucks trying to defeat
> > > Democrats in congressional races.
>
> > > � � Instead, Democrats expanded their numbers in both chambers. That
> > > left these groups on Wednesday trying to put a bright face on results
> > > that gave Democrats at least five more Senate seats and 18 new
> > > members
> > > of the House of Representatives.
>
> > > � � "There are many areas of potential cooperation," John Engler, a
> > > former Republican governor of Michigan and now the president of the
> > > manufacturers' group, said in an optimistic morning-after news
> > > conference.
>
> > > � � Greg Casey, president of the Business-Industry Political Action
> > > Committee, offered: "It's an opportunity for the American people to
> > > ask for competence in government."
>
> > > � � Business lobbies can take solace in one important development:
> > > Democrats appear to have failed to win enough Senate seats to reach
> > > the 60-vote margin needed to cut off debate and force votes on
> > > controversial legislation.
>
> > > � � This numbers game is important because unions have their eye on
> > > rapid passage of the Employee Free Choice Act, which was supported by
> > > Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden. The legislation would end
> > > seven decades of secret balloting during union drives and instead
> > > allow organizers to collect signatures from a majority of workers to
> > > form a union. This process is called "card check."
>
> > > � � "We're very optimistic about an Obama presidency. The Employee
> > > Free Choice Act is our number one legislative priority for next year
> > > and we are going to be pushing very hard," said Thea Lee, the chief
> > > economist for the AFL-CIO. "It was the centerpiece of our electoral
> > > efforts . . . we are very confident that it will happen."
>
> > > � � Less than 24 hours after the election, both unions and big
> > > business were busy identifying who they'd be pressuring if the issue
> > > goes to a vote early next year. Many House members voted for it
> > > earlier this year, knowing that it wouldn't pass the Senate.
>
> > > � � Now, with a president who won't veto the pro-union legislation,
> > > more Democrats in the Senate and Republicans in disarray, it's a
> > > different ballgame.
>
> > > � � "Next time out its not going to be considered a 'free vote' by
> > > anybody, so that's a changing dynamic," said R. Bruce Josten,
> > > executive vice president of government affairs for the Chamber of
> > > Commerce. "I am still positive that we can defeat it."
>
> > > � � Manufacturers fear an early vote on the question.
>
> > > � � "This is not the time and certainly not the issue to build a
> > > relationship," Engler said, suggesting that Obama and Democrats will
> > > need big business to help turn around the economy. He identified
> > > Virginia's Democratic senator-elect, Mark Warner, a pro-business
> > > centrist, as a Democrat he'll be lobbying to block the card-check
> > > measure.
>
> > > � � While recognizing that unions will have a voice in the White
> > > House
> > > for the first time in many years, the Chamber's Josten wasn't worried
> > > that he won't be heard.
>
> > > � � "I had to fight for two years with the Republican majority in
> > > Congress on immigration (reform) . . . the majority of people we were
> > > fighting were Republicans," he said. He also recalled that the
> > > business group also fought a losing battle against complicated new
> > > accounting rules after energy giant Enron's collapse.
>
> > > � � With the jobless rate expected to rise above 7 percent before
> > > Obama takes office and the economy expected to contract sharply over
> > > the 10 weeks until inauguration, Josten thinks that reversing the
> > > economic slump will trump any activist agenda.
>
> > > � � "It's the economy, the economy and the economy," he said. "Obama
> > > is a smart guy and he knows his policies depend on the economy
> > > growing."- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to