Who had more moola?

Peace,
Doc

On Nov 12, 5:34 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An admission of election reporting bias by the Washington Post drew a
> "no comment" from the White House today.
>
> The response came from White House spokeswoman Dana Perino to a
> question from Les Kinsolving, WND's correspondent at the White House.
>
> The Post's admission came in a column by Ombudsman Deborah Howell, who
> wrote that the newspaper's op-ed pages favored Democrat Sen. Barack
> Obama by endorsement and in print. But Obama "deserved tougher
> scrutiny than he got," Howell said, "especially of his undergraduate
> years, his start in Chicago and his relationship with Antoin 'Tony"
> Rezko, who was convicted this year of influence-peddling."
>
> Howell also wrote that the Post "did nothing" on Obama's admitted drug
> use as a teenager, nor did the newspaper give vice presidential-elect
> Sen. Joe Biden the scrutiny he deserved, instead going over GOP vice
> presidential candidate Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin "with a fine-tooth
> comb."
>
> One-sidedness like that was a "gaping hole" in the newspaper's
> coverage, Howell wrote.
>
> Howell noted the newspaper "ran for more laudatory opinion pieces on
> Obama, 32, than on Sen. John McCain, 13. There were far more negative
> pieces about McCain, 58, than there were about Obama, 32."
>
> She added, "One gaping hole in coverage involved Joe Biden, Obama's
> running mate. When Gov. Sarah Palin was nominated for vice president,
> reporters were booking the next flight to Alaska. Some readers thought
> The Post went over Palin with a fine-tooth comb and neglected Biden.
> They are right; it was a serious omission."
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to