d.b. Why do you even make an attempt to defend such moronic statements? You only make yourself look even more foolish. You take an article about increased bike sales due to increased gasoline prices and attempt to use that to justify your statement? That's just fucking sad and pitiful.
On Nov 10, 11:57 am, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 10, 10:56 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > d.b. > > > Show be where President-Elect Obama has "mandated" bicycles. > > [Q] - As Fuel Prices Climb Higher, So Do Bicycle Sales > -http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/14/business/bike.php > > "Mandate" by proxy. In Obama's case, a mendacious proxy. > > "Perhaps" - Are you suggesting Barack WON'T raise fuel prices? And > before you answer, keep in mind that Paul Volker, John Podesta, and > Rahm Emanuel can afford 5, 10, or $100 gas. Which is perfectly > consistent with Michelle's burning desire to impoverish the white > middle-class. > > Meanwhile, if you want literal translations, stop by Rev. Wright's > church. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
