Two current reviews in the NYTimes book section: "The Ascent of Money"
by Naill Ferguson and "Unintended Consequences- How War in Iraq
Strengthened America's Enemies" by Peter W. Galbraith.// I see a
gloomy future contrasted by the razzle-dazzle of the holiday season.
American psychosis. It may make for more honest Lent.
On Dec 5, 9:21 pm, "M.A. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Wizards of WashingtonbySheldon Richman,December 5, 2008Remember that 
> scene in The Wizard of Oz when Toto reveals the “great and powerful wizard” 
> as nothing but a homunculus operating an imposing thunder-and-lightning 
> machine? “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain,” he bellows, not 
> knowing enough to quit even when he’s exposed.
> The government’s response to the current economic turmoil reminds me of that 
> scene. We are assured by the awe-inspiring U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve 
> that if we trust them with essential control of the American economy, all 
> will be set right.
> Behind the curtain, however, are just a bunch of bureaucrats who couldn’t 
> possibly put the economy right because no one can know how to do that. They 
> would be better able to give a cowardly lion courage, a tin man a heart, or a 
> scarecrow a brain.
> Sloppy metaphors to the contrary, an economy is not an engine that 
> occasionally needs a mechanic to go under the hood to tune it up. An economy 
> is people pursuing their preferences by engaging in endless varieties of 
> exchanges with others while coordinating disparate plans founded on unspoken 
> expectations. It’s an amazingly orderly process when it is allowed to operate 
> in peace and without government intervention.
> Unfortunately, governments rarely let it operate in peace. Government 
> planning is power, and with only a few exceptions, most people attracted to 
> top government jobs want to wield power. While they are incapable of fixing 
> an economy if that means restoring it to its consumer-serving function they 
> are capable of skewing it to their own purposes.
> Government interference with the economic process represents a substitution 
> of political for consumer objectives. In a freely functioning economy absent 
> government privileges and burdens entrepreneurs work to arrange the 
> productive process ultimately to satisfy consumers’ subjective preferences. 
> This idea is implicit in the very conceptsproduction, investment, and 
> labor.Their fruits must have value in the eyes of consumers or they are not 
> productive.
> Thus when government “creates jobs” or saves companies by taking money from 
> the private sector, it is not truly productive activity. Rather, the 
> government has preempted the economic process, forbidding it to serve 
> consumers so that it can instead serve the objectives of politicians and 
> bureaucrats.
> President-elect Obama’s chief of staff-designate, Rahm Emanuel, says, “You 
> never want a serious crisis to go to waste. Things that we had postponed for 
> too long, that were long-term, are now immediate and must be dealt with. This 
> crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do 
> before.” Emanuel here unwittingly affirms Robert Higgs’s thesis in Crisis and 
> Leviathan: government will use a crisis (real, exaggerated, or imagined) to 
> expand its power. And Emanuel clearly grasps Higgs’s corollary: when the 
> crisis subsides, the new powers will not be shed. Some will remain in force; 
> others will be put on the shelf to await the next crisis.
> The current financial turmoil is a textbook illustration of Higgs’s 
> principle. In just the last few months the Fed and Treasury have engaged in 
> activities they had not dared engage in before, such as bailing out 
> investment banks and insurance companies and buying shares in banks. The 
> precedent has been set. Next time, such activity will be even easier.
> None of this will fix the economy. The federal government as of late November 
> had committed more than $7 trillion to the financial system in loan purchases 
> and guarantees of various sorts. But Treasury borrowing only moves money from 
> point A to point B, while Fed policy creates money out of thin air. Every 
> dollar the Treasury borrows is a dollar the private sector can’t invest in 
> consumer-oriented projects, and every dollar the Fed creates distorts the 
> economy by transferring purchasing power from the people to privileged 
> interests. The resulting economy is built on false signals and expectations 
> which can’t be sustained without government support. That is hardly the route 
> to sustainable economic growth.
> When you recall that today’s economic turmoil is the direct result of earlier 
> distortions from government policies guarantees to lenders, so-called 
> affordable-housing policies, et cetera it is clear that ground is being 
> seeded for the next crisis.
> At our peril do we pay no attention to those men behind the 
> curtain.http://www.fff.org/comment/com0812c.asp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to