This comes from powers above Obama, ones he willingly sold his soul to for their backing so to be president. I have been saying for a long time - they want war with Russia. Ukraine was their sabotage on Obama/Clinton's 'Reset' of relations. I am not sure that Obama knew the extent of their deceit, I don't think he cared. Being POTUS was worth the price of serving them and letting them do as they pleased. Always, follow the money and cui bono - who profits. In this, it is particularly the military industrial complex, the defense contractors who have massive contracts handling intelligence functions as well as others.
This is a much watch and heed his warning interview with a DEMOCRAT, one of the few decent and respectable ones out there: *Dennis Kucinich Acurately Outlines The Danger Of a Rogue Intelligence Community…* <https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/15/dennis-kucinich-acurately-outlines-the-danger-of-a-rogue-intelligence-community/> *Posted on February 15, 2017 <https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/15/dennis-kucinich-acurately-outlines-the-danger-of-a-rogue-intelligence-community/> by sundance <https://theconservativetreehouse.com/author/sundancecracker/>* *Former Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) appeared on Fox News to discuss Gen. Michael Flynn resignation and the larger more dangerous issue of a rogue intelligence community undermining the U.S. presidency and operating on behalf of a deep state construct of subversive government.* *https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=35&v=7j_ZfKmcnSk* *.* *Kucinich is not alone; multiple voices across the most broad spectrum of politics are now in agreement that what has taken place within a subversive intelligence network, is far more dangerous to our constitutional republic than any political division or disagreement.* *The domestic entities hiding within a Deep State construct are acting independently of legal and constitutional parameters in a direct act of sedition against the U.S. government.* On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 8:33:55 PM UTC-6, Perplexed wrote: > > > The abrupt resignation Monday evening of White House national security > adviser Michael Flynn is the culmination of a secret, months-long campaign > by former Obama administration confidantes to handicap President Donald > Trump's national security apparatus and preserve the nuclear deal with > Iran, according to multiple sources in and out of the White House who > described to the *Washington Free Beacon* a behind-the-scenes effort by > these officials to plant a series of damaging stories about Flynn in the > national media. > > > The effort, said to include former Obama administration adviser Ben > Rhodes—the architect of a separate White House effort to create what he > described as a pro-Iran echo chamber—included a small task force of Obama > loyalists who deluged media outlets with stories aimed at eroding Flynn's > credibility, multiple sources revealed. > > > The operation primarily focused on discrediting Flynn, an opponent of the > Iran nuclear deal, in order to handicap the Trump administration's efforts > to disclose secret details of the nuclear deal with Iran that had been long > hidden by the Obama administration. > > > Insiders familiar with the anti-Flynn campaign told the *Free Beacon* > that these Obama loyalists plotted in the months before Trump's > inauguration to establish a set of roadblocks before Trump's national > security team, which includes several prominent opponents of diplomacy with > Iran. The *Free Beacon* first reported > <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/obama-allies-working-undermine-trumps-national-security-team/> > > on this effort in January. > > > Sources who spoke to the *Free Beacon* requested anonymity in order to > speak freely about the situation and avoid interfering with the White > House's official narrative about Flynn, which centers on his failure to > adequately inform the president about a series of phone calls with Russian > officials. > > > Flynn took credit for his missteps regarding these phone calls in a brief > statement released late Monday evening. Trump administration officials > subsequently stated that Flynn's efforts to mislead the president and vice > president about his contacts with Russia could not be tolerated. > > > However, multiple sources closely involved in the situation pointed to a > larger, more secretive campaign aimed at discrediting Flynn and undermining > the Trump White House. > > > "It's undeniable that the campaign to discredit Flynn was well underway > before Inauguration Day, with a very troublesome and politicized series of > leaks designed to undermine him," said one veteran national security > adviser with close ties to the White House team. "This pattern reminds me > of the lead up to the Iran deal, and probably features the same cast of > characters." > > > The *Free Beacon* first reported in January that, until its final days in > office, the Obama administration hosted > <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/former-iranian-official-pro-tehran-lobbyist-hosted-obama-white-house-dozens-times/> > > several pro-Iran voices who were critical in helping to mislead the > American public about the terms of the nuclear agreement. This included a > former Iranian government official and the head of the National Iranian > American Council, or NIAC, which has been accused of serving as Iran's > mouthpiece in Washington, D.C. > > > Since then, top members of the Obama administration's national security > team have