http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/65927



Very precise, articulate reasoning.



*Tuesday, 21 March 2017*

*Is Sharia Law Compatible With US Laws and the US Constitution? *

by Gary Fouse

[image: Description:
http://www.newenglishreview.org/files/100/Image/sharia-free-zone.png]

Currently, many states are attempting to pass-or have passed- legislation
which would preclude other forms of law being incorporated into state law.
To be specific, the particular law they are trying to avoid is Islamic
law-sharia (though they must avoid specifically targeting Islamic law as
opposed to those of other religions). Correspondingly, Islamic leaders in
the US are trying to combat this trend and prevent said laws from being
passed. On one front, Muslim leaders in the US are involved in a public
relations drive to convince non-Muslims that sharia law is perfectly
compatible
<http://garyfouse.blogspot.com/2012/02/town-hall-at-islamic-center-of-orange.html>
with
the US Constitution and US law. It is not, and it is very easy to prove it.

Sharia in Arabic means, "straight path." In the early time of Islam it
referred to the straight path to water, life's necessity. Since Islam is
designed to guide virtually every aspect of the believer's life, sharia is
quite detailed. Its two main sources are the Qu'ran and the Sunnah
(sayings, actions and approvals of the Prophet Mohammad). Its
interpretation through the centuries has come from the learned Islamic
scholars.

Much of sharia is benign and related to principles of how one worships,
marriage, divorce, financial rights etc. There are also civil and criminal
aspects and punishments for criminal violations. Aside from the obvious
discriminatory details regarding women and non-Muslims, it is in the area
of criminal punishments that sharia is most problematic.

This past weekend, I attended a day-long seminar
<http://garyfouse.blogspot.com/2017/03/selling-sharia.html> presented by
the (Islamic) Institute of Knowledge in Diamond Bar, California on the
topic of sharia. This was the third such event I have attended. While the
very capable presenters explained sharia well and defended it, they
 included an explanation of the most problematical part of sharia, that is
*hudud* sharia, which covers fixed punishments for "crimes against God".
According to what was presented, there are 5 "crimes" included in *hudud*. (
*Hudud* is plural of *hadd*, which means "boundary" in Arabic.)

1 Unlawful sex-which may be adultery involving married people having sex
outside of marriage or fornication involving unmarried people. According to
the Qu'ran, the latter is punishable by 100 lashes, and the former by
stoning.

2 Accusing someone falsely of unlawful sex, which is punishable by 80
lashes.

3 Theft, which is punishable by cutting off the hand.

4 Drinking alcohol- 80 lashes.

5 Highway robbery, which is considered a more serious form of theft
especially if it involves death. This form of robbery is punishable by
death.

What the presenters attempted to do was quickly point out that the
standards of proof for these crimes are extremely high to the point of
making conviction and administering the above punishments almost
impossible. For example, the adultery charge requires confession and 4
*male* witnesses (emphasis mine).

I could stop right here with my thesis that sharia is not compatible with
US laws, but there is so much more. We have not even gotten to the "crimes"
of apostasy and blasphemy yet. We were told Saturday that apostasy and
blasphemy are not covered under *hudud*.  Well and good, but they are still
out there. The subject of apostasy really only came up due to audience
questions (mine), which had to be written on note cards and passed to the
front hopefully to be selected. We were told that in a non-Muslim country,
the decision to leave Islam is between that person and God. In a Muslim
country, it was explained that the apostate would be given 4 chances to
repent and return to Islam before any sentence could be carried out. It was
also explained that even in Muslim lands, if a person left Islam quietly,
they would be left alone, but if they "undermine the state or stir up
trouble," they would be guilty of treason and the death penalty would
apply. (I was told once by a Saudi lawyer that in his country, an accused
apostate gets 3 chances to repent before being executed.)

So as not to engage in overkill, let's cut to the chase. It is irrelevant
whether or not the standards of proof are ridiculously high. It is
irrelevant whether or not a person gets the chance to repent. What is
relevant is that in our country, we don't even have laws against drinking
(adults), adultery or fornication. Nor do we have laws against apostasy or
blasphemy. Yet under sharia law, these are considered crimes and merit
either the death penalty or lashing. We must also reject any law that
discriminates against women or against those who do not belong to a
particular faith-in this case Islam. Furthermore, in modern (nation-state)
times, treason is considered betraying one's nation-not one's religion.

These aspects of sharia are clearly not compatible with our values and our
laws. Every person living in the US-Muslim or non-Muslim- is entitled to
enjoy every single protection that our constitution offers. Properly
drafted, laws that preclude any outside law (including sharia) from being
considered or recognized in our own laws should be passed.




------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdDZwdnBmBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0OTAxMjc3MjM->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlM3VhcGVuBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ5MDEyNzcyMw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to