Would Congress- esp. the Senate- give up its salary and benefits? No.//
The reduced price of oil/gasoline will delay change of habits and a
real effort to address energy issues.//American Express also needs a
bailout.//Bailouts are becoming a new heavenly salvation! Soon, no one
will pay their bills- why bother? Sad.

On Nov 12, 2:17 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bailouts for banks: Layoffs for workers
> 12 November 2008
>
> Working people in the United States are confronting a wave of layoffs
> that is sweeping through every sector of the economy, with devastating
> social implications. The same prospect confronts workers in a host of
> other countries.
>
> With the US economy now shedding approximately a quarter million jobs
> a month, the ranks of those officially counted as unemployed have
> swollen to more than 10 million. Over 6 million more have been
> relegated to involuntary part-time work, and nearly 2 million have
> fallen off the charts because they have ceased actively looking for a
> job. Younger workers trying to get their first job are increasingly
> finding the door to entry-level employment slammed shut.
>
> Nearly one out of eight American workers is now unemployed or
> underemployed, and this at what most economists acknowledge to be only
> the onset of a recession and the beginning of what looks to be a very
> cold winter.
>
> In the first week of this month alone, a range of companies announced
> a combined total of 15,000 layoffs. The past several days have
> provided ample evidence that the pace of job destruction is
> accelerating.
>
> • The German-owned parcel delivery company DHL Express announced
> Monday that it is ceasing domestic shipping operations in the US,
> wiping out 9,500 jobs and threatening to turn Wilmington, Ohio, where
> 7,000 of those jobs are located, into a ghost town.
>
> • On the same day the electronics retailer Circuit City filed for
> bankruptcy, laying off another 700 workers on top of the 7,000 layoffs
> it announced a week ago, together with the closure of 155 stores.
>
> • Financial analysts and industry executives told the Financial Times
> of London that soon-to-be-announced budget plans for the financial
> industry will entail another 70,000 layoffs in the US.
>
> • In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced last Thursday
> that the city will cut 3,000 jobs from its workforce. Similar actions
> are being taken by local and state governments and other public
> agencies throughout the country, as they face declining tax revenues
> and increasing difficulty obtaining credit.
>
> Among the sectors hardest hit by the deepening financial crisis is the
> auto industry, with the Big Three US carmakers—General Motors, Ford
> and Chrysler—all teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.
>
> GM Tuesday announced that it will place nearly 2,000 more autoworkers
> on indefinite layoff in the first quarter of 2009. This comes on top
> of another 3,900 workers who are facing indefinite layoff as of this
> Friday. Ford announced 2,600 job cuts last Friday.
>
> GM's announcement came as the company's stock price plunged by 15
> percent, hitting the lowest level since the middle of the Second World
> War. Following third-quarter losses totaling $4.2 billion, the
> country's biggest auto company reported that it is running dangerously
> low on cash needed to maintain operations, prompting fears that it
> could soon go bankrupt. According to some estimates, such a bankruptcy
> could result in the destruction of up 2.5 million jobs as the impact
> spreads from GM and its own 325,000 employees to its suppliers,
> dealerships and related sectors of the economy.
>
> In the face of this unfolding catastrophe, the political establishment
> has begun discussing an extension of the government bailout of the
> major US banks and Wall Street finance houses to the auto industry.
> Democratic President-Elect Barack Obama reportedly discussed such a
> proposal with President Bush at their White House meeting Monday, and
> Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday that the House will
> convene next week to vote on a proposal to provide the Big Three with
> aid from the Treasury Department's $700 billion financial rescue
> program.
>
> While Democratic politicians are pitching the proposed aid to the auto
> companies as a matter of spreading the bailout from "Wall Street to
> Main Street," the real aim on both streets is the same: Rescuing the
> private fortunes and property of capitalist investors and executives,
> while forcing the working class to foot the bill.
>
> The social interests being defended by this vast outlay of taxpayer
> funds were spelled out in a column written for the New York Times last
> week by two prominent Harvard University economists, David Scharfstein
> and Jeremy Stein. They warned that the bailout of the banks placed no
> restrictions on the payout of dividends to their wealthy shareholders—
> not to mention the absence of any other requirements on how the banks
> use the hundreds of billions of dollars in public funds they receive.
> If such dividends are paid out at current levels, fully $25 billion of
> the $125 billion in taxpayer money going to the country's nine biggest
> banks will be paid out in the form of dividends to these shareholders
> in the first year alone.
>
> The government's outlay to prop up insurance giant AIG was nearly
> doubled to $150 billion Monday. It was also revealed that the Federal
> Reserve's lending topped $2 trillion for the first time last week. In
> this ever-expanding bailout, seemingly unlimited funds have been made
> available to secure Wall Street's fortunes, while Washington has
> failed to make available any significant aid to the millions of
> unemployed or the millions more facing the loss of their home.
>
> There should be no illusions that a bailout of the Big Three would be
> any different. Its aim would be to restore profitability, and it would
> be conditioned on demands for a sweeping rationalization and
> downsizing of the auto industry, together with new attacks on wages
> and on health and pension benefits for both active workers and
> retirees.
>
> The answer to the jobs crisis created by the parasitism of Wall Street
> and the looming bankruptcy of the auto industry and other sectors of
> the economy lies not in the bailout of their owners, but rather in the
> struggle for socialist policies, including the nationalization of
> these giant corporations and their transformation into public
> utilities, subject to the democratic oversight and control of the
> working population.
>
> Instead of pouring billions more dollars into the private coffers of
> America's financial elite, the huge bonuses and compensation packages
> that the executives have awarded themselves while leading their
> companies into bankruptcy should be confiscated and utilized to
> improve conditions of life for those facing unemployment, the loss of
> their homes, the shutoff of their utilities and the loss of their life
> savings.
>
> Nationalization under workers' control would establish the foundations
> for reorganizing economic life in the interests of the majority and
> protecting working people from the return of conditions not seen since
> the Great Depression. It would create the framework within which
> production could be geared to the satisfaction of human needs, rather
> than the generation of profit and the accumulation of personal wealth
> by the financial aristocracy.
>
> It would allow the rehiring of the unemployed and the provision of
> jobs to young people by reducing the work week to 30 hours, with no
> reduction in pay.
>
> The incoming Obama administration will carry out no such measures. It
> will be committed to the defense of the corporate and banking
> interests which dominate both the Democratic and Republican parties
> and which financed the Obama campaign. It will impose whatever
> conditions are required to defend these interests at the expense of
> working people.
>
> The struggle for nationalization under workers' control can be
> advanced only through the mobilization of working people independently
> of the Democrats and the entire two-party system, through the building
> of a new mass political movement based on a socialist and
> internationalist program. This is the aim of the Socialist Equality
> Party.
>
> Bill Van Auken
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to