Wow, CNN is even reporting this.

The Dem brand is burned.

On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 8:36:01 AM UTC-6, MJ wrote:

> January 5, 2017
>
> *DNC Refused to Give FBI Access to Its Servers … Instead Gave Access to a 
> DNC Consultant Tied to Organization Promoting Conflict with Russia *
> WashingtonsBlog
>
> CNN reports 
> <http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/>
> :
>
> The Democratic National Committee “rebuffed” a request from the FBI to 
> examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia 
> during the 2016 election, a senior law enforcement official told CNN 
> Thursday. “The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of 
> obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well 
> after the initial compromise had been mitigated,” a senior law enforcement 
> official told CNN. “This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third 
> party for information. *** The FBI instead relied on the assessment from 
> a third-party security company called CrowdStrike.
>
> As first reported 
> <http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/crowdstrikes-russian-hacking-story-fell-apart-say-hello-fancy-bear-2.html>
>  
> by George Eliason, CrowdStrike’s Chief Technology Officer and Co-Founder 
> Dimitri Alperovitch – who wrote 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitri_Alperovitch> the CrowdStrike 
> reports allegedly linking Russia to the Democratic party emails published 
> by Wikileaks – is a fellow at the Atlantic Council … an organization 
> associated with Ukraine, and whose main policy goal seems to stir up a 
> confrontation with Russia. [1].
>
> The Nation writes 
> <https://www.thenation.com/article/is-skepticism-treason/>:
>
> In late December, Crowdstrike released a largely debunked 
> <http://www.voanews.com/a/skeptics-doubt-ukraine-hack-link-to-dnc-cyberattack/3649234.html>
>  
> report claiming that the same Russian malware that was used to hack the DNC 
> has been used by Russian intelligence to target Ukrainian artillery 
> positions. Crowdstrike’s co-founder and chief technology officer, Dmitri 
> Alperovitch <https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch>, told PBS, “Ukraine’s 
> artillery men were targeted by the same hackers…that targeted DNC, but this 
> time they were targeting cellphones [belonging to the Ukrainian artillery 
> men] to try to understand their location so that the Russian artillery 
> forces can actually target them in the open battle.”
>
> Dmitri Alperovitch <https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch> is also a senior 
> fellow at the Atlantic Council. The connection between Alperovitch and 
> the Atlantic Council has gone largely unremarked upon, but it is relevant 
> given that the Atlantic Council­which is 
> <http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/support/supporters>funded in part 
> <http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/support/supporters> by the US State 
> Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian 
> World Congress, and the Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk­has been among 
> the loudest voices calling for a new Cold War with Russia. As I pointed out 
> in the pages of The Nation in November, the Atlantic Council has spent the 
> past several years producing some of the most virulent specimens of the new 
> Cold War propaganda. It would seem then that a healthy amount of 
> skepticism toward a government report that relied, in part, on the findings 
> of private-sector cyber security companies like Crowdstrike might be in 
> order.
>
> The Atlantic Council is also funded by 
> <http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/support/supporters> the U.S. military and 
> the largest defense contractors, including: 
>    
>    - United States Army 
>    - United States Navy 
>    - United States Air Force 
>    - United States Marines 
>    - Lockheed Martin 
>    - Raytheon 
>    - Northrop Grumman 
>    - Boeing 
>
>
> [1]  Here’s an example 
> <http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/publications/Arming_for_Deterrence_web_0719.pdf>
>  
> of the Atlantic Council’s bellicose rhetoric from July 2016:
>
> Poland should announce that it reserves the right to deploy offensive 
> cyber operations (and not necessarily in response just to cyber attacks).  
> The authorities could also suggest potential targets, which could include 
> the Moscow metro, the St. Petersburg power network, and Russian state-run 
> media outlets such as RT.
>
>
>
> http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/dnc-refused-give-fbi-access-servers-gave-access-dnc-consultant-tied-organization-promoting-cold-war-russia.html
>  
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to