Which proves international law is anything anyone says it is, i.e.
meaningless.



B



December 31, 2016
Divine Islamic Revelation Now International Law

By Jonathan F. Keiler
<http://www.americanthinker.com/author/jonathan_f_keiler/>

Who is the real winner in the passing of U.N. Resolution 2334 condemning
Israeli “settlements” in so-called Palestinian land? It is not the Arabs
who live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, nor the leftist BDS movement,
nor the world community which acted in usual blind lock-step in condemning
Israel, or even the Obama administration which sacrificed American stature
and credibility to express personal pique, though all appear to be
gleefully rubbing grubby hands. The real winner is radical Islam, which the
aforementioned parties claim to oppose.

For all the talk of preserving a “two-state” solution between Israel and
the Palestinian Arabs, and its attendant equivocating between Arab violence
and incitement and the peaceful building of Jewish homes, the real heart
2334 is the first paragraph
<http://www.timesofisrael.com/full-text-of-unsc-resolution-approved-dec-23-demanding-israel-stop-all-settlement-activity/>,
which
states that the Resolution

Reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the
Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no
legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law…

That “international law” is the creation of U.N. Security Council, which
invents such law with the passage of resolutions, regardless of whether
standard principles of law-making, such as precedent, judicial or statutory
authority are present. If the U.N.S.C. passed a resolution declaring Mars
and its “inhabitants” a country, that would be international law. Its
resolutions on Israel are almost pure exercises in self-referential
circular reasoning. But that does not mean that they are without legal or
practical impact, especially when endorsed by the United States, still --
if barely -- the world’s preeminent power.

With Resolution 2334 the U.N.S.C. and the United States (thanks to
President Obama) have endorsed and enshrined in international law the idea
that Jerusalem is a historically Arab city, a bit of myth-making that could
have come directly from an ISIS spokesman. For while it is a fact that
Jerusalem (East and West) is and mostly has been a Jewish city, about which
there can be no reasonable historical cavil, it has been the mission of
Islam to convince otherwise.

That Islamic mission is part and parcel of the broader Muslim conception
which sees Islam as the true and culminating expression of the god of
Abraham. By extension Jews and Christians are, at best, deluded inauthentic
monotheists, who may pay to be tolerated by Muslims, but nothing more.
Denying Jerusalem’s Jewish identity denies its Christian identity as well.
Thus, this resolution is as much an attack on Christians and Christianity
as it is on “Israeli settlement activity.”

A couple days before the passage of the Resolution 2334, historian Bat
Ye’or carefully delineated
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9613/europe-hatred-israel> the U.N.’s
continuing attack not only on Israel but on the West and Christianity in
criticizing last April’s Jerusalem Declaration of UNESCO
<http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/UNESCO-adopts-resolution-ignoring-Jewish-ties-to-Temple-Mount-451346>
which ignores historical Jewish ties to the Temple Mount and declares the
entire area Muslim.  Unlike U.N.S.C. resolutions, the decisions of UNESCO’s
executive council are not considered binding international law, but taken
in conjunction with Resolution 2334 that is now the practical effect.

This is yet another example of how Islam, including its most radical
adherents, is winning the war of ideas with the Judeo-Christian West, a war
that has been going on physically and intellectually since Mohammed’s first
“revelation” in the early 7th Century.

>From the start, Mohammed was acutely aware that to spread the new faith he
had to give it legitimacy in the eyes of pre-Islamic pagan Arabs who were
already gravitating toward monotheistic beliefs, some tribes having already
adopted Christianity or Judaism. Mohammed supplied this legitimacy in large
part by tying Allah’s revelations to existing belief systems, pagan and
monotheistic alike. Thus, the Quran famously references Abraham, Moses,
Jesus, and several other notable New and Old Testament figures. Per
Mohammed these men were all Muslim prophets whose words and deeds were
misinterpreted by the Christians and Jews who created the Old and New
Testaments.

So obviously, Christians and Jews have long presented a problem for Islam.
Mohammed believed that they would be eager converts to Islam, since they
were already monotheists and Allah’s “revelations” acknowledged those
Christian and Jewish prophets. When this did not happen, Mohammed and his
successors variously slaughtered, enforced conversions or reduced the
status of the “people of the book” and taxed them.

Jerusalem plays an important role in this process as I explained in detail
here
<http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/11/how_jerusalem_became_islams_third_holiest_city.html>.
While Jerusalem in not mentioned in the Quran, supposedly, early in
Mohammed’s time in Medina -- possibly to encourage Jewish conversion to
Islam -- Muslims prayed toward Jerusalem. Mohammed gave this up after a few
months and turned toward Mecca.

Islam’s second caliph, the very capable Umar, captured Jerusalem a few
years after Mohammed’s death. He deliberately chose the Temple Mount, where
the Jewish temple stood and where Jesus walked, as the site of Islam’s
first work of monumental architecture, the Dome of the Rock. He claimed the
space for Islam not only physically, but spiritually, asserting that the
rocky outcrop within the shrine was the very rock upon which Abraham took
Isaac to be sacrificed, and Muslim scholars began to claim that the
“furthest precinct” referenced in the Quran as part of Mohammed’s “night
journey” was Jerusalem.

Of course, this was a lot of hooey and still is. Certainly, medieval and
later Christians didn’t buy it, nor Jerusalem’s Jews then or now, but
evidently President Obama and the U.N.S.C. does. Because between the UNESCO
decision and Resolution 2334 it now appears that “international law” (with
the concurrence of the sitting U.S. Government) establishes East Jerusalem
with the Temple Mount and its ancient Jewish Quarter as historical Arab
territory, although it most assuredly is not.

Unlike the New and Old Testaments, the Quran eschews narrative. It is
neither a story nor a history. Muslims believe it is the direct revelation
of Allah given to Mohammed as Allah saw fit, which is not man’s role to
question. In failing to veto Resolution 2334 in the wake of the UNESCO
move, the United States along with the rest of the international community,
has now officially bought into the Islamic version of Jerusalem’s history,
and with that, effectively the Muslim assertion of divine revelation in
support of Islamic activity and the implementation of international law.
That is a godsend to Islamic terrorists and they will see it that way too.



http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/12/divine_islam
ic_revelation_now_international_law.html


------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYTVoNjVvBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0ODMyNTY5MjA->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlc2U2aXRlBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ4MzI1NjkyMA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to