A New Jersey congressman says a rarely invoked 1924 law could be used to 
examine President Donald Trump's tax returns for possible conflicts of interest 
and Constitutional violations.
Rep. Bill Pascrell, a Democrat who serves on the Ways and Means Committee, has 
asked the committee’s chairman, Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, to order the 
Treasury Department to provide tax returns to the committee. Brady's office did 
not respond to a request for comment Friday.
After privately examining returns — Pascrell is seeking 10 years' worth — the 
committee could decide to share them with the full House, which would in effect 
make them public. The 1924 law gives congressional committees that set tax 
policy the power to examine tax returns. It was used in 1974 when Congress 
looked at President Richard Nixon's returns, and in 2014 when the Ways and 
Means Committee released confidential tax information as part of its 
investigation into the Internal Revenue Service's handling of applications for 
nonprofit status.
Trump said during the campaign he would not release his returns because he was 
being audited. After the inauguration, adviser Kellyanne Conway said he would 
not release them because the public did not care.
Pascrell said what happened in the election does not matter.
“This isn’t for the Democrats or the Republicans, and it’s not to embarrass 
anybody," he said. "This is to make sure the American people know the facts, 
and if there are conflicts, they need to be resolved.”
Asked if he thought he would succeed, Pascrell said he believes many 
Republicans in the House and Senate "are absolutely intimidated by this 
president."
But on a different issue, the top Republican and Democrat on a key committee 
asked a top ethics regulator on Thursday to investigate whether Conway, a 
senior aide to Trump, violated ethics rules when she said in a television 
interview that people should buy the president's daughter's clothing line.
Pascrell said he did not believe Trump has turned over control of his companies 
to his children, and even if he did, Pascrell agreed with ethics officials who 
oversee the executive branch that that is not sufficient to avoid conflicts.
Pascrell also said he believes Trump is violating the “emoluments clause” of 
the Constitution, which bars federal officials from receiving gifts or other 
things of value from foreign governments. He raised that issue in a Feb. 1 
letter to Brady.
We know that state-owned enterprises in China and the United Arab Emirates are 
involved in his businesses, and that his business ties stretch to India, Turkey 
and the Philippines and beyond,” Pascrell wrote. “Russia, Saudi Arabia and 
Taiwan may also have ties to his businesses.”
Pascrell said foreign governments are paying rents, licensing fees, and issuing 
permits for Trump Organization projects, all of which could be used to 
influence the president.The letter asked Brady to reply by Wednesday.
“If I get a ‘no’ answer on this, I’ll be very honest with you: If these guys 
think I’m walking away from this, they’re absolutely nuts," Pascrell said. "The 
calls we’re getting, the calls other congressmen are getting, it’s 
unbelievable, we never expected this.”
Members of Congress are not required to release their tax returns, but must 
file financial disclosure forms, similar to one Trump had to file when he ran 
for president, outlining sources of income and the value of certain assets.
Pascrell, who is in his 11th term in the House, does not regularly release his 
own tax returns. In January 2012, when he was running in a competitive 
Democratic primary, he released his 2010 return after learning his opponent had 
also done so.
It showed Pascrell, now 80, had $267,518 in income in 2010, including his 
congressional salary and New Jersey pension from service as a state legislator, 
mayor and Paterson employee. He and his wife paid $57,740 in federal taxes, or 
an effective tax rate of 22 percent.

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to