No Way to Provide for the Common Defense!

by AMBASSADOR HENRY F. COOPER
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/detail/ambassador-henry-f-cooper>
July 26, 2017

*"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of
Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America."*

Honest men can disagree. But as John Adams said, "*Facts are stubborn
things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates
of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." *Or as
former Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) said,* "Everyone is entitled
to his own opinion, but not his own facts."  *

So, this morning, I want to emphasize some facts for you to consider in
judging an important outcome of the pending congressional actions on the
National Defense Authorization Act for 2018 - the NDAA(2018). These facts
deal with the future of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United
States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, or as it is usually
referred to, the EMP Commission.

This urgent issue is not likely to receive much public or congressional
attention, which no doubt will focus on "bigger ticket" Department of
Defense (DoD) matters - even though the EMP vulnerability of the nation's
electric power grid is a major problem for military operations and
preparedness within the United States, and our ability to fight the
nation's wars overseas as well as an existential threat to all Americans.
Consider:

*Some Facts:*

   - The EMP Commission was first constituted in 2001, in response to
   congressional concerns that in large measure grew from a meeting several
   House Members had in the late 1990s with several Russian Generals. Then
   Representative Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) - one of Congress' only scientists -
   and others, including then Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services
   Committee (HASC) Curt Weldon (R-PA), were most impressed by the Generals'
   flat out statement that Russia could destroy the United States with EMP.
   (Rep. Weldon also co-chaired the Duma-Congress Study Group, the official
   inter-parliamentary relationship between the United States and Russia, and
   speaks Russian - so there was no missing the meaning of the Russian
   Generals' claim.)
   - The appointed and approved Commissioners are recognized senior
   scientific, engineering and military authorities, most having been actively
   involved in rectifying the EMP vulnerabilities of our strategic systems and
   their supporting command, control and communications systems, since the
   political and military authorities first recognized that serious threat in
   the 1960s following the 1962 Starfish Prime high-altitude test formulated
   in response to the Soviet high-altitude test series that broke their 1958
   Atmospheric Test Moratorium. EMP then became a highly classified matter,
   leaving the public and most of its public officials uninformed - an
   ignorance that still prevails.
   - The Commissioners have served without compensation for most of the
   past 16 years in three installments.  The first (2001-05) produced a
   heavily classified report in 2004 (briefed to a closed session of congress)
   and an associated unclassified Executive Summary. The second (2007-8)
   produced a major unclassified report in 2008.  Click here
   <http://www.empcommission.org/reports.php> for both public reports,
   which provide the most authoritative open source information on the
   existential EMP threat to all Americans.
   - The third installment was re-established by the FY 2016 Defense
   Authorization Act on November 25, 2015, and supported by appropriated funds
   on December 18, 2015, with a report due date of June 30, 2017. But the DoD
   stalled re-establishing the Commission for almost a year before the
   congressionally reinstated commission could hold its first meeting in
   January 2017.
   - *Now, after less than six months work, the DoD has directed the
   Commission to be dis-established with its final report due six days from
   now on July 31, so far with the complicity of the congressional leadership.*
   - *Moreover, the HASC proposed NDAA(2018) legislation (approved by the
   full House) disestablishes the Commission before it can review the final
   draft of its final report, and reestablishes another - a recipe for
   disruption and further delay while new commissioners are appointed, etc*.

   - Meanwhile, the existential EMP threat to the American People is not
   being treated seriously, especially by the DoD that considers, with some
   justification, the protection of the nation's critical civil infrastructure
   and particularly its electric power grid not to be among its
   responsibilities, even though it depends on those grids for its logistical
   and operational support.
   - *The DoD has not effectively transferred its knowledge of EMP
   environments, effects and associated countermeasures to other agencies of
   the government and to private and public organizations that provide
   critical national infrastructures, such as electrical power and
   communications utilities*.
   - To the contrary, the Department of Defense is withholding from public
   distribution, and even has classified key data and technology that
   underlies protection against EMP, including the U.S. version of key test
   results provided in the 1990s by Russian scientists to U.S. scientists and
   engineers.

