The Chickens Have Come Home to Roost
by Andrew P. Napolitano 
<http://original.antiwar.com/author/andrew-p-napolitano/>, February 23, 2017
Print This 
<http://original.antiwar.com/andrew-p-napolitano/2017/02/22/the-chickens-have-come-home-to-roost/print/>
 | Share This <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20>

Last week, *The Wall Street Journal* revealed that members of the 
intelligence community – part of the deep state, the unseen government 
within the government that does not change with elections – now have 
acquired so much data on everyone in America that they can selectively 
reveal it to reward their friends and harm their foes. Their principal foe 
today is the president of the United States.

Liberty is rarely lost overnight. The wall of tyranny often begins with 
benign building blocks of safety – each one lying on top of a predecessor – 
eventually collectively constituting an impediment to the exercise of free 
choices by free people, often not even recognized until it is too late.

Here is the back story.

In the pre-Revolutionary era, British courts in London secretly issued 
general warrants to British government agents in America. The warrants were 
not based on any probable cause of crime or individual articulable 
suspicion; they did not name the person or thing to be seized or identify 
the place to be searched. They authorized agents to search where they 
wished and seize what they found.

The use of general warrants was so offensive to our Colonial ancestors that 
it whipped up more serious opposition to British rule and support for the 
revolutionaries than the "no taxation without representation" argument did. 
And when it came time for Americans to write the Constitution, they 
prohibited general warrants in the Fourth Amendment, the whole purpose of 
which was to guarantee the right to be left alone by forcing the government 
to focus on bad guys and prohibit it from engaging in fishing expeditions. 
But the fishing expeditions would come.

In 1978, Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which 
was intended to rein in the government spying on Americans that had been 
unleashed by the Nixon administration. FISA established a secret court and 
permitted it to issue warrants authorizing spying on agents of foreign 
governments when physically present in the United States.

People born in foreign countries who are here for benevolent or benign or 
even evil purposes have the same constitutional protections as those of us 
born here. That’s because the critical parts of the Constitution that 
insulate human freedom from the government’s reach protect "persons," not 
just citizens. But FISA ignored that.

And FISA was easy for the government to justify. It was a pullback from 
Richard Nixon’s lawlessness. It required the feds to seek a warrant from 
federal judges. The targets were not Americans. Never mind, the argument 
went, that FISA has no requirement of showing any probable cause of crime 
or even articulable suspicion on the part of the foreign target; this will 
keep us safe. Besides, the government insisted, it can’t be used against 
Americans.

That argument was bought by presidents, members of Congress and nearly all 
federal courts that examined it. We don’t know whether the authors of this 
scheme really wanted federal spies to be able to spy on anyone at will, but 
that is where we are today. Through secret courts whose judges cannot keep 
records of their own decisions and secret permissions by select committees 
of Congress whose members cannot tell their constituents or other members 
of Congress what they have learned in secret, FISA has morphed so as to 
authorize spying down a slippery slope of targets, from foreign agents to 
all foreigners to anyone who communicates with foreigners to anyone capable 
of communicating with them.

The surveillance state regime today permits America’s 60,000 military and 
civilian domestic spies to access in real time all the landline and mobile 
telephone calls and all the desktop and mobile device keystrokes and all 
the digital data created and used by anyone in the United States. The 
targets today are not just ordinary Americans; they are justices on the 
Supreme Court, military brass in the Pentagon, agents in the FBI, local 
police in cities and towns, and the man in the Oval Office.

The British system that arguably impelled our secession in 1776 is now here 
on steroids.

Enter the outsider as president. Donald Trump has condemned the spying and 
leaking, as he is a victim of it. While he was president-elect, the spies 
told him they knew of his alleged misbehaviors – vehemently denied – in a 
Moscow hotel room. Last week, his White House staff was shaken by what the 
spies did with what they learned from a former Trump aide.

Trump’s former national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, 
himself a former military spy, spoke to the Russian ambassador to the 
United States in December via telephone in Trump Tower. It was a benign 
conversation. He knew it was being monitored, as he is a former monitor of 
such communications. But he mistakenly thought that those who were 
monitoring him were patriots as he is. They were not.

They violated federal law by revealing in part what Flynn had said, and 
they did so in a manner to embarrass and infuriate Trump.

Why would they do this? Perhaps because they feared Flynn’s being in the 
White House, since he knows the power and depth of the deep state. Perhaps 
to send a message to Trump because he once compared American spies to 
Nazis. Perhaps because they believe that their judgment of the foreign 
dangers America faces is superior to the president’s. Perhaps because they 
hate and fear the outsider in the White House.

The chickens have come home to roost. In our misguided efforts to keep the 
country safe, we have neglected to keep it free. We have enabled a deep 
state to become powerful enough to control a powerful president. We have 
placed so much data and so much power in the hands of unelected, 
unaccountable, opaque spies that they can use it as they see fit – even to 
the point of committing federal felonies. Now some have boasted that they 
can manipulate and thus control the president of the United States by 
selectively revealing and concealing what they know about anyone, including 
the president himself.

This is a perilous state of affairs, brought about by the maniacal passion 
for surveillance spawned under George W. Bush and perfected under Barack 
Obama – all with utter indifference to the widespread constitutional 
violations and permanent destruction of personal liberties. This is not the 
government the Framers gave us. But it is one far more dangerous to human 
freedom than the one from which they seceded in 1776.

*Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, 
is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has 
written seven books on the US Constitution. The most recent is* Suicide 
Pact: The Radical Expansion of Presidential Powers and the Lethal Threat to 
American Liberty 
<http://www.amazon.com/Suicide-Pact-Expansion-Presidential-American/dp/0718021932/antiwarbookstore>*.
 
To find out more about Judge Napolitano and to read features by other 
Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com 
<http://www.creators.com/>.*

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to