>>>  request to keep improperly rejected ballots out of the U.S. Senate recount

By whose standards???   Clearly this is not a factual news article by
a fake "news report" that is really an opinion piece...

On Dec 19, 2:42 pm, Florida Cracker 532 <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Minnesota Supreme Court Weighs Absentee Ballots
>  http://www.truthout.org/121808S
> At a sometimes testy hearing, the state Supreme Court heard the
> Coleman campaign's request to keep improperly rejected ballots out of
> the U.S. Senate recount.
>
>     Minnesota's disputed U.S. Senate race went before the state
> Supreme Court on Wednesday, as Sen. Norm Coleman's campaign sought to
> keep improperly rejected absentee ballots from becoming part of the
> official recount.
>
>     After a 70-minute hearing, both Republican Coleman and Democratic
> challenger Al Franken awaited a ruling by the state high court that
> could uncomplicate one of the largest remaining issues in the race -
> whether as many as 1,600 absentee ballots that may have been
> improperly rejected should be part of the recount now being completed
> by the five-member state Canvassing Board. With the candidates
> separated by such a narrow margin, the absentee ballots could be a
> deciding factor.
>
>     At Wednesday's hearing, lawyers for both campaigns were peppered
> with questions from the court, which was presided over by Justice
> Alan
> Page. Both Chief Justice Eric Magnuson and Justice G. Barry Anderson
> recused themselves from the proceedings because they were again busy
> Wednesday sorting through challenged ballots - another critical issue
> in the recount - as members of the Canvassing Board.
>
>     The hearing in a packed room began with Justice Paul Anderson
> testily responding to Roger Magnuson, the lead attorney for Coleman,
> who compared Minnesota's recount to the 2000 presidential election
> dispute that focused on the counting of ballots in Florida. "This is
> not Florida," said Anderson.
>
>     Coleman's campaign does not want the Canvassing Board to count
> any
> improperly rejected absentee ballots, saying it is not the proper
> body
> to settle that issue. Instead, it wants those ballots set aside and
> preserved in the event either campaign goes to court after the
> recount
> to try to get a judge to include them in the tally. The Franken
> campaign wants the recount before the Canvassing Board to include the
> ballots.
>
>     Magnuson argued that the Canvassing Board, which cannot legally
> order county and city election officials to count the ballots,
> confused matters last week when it recommended that local officials
> sort and count them. With some counties following the recommendation,
> and others not, the counts "will be inconsistent," said Magnuson, who
> served as legal counsel for the Florida Senate and Legislature in the
> 2000 case arising out of the presidential election.
>
>     Bill Pentelovitch, the lead attorney for Franken before the
> court,
> was at times also confronted by the five justices. Page said he did
> not understand why the disputed absentee ballots could not be counted
> afterward should a court challenge be mounted. "What's the
> difference?" he asked.
>
>     Pentelovitch replied that once the Canvassing Board finishes the
> recount and issues a certificate of election to the winner in the
> race, "the presumption [is] the person who has the certificate is the
> winner."
>
>     Justice Paul Anderson, who appeared to reserve his most pointed
> questions for the Coleman campaign, said he worried about the rights
> of an absentee voter who cast a ballot that was improperly rejected.
> "Why should a voter who does cast a ballot that's valid have to bring
> a [legal] contest [to get it counted]?" he asked. "That just doesn't
> seem right."
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to