>From Nov. 7.


—S.




https://heatst.com/world/exclusive-fbi-granted-fisa-warrant-
covering-trump-camps-ties-to-russia/
EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have
confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court
warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the
activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.

Contrary to earlier reporting in the New York Times
<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html>,
which cited FBI sources as saying that the agency did not believe that the
private server in Donald Trump’s Trump Tower which was connected to a
Russian bank
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html>
had any nefarious purpose, the FBI’s counter-intelligence arm, sources say,
re-drew an earlier FISA court request around possible financial and banking
offenses related to the server. The first request, which, sources say,
named Trump, was denied back in June, but the second was drawn more
narrowly and was granted in October after evidence was presented of a
server, possibly related to the Trump campaign, and its alleged links to
two banks; SVB Bank and Russia’s Alfa Bank.
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html>
While
the *Times *story speaks of metadata, sources suggest that a FISA warrant
was granted to look at the full content of emails and other related
documents that may concern US persons.

The FBI agents who talked to the New York Times
<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html>,
and rubbished the ground-breaking stories of
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html>Slate
(
Franklin Foer) and Mother Jones
<http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/veteran-spy-gave-fbi-info-alleging-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump>
(David Corn) may not have known about the FISA warrant, sources say,
because the counter-intelligence and criminal sides of the FBI often work
independently of each other employing the principle of
‘compartmentalization’.

The FISA warrant was granted in connection with the investigation
of suspected activity between the server and two banks, SVB Bank and Alfa
Bank. However, it is thought in the intelligence community that the warrant
covers any ‘US person’ connected to this investigation, and thus covers
Donald Trump and at least three further men who have either formed part of
his campaign or acted as his media surrogates. The warrant was sought, they
say, because actionable intelligence on the matter provided by friendly
foreign agencies could not properly be examined without a warrant by US
intelligence as it involves ‘US Persons’ who come under the remit of the
FBI and not the CIA. Should a counter-intelligence investigation lead to
criminal prosecutions, sources say, the Justice Department is concerned
that the chain of evidence have a basis in a clear  warrant.

In June, when the first FISA warrant was denied, the FBI was reportedly
alarmed at Carter Page’s trip to Moscow and meetings with Russian
officials, one week before the DNC was hacked. Counter intelligence
agencies later reported to both Presidential candidates that Russia had
carried out this hack; Donald Trump said publicly in the third debate that
‘our country has no idea’ if Russia did the hacking. The discovery of the
Trump Tower private Russian server, however, communicating with Alfa Bank,
changed matters, sources report.

To further complicate the story, the FISA warrant was allegedly granted in
part because of the involvement of Vladimir Putin’s own daughters. One is
married to a senior official at Gazprom, where Carter Page and Paul
Manafort reportedly have holdings; another to Kirill Shamalov, a banking
official.

The fact that the alleged warrant was a FISA warrant is itself significant.
The court exists to grant warrants to examine cases concerned with Foreign
Intelligence.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United
States Government for *approval of electronic surveillance, physical
search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. *
Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and
due to the need to protect classified national security information.

Bradley P. Moss is a national security lawyer. He told us:

If a FISA warrant was issued, it does not necessarily mean that the court
considered any U.S. persons as literal ‘spies.’ I can imagine an argument
having been made that there was probable cause to believe they were “agents
of influence” who were unwittingly being influenced by a foreign power.

If the operation concerns suspected money laundering involving a foreign
government, the FISA warrant could theoretically encompass U.S. persons in
that limited context. A FISA warrant is authorization to collect evidence,
not to arrest.

On October 9th, the Trump campaign released a large number of documents
pointing out what they alleged were Hillary Clinton’s
<https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/clintons-close-ties-to-putin-deserve-scrutiny>
ties to Russia.  On October 12th, rumors of a FISA warrant started to
surface online.  Donald Trump’s campaign had not answered requests for
comment on the matter at time of going to press.

https://twitter.com/robertcaruso/status/786382771128107008

@1CheekyLilMe1 <https://twitter.com/1CheekyLilMe1> @MrDane1982
<https://twitter.com/MrDane1982> There was ex FBI Counter Intelligence
agent on @amjoyshow <https://twitter.com/amjoyshow> he said; don't be
surprised FISA court warrant fr Trump

— Tim (@russelltim151) 2:00 AM - 6 Nov 2016
<https://twitter.com/russelltim151/status/795068377245032449>



------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGVtcnYwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0ODkzNDY5NDI->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcTg5NHV0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ4OTM0Njk0Mg-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to