What a great, well written well thought out column! Thanks for sharing this Bill, and I hope everyone will take the time to read it!
Another good one by Delingpole: http://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2016/12/25/delingpole-moronic-self-righteous-disgusting-losers-tried-to-turn-the-berlin-attack-on-nigel-farage/ On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Hot4azintop via PoliticalForum < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Sent: 1/2/2017 11:26:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time > Subj: Re: [PoliticalForum] Fwd: [grendelreport] Rules for Righties -- a > War-Winning... > > RIGHT ON! A great piece and thanx for the encouragement to keep at it and > we will win. > > A 40%'er from California. > > P.S. Just keep an eye on this liberal dominated state to see and > understand where these fools would take us all. For example: Two > Democrat members of our County Board of Supervisors' is proposing to take > $1,000,000 of property tax payer funds to spend on attorneys to represent > illegals in Court! We can guess those attorneys taking the million dollars > will be their Democratic lawyer friends. This at a time when we need roads > fixed, sewers cleaned out before the winter rains, bridges reinforced etc. > etc. etc. Their priorities are all screwed up!!! We must fight on..... > In a message dated 1/2/2017 5:51:18 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/01/01/2016-just-start-going-win-2017/ > DELINGPOLE: Rules for Righties — a War-Winning Manifesto for 2017 2016 > was a great year for most of us – but just because we’ve gained the > beachhead doesn’t mean we’re going to win the war. > > With Brexit and Donald Trump, we’ve done the equivalent of capturing > everywhere from Pointe Du Hoc to Pegasus Bridge. But just like with D-Day, > the worst of the fighting is yet to come. Our enemy is fanatical, > determined, well organised. Plus, they still hold most of the key > positions: the big banks, the corporations, the top law firms, the civil > service, local government, the universities, the schools, the mainstream > media, Hollywood… Give those bastards half the chance and they’ll drive us > back into the sea – which, in contemporary terms, means nixing Brexit (or > giving us “soft Brexit”, which is basically the same thing) and frustrating > all the things President Trump will try to do to Make America Great Again. > > I use the war analogy first because World War II analogies never fail, but > second because this really is a war that we’re fighting. The bad news is > that wars are hard, costly and ugly. The good news is that we’re on the > right side and we’re going to win. Here’s how: > > *We will never underestimate the wickedness of the enemy* > > The liberal-left loves to portray us as the bad guys. But that’s > just projection. From Mao’s China to Stalin’s Soviet Union, from Cuba to > North Korea, history is littered with the wreckage of failed left wing > schemes to make the world a better, fairer place. > > As the great, now sadly-retired Thomas Sowell > <http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2016/12/27/12-fantastic-thomas-sowell-quotes-in-honor-of-his-retirement-n2263995> > says, “Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an > intellectual could ignore or evade it.” Its malign influence is still with > us today. Innocent boys being accused of rape on college campuses; genuine > rapes committed by gangs of Muslim taxi drivers in northern England and by > gangs of Muslim immigrants in German cities like Cologne; hundreds of > thousands driven into fuel poverty, landscapes ravaged, avian fauna sliced > and diced as a result of crazy renewable energy policies; a > Nobel-prize-winning scientist driven out of his job because a feminist > loser misreported something he said about women at a conference; > generations of kids denied a rigorous, disciplined, useful education; the > needless violence and tension engendered by #blacklivesmatter: we should > never concede the moral high ground to the kind of people who make all this > sort of stuff possible, no matter how many times they tell us how evil and > selfish and uncaring we are. > > *We will always remember that we are better than them* > > I’ll give you an example: the dumbass lecturer at Drexel who tweeted that > what he wanted for Christmas was “white genocide” > <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/26/the-far-left-ideas-that-motivate-white-genocide-professor/>. > Should we be demanding that the university authorities sack him at once? Of > course we shouldn’t. > > The man has performed an invaluable public service: he has provided the > perfect example of how ingrained the values of the left are in academe; he > has shown prospective applicants to the Politics and Global Studies course > at Drexel University in Philadelphia that unless they want to be > indoctrinated with hard-left lunacy they might want to reconsider; he has > further shown alumni of Drexel University who believe in old fashioned > stuff like free markets that maybe they shouldn’t include their alma mater > in their million dollar bequests, after all. > > Sure, we should jeer and crow when we catch idiots like this man > expressing reprehensible opinions. But the idea that someone should > actually lose their job for something they said on Twitter ought to be > anathema to those of us on the right side of the argument. One of the most > thoroughly hateful things about the left is the way it tries to constrain > free expression. If we play the same game, we are no better than they are. > And face it: we just are. > > *We will take the fight to the enemy, not cower in No Man’s Land* > > One of the best things about 2016 for me was the way it gave the lie to > the weaselish and wet aphorism – so often repeated by so many of our > impeccably reasonable, sensible and balanced TV and newspaper pundits – > that elections are “won in the centre ground.” > > This