it is a very valid question, murky, which you dismiss because you are unable to answer it. face it murky, your fairness doctrine is nothing more than a doctrine to silence conservative opposition to the socialist dems. to be fair it would cover all news outlets would it not? wouldn't it murky?
On Nov 10, 6:25 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it is a stupid question with no basis in fact . but then that is to be > expected from you ! the fairness doctrine covers all news outlets . > now please post the link showing where the fairness doctrine has been > ruled unconstitutional as you claimed . > > On Nov 10, 6:19 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > come on murky, answer me. if this is so "fair", why does it only > > apply to the one area dominated by conservatives, talk radio, and > > ignore the liberal dominated papers, and tv news? how come murky? > > easy question. > > > On Nov 10, 4:55 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > you haven't started yet fish boy none of those things you mentioned > > > are unconstitutional . > > > > On Nov 10, 4:37 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The Fairness Doctrine. > > > > > Social Programs. > > > > > Abortions funded by the Government. > > > > > Shall I go on? > > > > > On Nov 10, 1:31 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > please list even one policy of the DNC that conflicts with the > > > > > constitution ! > > > > > > On Nov 9, 9:00 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Bullshit. > > > > > > > You have proven you support Socialism and the Democratic Party, over > > > > > > the Constitution, on every Issue where they conflict. > > > > > > > Imagine that. > > > > > > > On Nov 8, 7:53 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > i support the constitution 100% > > > > > > > which is why i support the fairness doctrine ! > > > > > > > On Nov 8, 8:55 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > you would cheer the destruction of the constitution, wouldn't ya > > > > > > > > murky? commie > > > > > > > > > On Nov 8, 8:20 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > excellent news ! > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 8, 7:26 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Democrat Henry Rivera, a former commissioner of the Federal > > > > > > > > > > Communications Commission, is expected to head > > > > > > > > > > President-elect Barack > > > > > > > > > > Obama's FCC transition team, a move that has sparked fear > > > > > > > > > > in media > > > > > > > > > > circles that the Fairness Doctrine may return to silence > > > > > > > > > > conservative > > > > > > > > > > talk radio. > > > > > > > > > > > If reenacted, the "Fairness Doctrine" would require > > > > > > > > > > broadcasts over > > > > > > > > > > the public airwaves to give equal time to opposing > > > > > > > > > > political views. > > > > > > > > > > For talk radio, which boomed after the law's repeal in 1987 > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > building an audience devoted to conservative talk, the > > > > > > > > > > law's return > > > > > > > > > > would decimate the industry's marketability. > > > > > > > > > > > Many fear the "Fairness Doctrine" would drive talk radio > > > > > > > > > > hosts – like > > > > > > > > > > Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Savage – out of > > > > > > > > > > business. > > > > > > > > > > > Brian Maloney of the blog The Radio Equalizer said in his > > > > > > > > > > post, "Meet > > > > > > > > > > Talk's Executioner," he believes Rivera will use his > > > > > > > > > > position to > > > > > > > > > > bring back the law for that very purpose. > > > > > > > > > > > Rivera, according to Maloney, "is expected to lead the push > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > dismantle commercial talk radio that is favored by a number > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > Democratic Party senators. Rivera will play a pivotal role > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > preventing critics from having a public voice during > > > > > > > > > > Obama's tenure in > > > > > > > > > > office." > > > > > > > > > > >http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80424-Hidequot... > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
