Is Sarah Palin Being Christened as De Facto Leader of the GOP?
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/109942/
Sarah Palin is a walking, talking psychobomb -- and she's on the
verge
of becoming the face of the Republican party.                  A
standup comic once joked about his inner monologue while
rubbernecking
through the scene of a car accident. First the serious reaction: "Oh!
How horrifying! How awful!" Then the morbidly gleeful: "Cool! Is that
an arm?"

Watching the Republican Party implosion and subsequent bloody
flailing
has become my favorite spectator sport. "Wow, the Republican Party is
really, really horribly mangled," then, "Cool! Palin's making an ass
of herself on TV again!"


Why the excitement? Well, it appears as if she's being christened as
the de facto leader of the Republican Party. Wednesday, for example,
instead of attributing his victory to the well-known Republican
majority in Georgia, Saxby Chambliss credited his expected victory to
Sarah Palin's stump speeches:


"...when she walks in a room, folks just explode."
Explode? Smart choice of words, Senator. Sarah Palin makes
Republicans
explode. Perfect.


If Palin, in fact, becomes the leader of the Republican Party,
exploding is precisely what will happen -- and not in the weirdly
excited-slash-sexual way Chambliss seemed to imply. Specifically,
Sarah Palin is a walking, talking psychobomb, and elevating her to
anything beyond a near-term novelty will be disastrous -- in a word,
"explosive" -- for the Republican Party.


And it'll be almost too much fun to watch.


As of right now, we have several contenders for this post. There's
"Sister Sarah" (a nickname I don't quite understand). There's the
twice divorced former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. There's Bobby
Jindal, the far-right governor of Louisiana. And Tuesday, we learned
that Jeb Bush might be running for Senate and thus throwing his
gigantic hat into the fight for the future of the party.


How screwed are the Republicans right now? Put it this way: the
sanest
contender in the above list is named "Bush." Yes, Bush: a name that
proved to be even less popular this year than the name "Hussein." Yet
there he is front and center.


Now, it's important to clarify the schadenfreude and why the
aforementioned Republican contenders are so much fun, and, more
importantly, why many fellow liberals are rooting for them to keep
talking.


Simply put, Palin and the others, will serve to more or less confine
the Republican Party to the deep South where there are enough white
fundamentalist hoopleheads to provide the GOP with a respectable
electoral showing, but not enough support to seriously compete
nationally. In other words, the Republicans are inexplicably pushing
names that will do much more harm than good. And that's just fine and
dandy.


For instance, apart from her unserious pageant walking and clueless
turkey geeking, it's practically impossible for Sarah Palin, with her
far-right ideology and divisive politics, to expand a Republican
electorate that's already suffering from, well, shrinkage. Her appeal
is so laser-focused on a rabidly fanboy-ish chunk of the GOP base
that
many more Americans who would otherwise vote Republican will surely
continue to snap to other options. Meanwhile, the Palin base -- the
fanboys who are "exploding" over Sarah Palin -- are a mélange of Bush
dead-enders, disgruntled former Bush loyalists who haven't yet
realized that the only difference between Palin and Bush is, well,
lipstick, and, of course, way too many disturbingly pervy older men.
Outside of this narrow demographic, everyone else thinks she's more
or
less an earnest yet embarrassing joke.


Anecdotally speaking, while working the polls on Election Day, I
overheard more than one relatively uninformed, uneducated Republican
-- I mean, guys who probably think "peeance freeance" is an actual
foreign policy term -- turn to their buddy and say (paraphrasing),
"Palin's kind of an idiot. And she probably don't know what peeance
freeance means neither."


The only possibilities for the resuscitation of the Republican Party
are either, 1) a failed Obama presidency or, 2) an as-of-yet
unannounced transformative and inspirational Republican figure.


There's nothing to really indicate the former, but there's always the
freak possibility that a random cascade of uncontrollable events
could
swing the White House into turmoil. It happened to President Carter.


As for the latter, I really can't think of a Republican answer to
Barack Obama. Once again, however, the Republicans are betting on
either Sarah Palin or Bobby Jindal to be the knock-off Bizarro Obama.
Palin aside, the notion that Jindal is the "Republican Obama"
amplifies how truly ridiculous and desperate the Republicans are.


They're making a huge mistake in assuming that just because Jindal is
young and of unusual ethnic origins that he's the equivalent of
Barack
Obama -- in the same way they mistakenly calculated that Sarah Palin
would attract female voters just because she's a woman, even though
she possessed none of the positive qualities of Senator Clinton. It's
totally shallow and vaguely racist. A party which has so often dealt
in identity politics and racial divisiveness to suddenly go, "Hey,
look over here! We have an ethnic, too!" seems weird and awful to me.


Additionally, Jindal's religious extremism won't manufacture any new
Republican voters from the middle -- he's anti-choice without
exceptions, he supports teaching creationism as a science in public
schools and, yes, he once performed an exorcism on a friend who he
believed was possessed by a demon. Yeah, if there's one thing the
Republican Party needs more of, it's religious zealotry.


So we have an exorcist, a Bush, a turkey geeker who makes people
explode, and Newt, who, by the way, wrote a book imagining if the
South had won the Civil War. If these cable reality show misfits
represent the future of the Republican Party, it's going to be a
seriously entertaining four years.


BobCesca.com



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to