launched a communications infrastructure after they left the > White House, and have told > <https://www.yahoo.com/news/obamas-white-house-alumni-fight-trump-tweet-for-tweet-earlier-and-harder-than-ever-before-115731181.html> > reporters > <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/09/the-keepin-it-1600-guys-launch-crooked-media-to-counter-trump.html> > > they are using that infrastructure to undermine Trump's foreign policy. > > > "It's actually Ben Rhodes, NIAC, and the Iranian mullahs who are > celebrating today," said one veteran foreign policy insider who is close to > Flynn and the White House. "They know that the number one target is Iran … > [and] they all knew their little sacred agreement with Iran was going to go > off the books. So they got rid of Flynn before any of the [secret] > agreements even surfaced." > > > Flynn had been preparing to publicize many of the details about the > nuclear deal that had been intentionally hidden by the Obama administration > as part of its effort to garner support for the deal, these sources said. > > > Flynn is now "gone before anybody can see what happened" with these secret > agreements, said the second insider close to Flynn and the White House. > > Sources in and out of the White House are concerned that the campaign > against Flynn will be extended to other prominent figures in the Trump > administration. > > > One senior White House official told the *Free Beacon* that leaks > targeting the former official were "not the result of a series of random > events." > > > "The drumbeat of leaks of sensitive material related to General Flynn has > been building since he was named to his position," said the official, who > is a member of the > > > White House's National Security Council. "Last night was not the result of > a series of random events. The president has lost a valuable adviser and we > need to make sure this sort of thing does not happen again." > > > Other sources expressed concern that public trust in the intelligence > community would be eroded by the actions of employees with anti-Trump > agendas. > > > "The larger issue that should trouble the American people is the > far-reaching power of unknown, unelected apparatchiks in the Intelligence > Community deciding for themselves both who serves in government and what is > an acceptable policy they will allow the elected representatives of the > people to pursue," said the national security adviser quoted above. > > > "Put aside the issue of Flynn himself; that nameless, faceless bureaucrats > were able to take out a president's national security adviser based on a > campaign of innuendo without evidence should worry every American," the > source explained. > > > Eli Lake, a Bloomberg View columnist and veteran national security > reporter well sourced in the White House, told the *Free Beacon* that > Flynn earned a reputation in the Obama administration as one of its top > detractors. > > > "Michael Flynn was one of the Obama administration's fiercest critics > after he was forced out of the Defense Intelligence Agency," said Lake, who > described "the political assassination of Michael Flynn > <https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-02-14/the-political-assassination-of-michael-flynn>" > > in his column published early Tuesday. > > > "[Flynn] was a withering critic of Obama's biggest foreign policy > initiative, the Iran deal," Lake said. "He also publicly accused the > administration of keeping classified documents found in the Osama bin Laden > raid that showed Iran's close relationship with al Qaeda. He was a thorn in > their side." > > > Lake noted in his column that he does not buy fully the White House's > official spin on Flynn's resignation. > > > "For a White House that has such a casual and opportunistic relationship > with the truth, it's strange that Flynn's ‘lie' to Pence would get him > fired," Lake wrote. "It doesn't add up." > > > White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer stated in his daily briefing that > "the evolving and eroding level of trust as a result of this situation and > a series of other questionable incidents is what led the president to ask > General Flynn for his resignation." > > > A third source who serves as a congressional adviser and was involved in > the 2015 fight over the Iran deal told the *Free Beacon* that the Obama > administration feared that Flynn would expose the secret agreements with > Iran. > > > "The Obama administration knew that Flynn was going to release the secret > documents around the Iran deal, which would blow up their myth that it was > a good deal that rolled back Iran," the source said. "So in December the > Obama NSC started going to work with their favorite reporters, selectively > leaking damaging and incomplete information about Flynn." > > > "After Trump was inaugurated some of those people stayed in and some began > working from the outside, and they cooperated to keep undermining Trump," > the source said, detailing a series of leaks from within the White House in > the past weeks targeting Flynn. "Last night's resignation was their first > major win, but unless the Trump people get serious about cleaning house, it > won't be the last." > > > > http://freebeacon.com/national-security/former-obama-officials-loyalists-waged-campaign-oust-flynn/ > > > So much for the peaceful transfer of power. These despicable democrats > will risk getting this country into war to keep their dirty secrets and in > revenge for having their useless asses handed to them by the voters in > November. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
