Agreed.... I still keep an open mind, but I am leery of the big, big, really really big conspiracy theories.
I think it could prove interesting if Kim DotCom proffers something tangible, but DotCom also has some baggage and I'm unsure of his legitimacy. On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 1:45 PM, chirpinginnc <[email protected]> wrote: > I just knew I had read numerous places that he died from two gunshots in > the back. I guess then the shooters ran off without robbing him. Too bad > none of the numerous cameras in the area got any footage of shooting, eh? > > > On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 1:41:23 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >> >> Hey Chirping! (Good to see ya on this side of the street!) >> >> Good Question..... >> >> After your post, I went and looked for the video that I saw, and can no >> longer locate it. Now, I question what it was that I saw. I remember >> thinking that it was legitimate, from some site like LiveLeak or TMZ; but >> damned if I can find it today. >> >> I did find this, which makes me think that the video I saw was bogus: >> >> https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/6cttkj/i_started >> _mapping_the_cctv_cameras_near_the_seth/ >> >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 1:20 PM, chirpinginnc <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> How did he die from two shots in the back if he wasn't shot "from the >>> back?" >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 10:04:30 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>> >>>> Good Morning Bill! >>>> >>>> Not exactly. >>>> >>>> There's a video of the encounter, where two men accost Rich; before he >>>> falls to the ground. Not much can be made from the video but he most >>>> definitely wasn't shot from the back. >>>> >>>> I've been following this story very closely, and it's not exactly as >>>> this article portrays. Just as important, had I been Sean Hannity and FOX >>>> News; I too would have pulled back until I see something more conclusive. >>>> >>>> The P.I.; Rod Wheeler has now admitted that he's never seen the laptop >>>> that Rich purportedly communicated with Wiki-Leaks with; thus there's no >>>> substantive evidence that Rich shared the DNC or Podesta e-mails to Wiki. >>>> The lobbyist who hired Wheeler and has been conducting the investigation on >>>> behalf of the Rich Family, (who are die hard liberal Democrats!) claims >>>> that he's not seen any evidence linking Rich to Wiki; although there has >>>> been some collaboration that Rich did have e-mails to Assange & >>>> Wiki-Leaks.... >>>> >>>> Meanwhile; the family has bitched and moaned about the release of >>>> information that links Seth to leaking information, without more >>>> substantive evidence; and to date, there has been none. >>>> >>>> Enter Kim DotCom, a resident of New Zealand; who claims that he knew >>>> Rich on line, and that he has proof! Sounds legit; but DotCom has a warrant >>>> out for him here in the U.S. and the government has been trying to >>>> extradite DotCom; so until DotCom releases what he's purportedly got; I >>>> would form no conclusions yet! >>>> >>>> ===================== >>>> >>>> *#SETHRICH WAS A HERO* >>>> >>>> I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK. >>>> >>>> I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me >>>> to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called >>>> himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich. >>>> >>>> Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other >>>> technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful. >>>> >>>> I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption >>>> and the influence of corporate money in politics. >>>> >>>> “He wanted to change that from the inside.” >>>> I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg >>>> in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange >>>> and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the >>>> upcoming election. >>>> >>>> The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to >>>> their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable. >>>> >>>> I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement >>>> should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that >>>> there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the >>>> authorities regarding the proper process. >>>> >>>> If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be >>>> prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a >>>> guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of >>>> safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming >>>> days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the >>>> necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment. >>>> >>>> STATEMENT FROM >>>> KIM DOTCOM >>>> http://kim.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Kim Dotcom >>>> Internet freedom fighter >>>> KIM.COM >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Hot4azintop via PoliticalForum < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Strange finding here.....reported he was shot in the back and no items >>>>> were missing from his person and authorities concluded it was a robbery >>>>> gone wrong? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Click here: The Seth Rich Story Has TERRIFIED Democrats and the Media >>>>> – Fix This Nation .com >>>>> <http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/the-seth-rich-story-has-terrified-democrats-and-the-media/> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
