does Rupert Murdock ring a bell with you sunshine ? On Nov 16, 12:08 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > kinda hard to get reception in that cave eh murky? here let me help > ya so you will know where to look > abc > nbc > cbs > msnbc > cnbc > cnn > > On Nov 16, 11:25 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > i wish i could get this liberal MSM at my house it would be great to > > hear the real news ! > > > On Nov 16, 10:37 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > mark, > > > > And NOW you want to whine about the entire so called liberal MSM. > > > Think you can focus on one thing long enough to get thru this ONE > > > thread? Jesus!! > > > > On Nov 16, 9:22 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > oh come on holly. anonymous sources are the food in the trough of the > > > > liberal msm. they always site anonymous sources when they are about > > > > to tell another one of their whoppers. and after what we witness > > > > during this last election, it is obvious that the liberal msm has an > > > > agenda, and that agenda has nothing to do with the unbiased truth. > > > > > On Nov 16, 9:58 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > mark, > > > > > > First you compalin about anonymous sources. > > > > > Then you complain that the authenticated source is not conservative > > > > > source. > > > > > Nothing makes you happy. > > > > > > On Nov 16, 7:42 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > e about to > > > > > > now we quote the nyt. now there is an unbias source for ya. NOT. > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 8:36 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Obama-Threats.html?_r=1... > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 7:47 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > more quotes from anonymous sources. those seem to be the only > > > > > > > > sorces > > > > > > > > the libs seem to have. easier to tweak things to fit the > > > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 4:53 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Obama Has More Threats Than Other > > > > > > > > > Presidents-Electhttp://www.truthout.org/111508B > > > > > > > > > The Associated Press: "Threats against a new president > > > > > > > > > historically > > > > > > > > > spike right after an election, but from Maine to Idaho law > > > > > > > > > enforcement > > > > > > > > > officials are seeing more against Barack Obama than ever > > > > > > > > > before. The > > > > > > > > > Secret Service would not comment or provide the number of > > > > > > > > > cases they > > > > > > > > > are investigating. But since the Nov. 4 election, law > > > > > > > > > enforcement > > > > > > > > > officials have seen more potentially threatening writings, > > > > > > > > > Internet > > > > > > > > > postings and other activity directed at Obama than has been > > > > > > > > > seen with > > > > > > > > > any past president-elect, said officials aware of the > > > > > > > > > situation who > > > > > > > > > spoke on condition of anonymity because the issue of a > > > > > > > > > president's > > > > > > > > > security is so sensitive."- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
