I disagree. For example, I continue to see more of Sarah Palin than I
care to on all the networks. She's a Republican, right? Why is she
still even in the news?

On Jan 9, 9:18�pm, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am saying that you need to get some perspective. �and obviously you
> do not watch fox, because unlike the aforementioned liberal lap dogs,
> fox does present just as many dems as republicans, which you cannot
> say about the liberal msm.
>
> On Jan 9, 9:05 pm, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > So it's ok if one network does it but not several? Either you are
> > morally and ethically opposed to such a practice or you aren't.
> > Disapproving of it only for the other team makes it look like sour
> > grapes.
>
> > On Jan 9, 8:48 pm, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > one network, big whoop. now let's see, nbc, cbs, abc, cnn, msnbc,
> > > pbs, nyt, la times, chicago tribune, etc, etc, etc and on and on all
> > > follow barry around like dogs in heat. let us get a little
> > > perspective here, k?
>
> > > On Jan 9, 8:43 pm, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > You're exactly right... the press should never become cheerleaders for
> > > > an administration, like Fox did for Bush. Funny I didn't hear you
> > > > whining then.
>
> > > > On Jan 9, 8:38 pm, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > yes dear, but the press is never to be cheerleaders. they were given
> > > > > the job of keeping an eye on things for the people. the press has
> > > > > lost their credibility now that they have become just another arm of
> > > > > barrys administration. they are a joke.
>
> > > > > On Jan 9, 8:03 pm, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Looks like your hero feels the same way:
>
> > > > > > Bush said. "And one message that I have and I think we all share is
> > > > > > that we want you to succeed."
>
> > > > > >http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/01/bush_to_obama...
>
> > > > > > On Jan 9, 6:23 pm, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Chris Matthews won't be working alone. Back in November, the 
> > > > > > > Hardball
> > > > > > > host said it was his job to make Barack Obama's presidency a 
> > > > > > > success.
> > > > > > > Today, another TV journalist expressed a similar sentiment. Tavis
> > > > > > > Smiley has declared that "we're all working for Barack Obama" and 
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > "we have to help make Obama a great president." [H/t reader 
> > > > > > > dronetek.]
>
> > > > > > > The host of Tavis Smiley on PBS was a guest on Morning Joe. 
> > > > > > > Reacting
> > > > > > > to Harry Reid's claim last week that he doesn't work for Barack 
> > > > > > > Obama,
> > > > > > > Smiley said Reid should "put down the crack pipe." Smiley added
> > > > > > > "we're all working for Barack Obama." It soon became clear that 
> > > > > > > was no
> > > > > > > passing quip, but a literal description of how he sees his role.
>
> > > > > > >http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2009/01/09/tavis-smiley...-
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to