No problem!  We just privatize it---as Milton Friedman-based
economists in government have been trying to do.  The Bush
Administration followers of the Chicago School economic cult tried
unsuccessfully to privatize social security, the postal system and
Medicare.  Their idea of an ideal state is one in which the road
system, for example, is all private corporate built and owned . . .
and paid for by multiple toll booths.  Already, they have privatized
prisons which can be made cost-efficient by mistreating prisoners.

In-government followers of the cult---Ronald  Rumsfeld and General
Brennon specifically---succeeded in mostly privatized the U.S. Army.
There are almost as many mercenary troops hired to guard as there are
government troops in combat in Iraq.  Construction projects done in
the past by the Army are now hired out at high cost.  All this makes
wars in which masses of people lose their life temptingly profitable---
and hence desirable---to business.

So, why stop there?  Why not go all the way and even privatize the
Federal Park system?  It could pay for itself by increasing entrance
fees and logging permits.  We can even hire private firms to monitor
and regulate other privatized government services.  To see that there
is no collusion between over-sighter and the over-sightee, we could
hire still others such companies to monitor, regulate and audit them.
Enron-like companies would fight for a contract to do that!

If this does not seem like an improvement, much less an ideal, it is
nevertheless what it has done with Iraq.  The intent was to set up a
bustling, modern state by taking government assets, and turning them
over to corporations.  For example, the Western world's oil companies
now have Iraq's oil reserves and facilities through a complicated
series of America-imposed legal regulations and contractual
arrangements (N. Klein, The Shock Doctrine, Holt & Co, 2007)

Do we want this for ourselves?  Did we the people know about all this
and authorize it?  Or did our corporate state do it on its own?

It might not be the best way to bring “democracy” to the world.


Charles
http://atheistic-science.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to