"That there were no back channel communications between the Trump campaign and the Russians during the election"
Yahtzee On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 7:27:10 AM UTC-5, MJ wrote: > > > Tuesday, May 30, 2017 > > *The One Thing the "Intelligence" Community Leak About Kushner Does Tell > Us About Team Trump *Robert Wenzel > > As I have previously reported > <http://www.targetliberty.com/2017/05/through-looking-glassjared-kushner.html>, > > the *Washington Post* has published a story that, in early December, > Jared Kushner and Russia’s ambassador to Washington discussed the > possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel > between Trump’s presidential transition team and the Kremlin. > > No doubt the WaPo story is coming from US intelligence sources. In the > story, WaPo told us as much: Ambassador Sergey Kislyak reported to his > superiors in Moscow that Kushner, son-in-law and confidant to > then-President-elect Trump, made the proposal during a meeting on Dec. 1 or > 2 at Trump Tower, according to intercepts of Russian communications that > were reviewed by U.S. officials. > > So what does this definitely tell us? > > That there were no back channel communications between the Trump campaign > and the Russians during the election. Otherwise, Kushner would not have > brought the topic up in such a ham-handed fashion in December. He would > have used any previous back channel communication method to discuss more > security for the communications. Not a new discussion with an apparently > surprised Russian Ambassador Kislyak. > > The "intelligence" community that hates Trump just gave Team Trump some > pretty decent evidence that there was no back channel communication between > Team Trump and Russia during the campaign. This is a bizarre attack on > Kushner and Team Trump. > > There is no logic here, It is just throwing scare headlines up against the > wall. > > Further, as I have previously pointed out > <http://www.targetliberty.com/2017/05/through-looking-glassjared-kushner.html>, > > not even the masses believe a back-channel is going to do anything but ease > tensions with Russia: They don't really think Trump is going to sell > Putin Detroit. They don't really think Trump is going to cut Putin in on > withholding tax income. They don't even think that Trump has secretly > agreed to put Putin on US social security. > > Kushner was setting up a back-channel to talk a deal over Syria and > sanctions on Russia, These are noble causes to discuss. They are not > unsimilar to back-channels in previous administrations > <http://www.targetliberty.com/2017/05/through-looking-glassjared-kushner.html> > . > > And, I repeat, if Kushner was just attempting to set this back-channel up > in December, the "intelligence" community leak just proved that the Trump > administration did not have a back-channel before the election. > > > > http://www.targetliberty.com/2017/05/the-one-thing-intelligence-community.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TargetLiberty+%28Target+Liberty%29 > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