was the Belial philosophy that gave us, in the U.S., that hideous > continuum from the Bushes and the Clintons to Obama; and in Britain, the > grotesque and malign Third Way squishery that took us from Tony Blair > through to his (self-admitted heir) David Cameron and beyond. (It’s also > the mindset which invented the disgraceful, sell-out concept of “soft > Brexit”.) > > No wonder so many of us had become so fed up with politics: no matter > which party you voted for, whether the notionally left-wing one or the > notionally right-wing one you still seemed to end up up with the same old > vested interests, the same old liberal Establishment elite. > > Of course we should always despise the liberal-left because their > philosophy is morally bankrupt, dangerous and wrong. But I sometimes think > that the people we should despise most of all are the squishes who pretend > to be on our side of the argument but forever betray our cause. Sometimes > they do this by throwing the more outspoken among us to the wolves in order > to signal how tolerant and virtuous they are > <https://twitter.com/JamesDelingpole/status/811282023075708928>; > sometimes they do this by endorsing some fatuous liberal position in order > to show their willingness to compromise. > > I call the latter approach the “dogshit yogurt fallacy.” > > If conservatives like fruit or honey in their yogurt and liberals prefer > to eat it with dogshit, it is NOT a sensible accommodation – much as our > centrist conservative columnists might wish it so – to say: “All right. How > about we eat our yogurt with a little bit of both?” We need to understand, > very clearly, that there *are* such things as right and wrong; and that, > furthermore, it is *always* worth fighting to the bitter end for the > right thing rather than accepting second best because a bunch of lawyers > and politicians and hairdressers from Brazil and squishy newspaper > columnists and other members of the liberal elite have told us that second > best is the best we can hope for. > > On Brexit, for example, I’m with Her Majesty the Queen > <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4069540/Well-said-Ma-BBC-s-Political-Editor-reveals-Queen-supports-Brexit-QUENTIN-LETTS-says-course-does-understands-people-far-better-politician.html>: > “‘I don’t see why we can’t just get out? What’s the problem?’ > > *We will never apologise, never explain, **never** surrender* > > See those scalped corpses, littering the plains? These are the guys – and > it is, invariably, men – who thought that if only they showed contrition > for their confected crimes the enemy would leave them alone. Sir Tim Hunt > <http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/18/sir-tim-hunt-to-leave-britain-how-feminists-chased-away-one-of-britains-geniuses/> > apologised, the guy from Saatchi > <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3718986/Woman-high-flier-hits-Saatchi-boss-sexism-row-Company-s-chief-creative-officer-says-comments-upset-huge-employees.html>apologised, > the guy on the Rosetta space programme who wore the “sexist” shirt > <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/11/15/brilliant-anti-feminist-spoof-claims-space-scientist-s-shirt-is-sexist/> > apologised. A fat lot of good it did them. The vengeful liberal-left > doesn’t just want humiliation – it wants total annihilation. > > Giving even an inch of ground to an enemy so implacable and vile is not > only futile – but it also badly lets the side down by granting them a power > that they do not deserve. The most recent sorry example of this was Steve > Martin who actually deleted a tweet praising his late friend Carrie > Fisher > <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/28/steve-martin-deletes-tweet-calling-carrie-fisher-b/>as > a “beautiful creature” because a bunch of feminazis on Twitter complained > that this was sexist objectification. > > Look, I know it’s a scary thing when the SJW witch-hunt mob turns on you. > But read Vox Day’s SJW Attack Survival Guide > <http://www.voxday.net/mart/SJW_Attack_Survival_Guide.pdf>, follow the > example of Nigel Farage and fight these people to the very last bullet > (keeping the final round for yourself). Do not surrender! (And if you need > reminding why not, read this piece I wrote the other day, of which I am > very proud > <http://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2016/12/25/delingpole-moronic-self-righteous-disgusting-losers-tried-to-turn-the-berlin-attack-on-nigel-farage/> > ) > > *We will laugh in the face of death* > > Something I’ve noticed about the liberal-left: they don’t have a sense of > humour. > > This is odd, given that 99.99 per cent of professional comedians are > liberals. But it’s also unfailingly true. Go on social media and see for > yourself: all the wittiest banter, all the funniest memes, all the > snarkiest jibes – they all come from the right side of the argument, not > the left. And this is as it should be for not only is humour a sign of > intellectual superiority but it’s also entirely the right attitude for a > team that wants to win. > > Humour requires a degree of self-knowledge; an ability to recognise your > own weaknesses (vital if you are to triumph over them) and not to take > yourself too seriously. Also, it’s a sign that you are a happy warrior – in > the manner of heroes like Andrew Breitbart. > > I always try to keep this in mind when I’m engaged in a vicious tussle > with the liberal-left: that witty barbs hurt them much more than > anger. When your enemy takes himself so seriously, no weapon is more > effective than a cutting quip. Sometimes it’s hard not be to angry because > the left has given us so much to be angry about. But we must resist the > temptation if we can because it just plays into the left’s caricature of us > as angry, blustering conservatives. We should remember at all times that in > the culture wars, we are the Greek city states and the enemy are the > Persians. If