Marks makes a valid point and by denying it's validity you lose any credibility in the discussion.
Let's try something crazy here Woody and actually have an honest discussion. I tend to believe that divided government was the original intent of the framers for so many obvious reasons not the least of which is that compromise and a consensus-driven government will produce the checks and balances the founders intended. Are you saying the paradoxical circumstance we now face of having the Democrats in charge of both elected branches will provide more balanced and effective governance than the split governments we have so recently endured? CW --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
