You are correct D.B., although the Supremes ordered the Defendants to respond, (which is a major step!) the Court does not have to entertain the Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
On Nov 8, 2:11 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2:03 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...has SCOTUS demanded to see Obama's birth > > certificate or not? > > Apparently not: > > (Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 11/07/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, > the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging > Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the > United States filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme > Court on October 30, 2008, requesting review of the United States > District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s > Dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., > the DNC and the other co-Defendants. Accordingly, the U. S. Supreme > Court has set dates in which Barack Obama, the DNC and all co- > Defendants are to respond to the Writ, which is on or before December > 1, 2008. -http://www.obamacrimes.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
