Child hunger in US rose by 50 percent in 2007
By Kate Randall
20 November 2008

Some 691,000 children went hungry in America in 2007, a rise of 50
percent over the previous year, while one in eight Americans overall
struggled to feed themselves. The figures are reported in a study on
food security conducted annually by the US Department of Agriculture
(USDA).

Of the 36.2 million people who struggled with hunger during the year,
almost a third of these adults and children faced a substantial
disruption to their food supply, meaning they went hungry at some
point. The number of these most hungry Americans has grown by more
than 40 percent since 2000, rising to 11.9 million individuals in
2007.

These statistics are all the more alarming since they do not reflect
the impact of the current economic crisis. James Weill, president of
the Food Research and Action Center, predicted the 2008 numbers would
show even more hunger.

"There's every reason to think the increases in the number of hungry
people will be very, very large," Weill said, "based on the increased
demand we're seeing this year at food stamp agencies, emergency
kitchens, Women, Infants and Children clinics, really across the
entire social service support structure."

The USDA study covered about 45,600 households, selected as
representative of the approximately 118 million households in the US.
Households were classified as being "food secure," having "low food
security" or having "very low food security," according to their
answers to a set of questions, including:

• In the last 12 months, were you ever hungry, but didn't eat, because
there wasn't enough money for food?

• Did you or other adults in your household ever not eat for a whole
day because there wasn't enough money for food?

Households with children up to 18 years of age were asked additional
questions, such as:

• In the last 12 months, did you ever cut the size of any of the
children's meals because there wasn't enough money for food?

• In the last 12 months, did any of the children ever skip a meal
because there wasn't enough money for food?

Children were identified as having "very low food security" if they
lived in households that answered "yes" to 25 percent or more of the
questions asked (calculated according to a formula designed by the
study).

Some 691,000 children met the criteria. At some point during the year,
these children went to school without breakfast, ate meals providing
inadequate calories and nutrients, or went to bed hungry. Their
families could not provide for them because they did not have the
financial resources to do so.

These statistics translate into real and lasting suffering for
society's youngest members. Research has shown that hunger and
malnourishment have a profound impact on the mental and physical
development of preschool and school-aged children. They are more
likely to exhibit higher levels of chronic illness, anxiety and
depression, and behavioural problems than well-fed children.

Uncertainty about the ability to provide adequate food is devastating
for parents and families, both physically and mentally. Of the 4.7
million families estimated to suffer from very low food security, 98
percent worried that their food would run out before they got money to
buy more. Some 94 percent reported that they could not afford to eat
balanced meals.

Close to a third of these households reported that on occasion an
adult did not eat for an entire day because there was not enough money
for food. In 45 percent of these households an adult had lost weight
because he or she could not afford enough food. Often parents went
without so that the children could eat, or the youngest children ate
at the expense of older siblings.

Conditions of hunger for these households were not adequately
counteracted by assistance from the three largest federal food and
nutrition programs—the Food Stamp Program, the National School Lunch
Program and the Special Supplemental Nutritional Program for Women,
Infants, and Children (WIC)—or by help from food pantries or soup
kitchens.

Not surprisingly, the study showed that poverty is the greatest
contributing factor to hunger. In 2007, the federal poverty line was
set at $21,027 for a family of four, an amount woefully inadequate to
provide for sufficient food and nutrition, let alone pay for housing,
utilities and other necessities. In households where income fell below
this line, food insecurity stood at 37.7 percent.

The rate of food insecurity was 22.2 percent for African-American
households and 20.1 percent for Hispanic households. Food insecurity
was also more prevalent in households headed by a single parent where
there were children—30.2 percent for those headed by women, 18 percent
for those headed by men.

Southern states saw the highest rates of food insecurity. Measured
over three years, from 2005 through 2007, the states reporting the
highest figures were Mississippi (17.4 percent), New Mexico (15
percent), Texas (14.8 percent), and Arkansas (14.4 percent).

Food insecurity is not restricted to inner-city or urban metropolitan
areas, but is prevalent in rural and less-populated areas as well. The
highest growth in food insecurity over the last nine years has been in
the states of Alaska and Iowa, both of which saw a 3.7 percent
increase in families who faced substantial food disruptions.

A majority of US households are concerned about the cost of food. A
study released last month by the Opinion Research Group, commissioned
by Minnesota-based Hormel Food Corp., showed that 84 percent of
Americans are worried about rising food prices and 58 percent have had
to make cuts in their food purchases as a result.

More than half of those surveyed have had to take steps to reduce food
costs, including using more generic or store brands, eating out less
often, buying less expensive cuts of meat and increasing their
purchases of cheap staples such as potatoes and rice.

Of those polled, 14 percent said they or an immediate family member
had received food from a food bank, soup kitchen, shelter or other
charitable organization in the past year due to a lack of money for
food.

Among those who had not, 21 percent said it is very or somewhat likely
that rising food costs, a job loss or other circumstance might force
them to seek help for food from a charitable organization in the
future. These conditions will inevitably worsen as the economic crisis
intensifies.

The growing hunger crisis should be seen within the context of the
massive use of taxpayer funds to bail out Wall Street bankers and
financiers. Hundreds of billions are being handed over to these
interests, while no serious measures are being contemplated to
confront a social crisis that will intensify rapidly over the coming
months as layoffs mount and the recession deepens

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to