you want to know the significance of this, I recommend you > read Victor Davis Hanson’s *Carnage and Culture. *Basically, free men > will always fight better than serfs because they have more to lose… > > *We will mercilessly expose their weaknesses* > > People on the liberal-left are just like us, really, only slightly less > evolved. Their brains are stuck in that stage of evolution just before ours > – the hunter-gatherer stage when we were all roaming the plains and were > programmed to respond in the most basic way to our most primal instincts. > > This is why so much of the left-liberal ‘argument’ has to do with raw > emotion rather than logic; it’s why they’ll almost never engage with us on > detail, preferring simply to use what Vox Day calls “point and shriek” > tactics, or to try to belittle and demean us with emotive (but meaningless) > pejoratives like “racist”, “homophobe”, “misogynist”, “Islamophobe”, > “climate change denier.” > > They have been using these techniques very successfully for years and in > my experience there is only one effective way of dealing with this: you > have to *show their workings. *You have to notice what they are doing and > then you have to explain to other people what they are doing. > > This is hard: it requires patience, courage and persistence – the > equivalent of maintaining discipline under fire. Again, I refer you to this > piece > <http://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2016/12/25/delingpole-moronic-self-righteous-disgusting-losers-tried-to-turn-the-berlin-attack-on-nigel-farage/>I > wrote recently because it embodies the kind of attitude and techniques > required. Essentially it was a response to a mass assault by SJWs using > Twitter to brand those of us on the right as heartless, uncaring, ruthless, > evil people who would use a man’s recently widowed status against him. The > attacks came in 140 character bursts. The response took almost 3000 words. > But that’s the way it is: logic and rational argument take much longer to > develop than emotive cheap shots. If we don’t use logic and rational > argument though, we concede the field to the pointers and shriekers. > > *Leave no man behind* > > Diversity is our strength. This is the kind shit leftists, say, I know, > but hear me out. At a conservative political meeting I attended in DC, > recently, a woman stood up to address the assembled members of the Vast > Right Wing conspiracy. Black and dressed a bit like the lovable, wise > sassy, prostitute character from a 1970s Blaxploitation movie, she did not > look obviously like a card-carrying Republican. But she was and she had > come from California with a message: “Don’t abandon us! > > We know everyone in the conservative movement thinks that California is a > joke. But 40 per cent of us voted for Donald Trump and we need your help!” > She’s right. Unlike the left – which sees ethnic, sexual and religious > minorities mainly as client victim groups to patronise and exploit for > identity politics purposes – we on the right “celebrate diversity” by not > giving a damn about diversity. > > The reason Sowell’s great and Milo’s great and Krauthammer’s great is not > because they’re black and gay and disabled and therefore “helpful” to our > cause, but simply because they think clearly and sensibly and have come to > the right conclusions about the world. We support our own through thick and > thin. We are all equal and we all have equal rights, just like the 14th > amendment says. (Which means, by the way, that we don’t believe in positive > discrimination – which is just another form of discrimination, as practised > by the disgusting left not the sensible and just right). > > *Always attack* > > This, pretty much, was the tactic of the Royal Navy throughout the > Napoleonic Wars – even when outnumbered and outgunned by the French and the > Spanish. > > Today we are similarly outgunned and outnumbered by the loathsome edifice > of the liberal establishment – and if we are going to reduce it to rubble, > as of course we must, then we shall have to fight as aggressively as Nelson > and Cochrane did. > > For far, far too long, conservatives have been fighting a defensive war – > spending more time apologising for being conservatives than actually taking > on the enemy. But at last, in the U.S. at least, we have a leader who is > not afraid of a fight. What does “always attack” mean in practice, though? > Well here’s a perfect example: a recent *New York Times* story headed > “Wielding > Claims of ‘Fake News’ Conservatives take aim at mainstream media > <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/25/us/politics/fake-news-claims-conservatives-mainstream-media-.html?_r=0> > “. > > The author of the story appears slightly taken back that conservatives are > behaving in this way. Surely we should be feeling guilty for all those fake > news stories spread by evil right-wing people on the internet in order to > deceive the weak-minded by acting against their interests by voting for > Brexit and Donald Trump? But no, far from apologising it seems that we on > the right have been on the attack. If anyone is responsible for pumping out > fake news these last few decades its the liberal elite and their > mouthpieces in the MSM, not us. > > OK. We’re done. Unleash hell. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > [image: https://www.avast.com/antivirus] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZ20ycjNyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0ODMzNTY0ODQ-> > > > [image: > https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYjljYTU2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ4MzM1NjQ4NA--] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYjljYTU2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ4MzM1NjQ4NA--> > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe > <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms > of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
