There are some actions that should cause banning. But they are few on a well moderated board. Posting porn...a no no. Threatening another poster...a no no. So tho I agree with you on principle...I do think some people deserve banning. Luckily there aren't that many.
On Dec 10, 12:44 pm, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. I don't want to get into the whole mess, but would like to > note (as with a person having too many (attractive) friends) that a > board can never have enough unique posters. I vote to drop the whole > concept of banning altogether. > > On Dec 10, 1:38 pm, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't know. He thought it was WNCS, but she has said it was not > > her. And WNCS doesn't lie. So good question. > > > On Dec 10, 12:32 pm, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anybody gonna step up? > > > > On Dec 10, 12:23 pm, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Simple question, can I get a simple answer?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
