Which is why I have developed a crush on Rush! LOL

On Dec 27, 6:12�am, "mike [never forget] 532"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> which is another reason we need the fairness doctrine
>
> On Dec 27, 7:10�am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The Obama team needs to keep his myth alive so the press will not do
> > its duty. The free press is our guarantee of an honest government.
> > Unfortunately, most of the press has turned into quasi-celebrities who
> > concentrate on their own popularity/ego.
>
> > On Dec 27, 5:49 am, "mike [never forget] 532"
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > i am not sure what you are implying .
>
> > > On Dec 27, 6:18 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Consider the amount of time it took the Obama transition team to get
> > > > its act/lies together in the Blago affair, mike.
>
> > > > On Dec 27, 4:46 am, "mike [never forget] 532"
>
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > six years of open and honest government sounds pretty good to me .
>
> > > > > On Dec 27, 5:35 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Agreed. It's a better joke than Franken could have dreamed up. A six
> > > > > > year joke ahead.
>
> > > > > > On Dec 26, 9:43 pm, kosmic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > The running joke in mn is that the recount is not over until 
> > > > > > > Franken
> > > > > > > wins. And it's starting to look like he will win. What a joke on 
> > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > right to vote.
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 26, 7:27 am, "mike [never forget] 532"
>
> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > oh you mean like when the family had the supreme court block 
> > > > > > > > the vote
> > > > > > > > count in Florida and appointed G W president ?
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 8:24 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Republicand and conservatives do and will accept a defeat 
> > > > > > > > > grqciously unlike
> > > > > > > > > the whiney, crying libtards who would moan, groan and piss 
> > > > > > > > > around forever if
> > > > > > > > > they lose.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:56 AM, mike [never forget] 532 <
>
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Potential Franken Victory Sends GOP into Paranoid Fits
> > > > > > > > > >http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/115385/
> > > > > > > > > > When Republicans lawyer up, that's just preserving the 
> > > > > > > > > > sanctity of the
> > > > > > > > > > vote; when Dems do it, they're 'stealing' ... something. 
> > > > > > > > > > The possible,
> > > > > > > > > > perhaps, impending victory of Al Franken to the Senate has 
> > > > > > > > > > sent GOP
> > > > > > > > > > officials into a paranoid tizzy.
>
> > > > > > > > > > In an "urgent message" to supporters, the Republican 
> > > > > > > > > > National Lawyer
> > > > > > > > > > Association accuses Franken and his "liberal allies" of 
> > > > > > > > > > "working
> > > > > > > > > > feverishingly [sic] to steal the Minnesota Senate election."
>
> > > > > > > > > > "As you may know, the precinct recount phase of the 
> > > > > > > > > > Minnesota Senate
> > > > > > > > > > race was won by Sen. Norm Coleman on Election Day," reads 
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > petition, signed by the group's executive director, Michael 
> > > > > > > > > > Thielen.
> > > > > > > > > > "But Al Franken still won't concede. Instead, Franken 
> > > > > > > > > > raised millions
> > > > > > > > > > of dollars from liberals in New York and Hollywood to fight 
> > > > > > > > > > a "legal"
> > > > > > > > > > battle to undo the will of the voters. He even got the 
> > > > > > > > > > Minnesota
> > > > > > > > > > Supreme Court to order canvassing boards to consider about 
> > > > > > > > > > 1600
> > > > > > > > > > previously rejected and questionable ballots. Now, 
> > > > > > > > > > Republican Norm
> > > > > > > > > > Coleman has until December 31st to fight against Franken's 
> > > > > > > > > > liberal
> > > > > > > > > > legal team to keep his Senate seat. RNLA and Norm Coleman 
> > > > > > > > > > are fighting
> > > > > > > > > > for every vote -- literally!"
>
> > > > > > > > > > From there, the RNLA asks readers to donate money so that 
> > > > > > > > > > it can
> > > > > > > > > > uphold the sanctity of the Minnesota election and prevent 
> > > > > > > > > > Franken from
> > > > > > > > > > "stealing" the Senate seat.
>
> > > > > > > > > > For those following the recount closely, the letter is 
> > > > > > > > > > filled with a
> > > > > > > > > > variety of obvious misinterpretations and inaccuracies. For 
> > > > > > > > > > instance,
> > > > > > > > > > the RNLA gives the impression that during the canvassing 
> > > > > > > > > > process,
> > > > > > > > > > officials "found errors favoring Franken so incredibly 
> > > > > > > > > > statistically
> > > > > > > > > > improbable that statisticians are questioning the officials 
> > > > > > > > > > in these
> > > > > > > > > > counties." It's not clear which statisticians the RNLA is 
> > > > > > > > > > referring
> > > > > > > > > > to. But a study done by a Dartmouth professor actually 
> > > > > > > > > > predicted the
> > > > > > > > > > very gains made by Franken.
>
> > > > > > > > > > RNLA then says that "during the recount an Election 
> > > > > > > > > > Official explained
> > > > > > > > > > an error that resulted in Franken losing votes occurred 
> > > > > > > > > > when her
> > > > > > > > > > precinct double-counted some votes on election night. But 
> > > > > > > > > > after
> > > > > > > > > > pressure from Democrats made the official change her story 
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > [Secretary of State] Mark Ritchie led Canvassing Board 
> > > > > > > > > > decided for
> > > > > > > > > > that precinct only the recount did not count and would 
> > > > > > > > > > instead use the
> > > > > > > > > > more favorable to Franken Election Day total."
>
> > > > > > > > > > In all likelihood the instance they are referring to 
> > > > > > > > > > involved the loss
> > > > > > > > > > of a very specific envelope of ballots in a highly 
> > > > > > > > > > Democratic
> > > > > > > > > > district. At first officials assumed they had simply 
> > > > > > > > > > counted those
> > > > > > > > > > ballots twice on Election Day and could not match that vote 
> > > > > > > > > > total
> > > > > > > > > > during the recount. Later, however, it became clear that 
> > > > > > > > > > ballots had
> > > > > > > > > > been misplaced. And when they couldn't be relocated the 
> > > > > > > > > > state decided,
> > > > > > > > > > as is permitted by law, to simply use the Election Day 
> > > > > > > > > > results and
> > > > > > > > > > forgo the recount of that district.
>
> > > > > > > > > > The funniest bit, however, comes at the end of RNLA letter, 
> > > > > > > > > > in which
> > > > > > > > > > the group makes a plea to help Coleman match the money 
> > > > > > > > > > Franken has
> > > > > > > > > > raised for their "legal battle."
>
> > > > > > > > > > "Since election day when it was clear Norm Coleman had won, 
> > > > > > > > > > Al Franken
> > > > > > > > > > raised millions of dollars to continue his legal battle. We 
> > > > > > > > > > need to do
> > > > > > > > > > the same for Norm Coleman."
> > > > > > > > > > The Minnesota Republican, of course, is mired in an ethics 
> > > > > > > > > > scandal
> > > > > > > > > > that could threaten his Senate seat should he win 
> > > > > > > > > > reelection. Franken
> > > > > > > > > > is just lawyering up for the recount.
>
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to