http://fredoneverything.org/trump-to-build-death-camps-for-t
rans-gendered-people-of-color-will-deport-all-woman/



*Trump to Build Death Camps for Trans-gendered People of Color: Will Deport
All Women*

Posted on January 5, 2017
<http://fredoneverything.org/trump-to-build-death-camps-for-trans-gendered-people-of-color-will-deport-all-woman/>
by Fred Reed <http://fredoneverything.org/author/fredreed/>

I love it. Of all the things about Trump that our silly-ass Aunt Polly
media might have considered–policy toward China, relations with Iran,
reform of taxes–they seemed most agitated about…his *sex life. *Yes. Sure,
he is  a misogynist, homophobe, Islamophobe, fascist, Nazi, anti-Semite,
and probably kicks his dog. Maybe a cannibal. But the truly horrid
discovery was…that he thinks dirty thoughts about girls (as we all
do–unless we are girls, and think dirty thoughts about boys) Shocking.
*Shocking.
*Clearly he hates women.

The famous dirty-talk tape is my favorite example of high-school outrage
coupled with horrified old-maid moralism. It reveals what any sensible
person would have assumed– egotism (a rare thing among the rich and
famous), and a sexual interest in women.  How is this misogyny? If there is
one thing normal women don’t like, it is men without sexual interest in
themselves. And who can blame  them? Who wants an asexual boyfriend?

What seems most to have set people off is the “grab em by the pussy”
remark. Crude language, of the sort normally used by men and women among
themselves, where it is appropriate. It is where Trump used it. For the
record, the idea that women are not human, don’t talk dirty, do not have
rude sexual thoughts like everybody else, do not  have the same kinky
fantasies that men  have, is twaddle. We are a sexual species. We think
about those things. Deal with it.

Actually, most women seem to have dealt with it quite well. Some
fifty-three percent of white women and forty-three percent of black women
voted for him. Apparently they did not react with the required prissy
horror.

Trump said something like, “When you are a star, you can do anything with
women.” A statement of fact. Men are drawn to youth and beauty, women to
money and power. A masculine man, which Trump is, known to be a billionaire
and interested in sex, will attract many women in favor of providing it.
For that matter, a gorgeous young honey might say, “When you are a gorgeous
young honey, you can do anything with men.” That too might, or might not,
be arrogant. It would certainly be a statement of fact.

One thing that infuriates older women is that men prefer younger ones.
Sorry. I can’t fix that.

In the music business the attracted honeys are called “groupies.” How many
young women, of their own volition, would have tumbled instantly into the
rack with Ringo Starr? Are such groupies not “objectifying” their targeted
rock star–that is, regarding him as *(Eeeeeeeeeeek!) *a “sex object”?  You
bet. Or are we to think that groupies took a virginal interest in sounding
the depths of Ringo’s soul in search of a lasting meaningful relationship?
Do you suppose that Ringo objected to objectification?

Why might this make culpable either the groupies or Ringo? Or Trump? Why is
it anybody else’s business?

Feminists complain–I could stop the sentence there- that men regard women
as sex objects. I see. And what, prithee, are we supposed to regard as sex
objects? Doorknobs? Porpoises? Doughnuts? Vacuum cleaner attachments? We
are men, for God’s sake. Cocker spaniels just don’t do it for us.

The truth is that women *want* to be regarded as sex objects. Not *only* as
sex objects usually, but certainly as sex objects. Maybe some man,
somewhere, lost a girlfriend by regarding her as a sex object. A far surer
way to lose her is not to so regard her. Why do you think women buy push-up
bras, boob jobs, makeup, slinky dresses? Why do grocery-rack tabloids
always carry three miracle diets guaranteed to have the guys drooling?

Perhaps it is to repel men, and women just haven’t figured things out yet.

Why do men go to gyms, and sweat and grunt and smell bad? Is it only to
piss off feminists by being macho–that is, masculine? This would be
sufficient justification, but in fact they want to look good for women.
Have you seen those nature shows on TV with male swamp birds puffing up
their feathers, flapping their wings, and jerking their heads wildly about
while making horrible noises? It’s so the girl swamp birds will love them.
Thank God that girl swamp birds, and women, don’t have the sense God gave a
crab apple, or men would have to date possums.

Gold’s Gym is just a charm school for male swamp birds. Any fool knows that.

The Trumpian question becomes, how many of the women grabbed by Trump, if
in fact any were, objected to it? If the grabbed women were raising hell,
which apparently they are not, things would be different. Grabbing the
unwilling is major social faux pas. If women were appearing who were
forcibly raped by Trump, as so many women were by Clinton and Cosby, it
would be a very different thing, and Trump would belong in jail. Are such
abused women coming forth? Are Clinton and Cosby in  jail?

A little realism, please. The age-old rule is that women trade sex for
whatever they want, and men trade whatever they have for sex. It is how
things are. If a pretty young woman likes the thought of going to a
high-rollers’ night spot on the arm of a rich and famous man, and if the
man likes the idea of having her do so–so what? Is it your business? Mine?

Finally, though feminists everywhere will  hate it, there are a great many
women who actually like sexually assertive actual men, instead of the
docile manageables favored by *Salon*. The saying that “good girls like bad
boys” is not without steam. Who do you think is going to get laid
most–Marlon Brando or or some squeally darling of a gender-fluid girly-boy
who can be lead around on a leash by a disagreeable Swarthmore co-ed?

One reason why Trump is so hated–and why he is President–is that he is an
actual man–you know, like Killer Kowalski, Clint Eastwood, Marlboro Man, or
Humphrey Bogart. This simply is not done among the house-broken nominal men
of the media and the “elite,” and they don’t know how to handle it.
Presidents? There was Bush II, asexual, a man without vibes. Obama, a
pretty race hustler. Willy Bill Clinton, a slick Bubba with the
I-feel-your-pain mixture of Oprah and Karo syrup that got him a lot of
nookie–nothing wrong with that–but not masculine. All of the candidates
except Trump were poll-sniffing remotely programmed ciphers.

Except Trump. He told all the pretty boys and mannish girls of the media,
“Bite me.”  This didn’t play well with plasticized viragos like Megyn
Kelly–who, if she weren’t conventionally beautiful, would not have a job.
Ever notice how many female anchors are at least pretty, and how few male
reporters are handsome? There are plenty of first-rate female reporters,
but they don’t get in front of cameras. This is reserved for bubble-headed
babble blondes. Sex sells.

OK, OK, I’m stirring up trouble for the fun of it. I am a bad person. Thank
God.




------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdm91aDQxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0ODM2NzUxMjQ->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZ2hjcmo4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ4MzY3NTEyNA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to