*My Opinions**:*

   - My opinions are well known to the readers of my weekly High Frontier
   messages - and to any who seek them. Washington is badly broken and I don't
   expect to see it repaired anytime soon. For an elaboration of this
   conclusion, click here
   
<http://highfrontier.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Testimony-Senate-Energy-Committeer-170504-1.pdf>
   for my May 4, 2017 written testimony to the Senate Energy and Natural
   Resources Committee - and here
   
<http://highfrontier.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Testimony-Cooper-QFRs-from-the-5-4-17-SENR-Cmte-Hrg-final.pdf>
   to the Q&As for the record. Also testifying was former House Speaker Newt
   Gingrich, with whom I agreed on essentially every point he made.
   - Not so for much of what other witnesses had to say - though I do not
   question their sincerity as they seek to relearn lessons that were
   understood many years ago in highly classified studies and tests to assure
   the protection of our strategic systems and their essential command,
   control and communications systems. I do not protest their efforts to learn
   about these facts - indeed it is important that they do. But I do object to
   not exploiting what is well known by the DoD community that has been
   engaged for decades in hardening against these effects.
   - Click here
   
<https://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings-and-business-meetings?ID=6878D1AC-26E6-4FEB-B301-FBC7111270FE>
   for a video of the complete hearing, beginning with Senator Murkowski's
   introduction between 23 and 24 minutes in. Click here
   <http://highfrontier.org/may-9-2017-hush-hush-sweet-charlotte/> for my
   High Frontier message following this important hearing, which summarizes an
   important letter from the EMP Commission's Chairman to Secretary of Energy
   Rick Perry, to which I referred in my testimony, and its implications - to
   which there has as yet been no response.
   - *This hearing and my overall impressions lead me to conclude that the
   EMP Commission is the only technically competent moderating influence in
   understanding and charting associated ways to rectify the dysfunctional
   Federal Government in protecting the American people against this
   existential threat*.
   - To disestablish the EMP Commission would at best assure delays in
   countering this threat - and at worst could create major misdirection as
   currently uninformed technologists relearn lessons that were understood a
   half century ago, with likely unneeded delays and unwarranted expense.
   - It is true that many of the Commissioners are quite senior and some
   would like to move on to other matters, but their knowledge and experience
   acquired over the past 50-years will be lost if there is not a process
   established for handing off what they have learned to the next generation.
   So new technically qualified Commissioners will be needed to take the
   handoff from the existing Commissioners. *Rather than starting over
   completely, it makes much more sense to have the current Commissioners
   continue and screen replacements for those Commissioners who want to
   retire, with the appropriate thanks from a grateful nation*.
   - That approach also will permit the current Commissioners to review the
   rapidly prepared draft report that will be delivered to OSD next Monday;
   avoid an unnecessary hiatus in the Commission's activities; and for the
   appropriate Executive and Legislative authorities to seek their views on
   how best to address the major institutional problems associated with the
   above facts, evident at least to me.
   - *Chief among them is the obvious fact that the DoD has not been a
   responsible agent/steward for protecting the nation's critical
   infrastructure. Indeed, there is no federal department or agency that has
   the needed broad charter to deal effectively with this urgent, existential
   threat to all Americans*.
   - *Thus, some appropriate authority in the White House, appointed by the
   President with unfettered access to him, should be given the needed
   authority and held accountable for assuring the American people are
   protected from this existential EMP threat, as quickly as possible*.

*Bottom Lines**.*

Congressional treatment of this EMP Commission issue is, so far, "no way to
provide for the common defense . . .*" *  as all Federal Government
authorities are sworn to do.

The HASC-House NDAA(2018) proposal to disestablish the current EMP
Commission should not be allowed to continue, and there is little time to
assure a better outcome.

*The Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) could correct this course in
its consideration of the issue in its floor debate on its version of the
NDAA(2018) and/or in the subsequent House-Senate  Conference* that must
agree on the final NDAA(2018) to be sent to President Trump.

Or the President could veto the proposed NDAA(2018) if it not fixed.

The well-being of the nation hangs in the balance, literally.



Read more: Family Security Matters
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/no-way-to-provide-for-the-common-defense?f=must_reads#ixzz4nz6kQEvo>
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/no-
way-to-provide-for-the-common-defense?f=must_reads#ixzz4nz6kQEvo
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0>

<https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-3176-a?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-3176-a>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-3176-a?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-3176-a>
<#m_-620518878745667522_m_764911226170789575_m_-900391297035831768_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>


__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZWtiZml0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE1MDExMTI4NTA->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbTE2azg3BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTUwMTExMjg1MA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to