The Democratic Party did... The issue is NOT about little Mike... On Dec 9, 5:25 pm, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > where did i attempt to defend any one ? jgg you are one of the most > partisan posters i have ever seen > > On Dec 9, 2:04 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Standard stock reply by a blinded Democratic partisan... Rep > > Livingston was cuxified by the Democrats for having an out of wedlock > > child and being willing to pay child support for over a decade... > > Jefferson frig had the bribe money the FBI gave him... And you seek > > to defend the stained honor of corrupt Democrats... figures.. > > > On Dec 9, 12:29 pm, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > you mean rangel who brought the allegations about himself to the > > > ethics board so they could rule on them ? > > > to this date Jefferson has not even been charged with a crime . in the > > > interest of openness in the house the democrats removed him from his > > > position until the mater could be cleared up . > > > On Dec 9, 12:24 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Mike, was Jefferson supported in his re-election bid by the Democratic > > > > Party??? The answer is yes... And now you have the question of > > > > Rangel... Power corrupts even Democrats... > > > > > On Dec 9, 11:39 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > i seem to remember Jefferson was removed from his position on the > > > > > committee he chaired . and the matter was referred to the ethics > > > > > committee for further action . > > > > > so once again jgg it seems to be that you are talking through your > > > > > hat ! > > > > > On Dec 9, 11:15 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > The real question here is why did the top Democratic leader support > > > > > > Jefferson after it was plain the extent of his corruption... The > > > > > > point here is that they WILLINGLY accept and tolerate corruption if > > > > > > it > > > > > > is a Democrat... This is not reform we can believe in... > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 4:01 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Jefferson lost because the democrats didn't vote . even the winner > > > > > > > admitted that they only won because of low voter turn out ! > > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 11:37 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > lost his re-election bid... In a heavily Democratic, AA > > > > > > > > majority > > > > > > > > district, a Republican won... This of course will be ignored > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > those thinking there is a new Democratic mandidate from the > > > > > > > > American > > > > > > > > People,,, Unless the Democrats can clean up their own > > > > > > > > corruption, > > > > > > > > as Rangel and Dodd, it may be their domination will last only 2 > > > > > > > > years... > > > > > > > > > The issue the American People care about is Corruption not who > > > > > > > > did the > > > > > > > > corruption... > > > > > > > > >http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jhyxqwT9LfU2KxIMO9A... > > > > > > > > > >>> Cao won a predominantly black and heavily Democratic > > > > > > > > >>> district that covers most of New Orleans. He will become > > > > > > > > >>> the first Vietnamese-American in Congress.- Hide quoted > > > > > > > > >>> text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
