We can only hope that the court will do the right thing and declare him ineigible.
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Ohio mark <[email protected]>wrote: > > A second conference has been posted on the docket for the U.S. Supreme > Court over the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the White > House, this one scheduled a week after Congress is to review the > Electoral College vote tabulation. > > The latest issue posted is a request for an injunction on the election > results pending the resolution of a petition for a writ of certiorari > filed by attorney Philip J. Berg, a case that is docketed for a > similar conference among the justices on Jan. 9. > > Berg's original case raises questions about Obama's eligibility and > his injunction request first was filed early in December. It was > submitted to and rejected by two different justices before it came > before Justice Antonin Scalia on Dec. 18. Then just before Christmas > the docket was updated to reflect that the motion had been > "distributed for conference of January 16, 2009." > > On Berg's Obama Crimes.com website, he said Congress is scheduled to > hear the Electoral College results on Jan. 8. Then on Jan. 9 there's > the conference scheduled on Berg's case itself, with the injunction > issue to be addressed a week later. > > WND has reported Berg's case, one of the first legal challenges to > Obama's eligibility to reach the Supreme Court, alleges he cannot > constitutionally be inaugurated. > > "I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified natural > born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of president of > the United States," Berg said in a statement on his ObamaCrimes.com > website. > > "Obama knows he is not 'natural born' as he knows where he was born > and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; Obama is an attorney, > Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; Obama knows his > candidacy is the largest 'hoax' attempted on the citizens of the > United States in over 200 years; Obama places our Constitution in a > 'crisis' situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be > blackmailed by leaders around the world who know Obama is not > qualified," Berg's statement continued. > > "The Supreme Court has listed the case of Berg vs. Obama for > 'conference' on January 9," the website said. > > "I am appalled that the main stream media continues to ignore this > issue as we are headed to a 'Constitution Crisis,'" Berg wrote. "There > is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be > enforced. I am concerned that our courts have not yet decided to look > into the merits of our allegations." > > http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=84609 > > > -- *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
