Republicand and conservatives do and will accept a defeat grqciously unlike
the whiney, crying libtards who would moan, groan and piss around forever if
they lose.

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:56 AM, mike [never forget] 532 <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Potential Franken Victory Sends GOP into Paranoid Fits
> http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/115385/
> When Republicans lawyer up, that's just preserving the sanctity of the
> vote; when Dems do it, they're 'stealing' ... something. The possible,
> perhaps, impending victory of Al Franken to the Senate has sent GOP
> officials into a paranoid tizzy.
>
> In an "urgent message" to supporters, the Republican National Lawyer
> Association accuses Franken and his "liberal allies" of "working
> feverishingly [sic] to steal the Minnesota Senate election."
>
> "As you may know, the precinct recount phase of the Minnesota Senate
> race was won by Sen. Norm Coleman on Election Day," reads the
> petition, signed by the group's executive director, Michael Thielen.
> "But Al Franken still won't concede. Instead, Franken raised millions
> of dollars from liberals in New York and Hollywood to fight a "legal"
> battle to undo the will of the voters. He even got the Minnesota
> Supreme Court to order canvassing boards to consider about 1600
> previously rejected and questionable ballots. Now, Republican Norm
> Coleman has until December 31st to fight against Franken's liberal
> legal team to keep his Senate seat. RNLA and Norm Coleman are fighting
> for every vote -- literally!"
>
> From there, the RNLA asks readers to donate money so that it can
> uphold the sanctity of the Minnesota election and prevent Franken from
> "stealing" the Senate seat.
>
> For those following the recount closely, the letter is filled with a
> variety of obvious misinterpretations and inaccuracies. For instance,
> the RNLA gives the impression that during the canvassing process,
> officials "found errors favoring Franken so incredibly statistically
> improbable that statisticians are questioning the officials in these
> counties." It's not clear which statisticians the RNLA is referring
> to. But a study done by a Dartmouth professor actually predicted the
> very gains made by Franken.
>
>
>
> RNLA then says that "during the recount an Election Official explained
> an error that resulted in Franken losing votes occurred when her
> precinct double-counted some votes on election night. But after
> pressure from Democrats made the official change her story the
> [Secretary of State] Mark Ritchie led Canvassing Board decided for
> that precinct only the recount did not count and would instead use the
> more favorable to Franken Election Day total."
>
> In all likelihood the instance they are referring to involved the loss
> of a very specific envelope of ballots in a highly Democratic
> district. At first officials assumed they had simply counted those
> ballots twice on Election Day and could not match that vote total
> during the recount. Later, however, it became clear that ballots had
> been misplaced. And when they couldn't be relocated the state decided,
> as is permitted by law, to simply use the Election Day results and
> forgo the recount of that district.
>
> The funniest bit, however, comes at the end of RNLA letter, in which
> the group makes a plea to help Coleman match the money Franken has
> raised for their "legal battle."
>
> "Since election day when it was clear Norm Coleman had won, Al Franken
> raised millions of dollars to continue his legal battle. We need to do
> the same for Norm Coleman."
> The Minnesota Republican, of course, is mired in an ethics scandal
> that could threaten his Senate seat should he win reelection. Franken
> is just lawyering up for the recount.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>


-- 
*~@):~{>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to