Good Morning Lobo! No doubt the sources of information that you quite obviously subscribe to portrayed;
(1) Deputy AG Rosenstein as a liar; and, (2) That President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey in an attempt to halt or do away with the "*Russia Russia Russia*" investigation. This is just one more reason why you really need to expand your sources of information and be very cautious of the false, misleading and literally "Fake News" and yellow journalism that you are so exposed to Lobo! The truth, is that Rosenstein testified within a week of President Trump's comments and of writing the letter; stating emphatically that the letter conveyed his, and most of the FBI Upper Management's sentiments. President Trump has listed a number of reasons for firing James Comey, (which he didn't have to do!) but I think it's quite obvious that the main reason Trump fired Comey was Comey's failure to go public and announce (as he had to Congressional Leadership and to most everyone within the D.C. Beltway!) that the President was not under investigation in the Russia matter. It's now obvious that Comey is literally a snake, and a part & parcel of the corrupt D.C. Beltway elitist Deep State "Swamp". He needed to go, post haste. Look for Mueller to most likely resign because of his conflicts with Comey early this week.... On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Lobo <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy, Keith. > > Say... isn't Rosenstein the Deputy AG who wrote that memo basing the Comey > firing on the FBI Director having been mean to Hillary, only to be exposed > as a liar the next day by Trump, when he admitted that he fired Comey to > try to make the investigation go away (aka "obstruction of justice")? > > Actually, the press has always used "Anonymous Sources", just as police > and counter-intelligence agencies use "anonymous informants" to catch > crooks and stop terror attacks. Without "anonymous sources" like "Deep > throat", we never would have known about Watergate. > > > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 12:35:00 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >> >> Hey Kam! >> >> (Good to say "Hey" to ya!) >> >> I saw this! Makes one think that the "Leak" out of Mueller's office >> about purportedly investigating President Trump on obstruction charges, is >> Bull Hockey! (And/Or purposely planted!) I think Mueller could be losing >> his swagger inside the DC Beltway! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Kamakazee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Whaaaa? Including the leaks by a certain head of the Federal BI? >>> >>> In a move that stunned many members of the media, on Thursday night >>> Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is overseeing the Russia probe >>> due to Jeff Sessions' recusal and who earlier this week confirmed only he >>> has authority to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, released an >>> unorthodox statement to be “*skeptical about anonymous allegations*” >>> following the relentless barrage of news reports emerging from the WaPo and >>> the NYT about the evolving probe into Russia’s "election interference" and >>> possible collusion with Trump, all based on "anonymous sources." >>> >>> "Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories >>> attributed to anonymous 'officials,' particularly when they do not identify >>> the country — let alone the branch or agency of government — with which the >>> alleged sources supposedly are affiliated. Americans should be skeptical >>> about anonymous allegations. The Department of Justice has a >>> long-established policy to neither confirm nor deny such allegations. >>> >>> Rosenstein, who many had seen as a Trump foil at the DOJ, did not cite >>> specific reports. The DOJ released Rosenstein’s statement after 9 p.m., >>> shortly after The Washington Post *reported that the special counsel * >>> <http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-15/jared-kushner-under-investigation-special-counsel-wapo>was >>> investigating the business dealings of Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s >>> son-in-law and adviser. That report was attributed to unnamed American >>> officials. >>> >>> As we said, the media and punditry was "stunned" by the official >>> statement: the NYT' Maggie Haberman said "Have literally never seen a >>> statement like this." The new leader of the Trump "resistance", Preet >>> Bharara also chimed in, tweeting "Americans should also exercise caution >>> before accepting as true lies about firing of FBI Director & defamation of >>> a war hero special counsel" >>> >>> Americans should also exercise caution before accepting as true lies >>> about firing of FBI Director & defamation of a war hero special counsel >>> *pic.twitter.com/KQUPpppcAI* <https://t.co/KQUPpppcAI> >>> >>> — Preet Bharara (@PreetBharara) *June 16, 2017* >>> <https://twitter.com/PreetBharara/status/875574534144839680> >>> >>> To be expected, Rosenstein - who the media was ambivalent about and >>> following his recent testimony in which he said there was "no grounds" to >>> fire Mueller, praised - promptly became the latest pariah for insinuating >>> that the media's Trump reportage may be, in fact, fake news. >>> >>> As the *NYT reported this morning, * >>> <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/16/us/politics/rod-rosenstein-anonymous-sources.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=0>the >>> "*statement aligned with the president’s open frustration with >>> unflattering leaks. Mr. Trump has called stories about the investigation >>> “fake news” and complained on Twitter about a Washington Post report on >>> Wednesday night that the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, was >>> investigating the president himself for possible obstruction of justice. >>> *That >>> story was also attributed to unnamed sources, as was a New York Times >>> article that same evening about Mr. Mueller’s request for interviews with >>> three top intelligence officials." >>> >>> http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-16/stunning-announceme >>> nt-doj-warns-americans-not-trust-stories-based-anonymous-official >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
