it works every where lew more equals better education .

On Jan 15, 1:55 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why does't that work in Chicago and Washington.
>
> It is a dismal failure there.
>
> More money = dismal performance.
>
> On Jan 15, 9:05 am, "liberal mike532  !" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Maryland: As State Increased School Aid, Grades Went 
> > Uphttp://www.truthout.org/011409ED
> > Liz Bowie, The Baltimore Sun: "Five years after Maryland increased
> > spending by $2 billion to provide greater academic equity, students
> > have made remarkable gains in reading and math, according to a report
> > given to the Maryland General Assembly yesterday by an outside
> > consultant."
> > For every additional $1,000 spent per student, there was a
> > significant increase in pass rates in both subjects. The improvement
> > was twice as great for middle school students as for those in
> > elementary grades.
>
> > The report by MGT of America also confirms what most educators
> > have intuitively believed for decades: Money invested in teachers
> > appears to pay off. About 80 percent of additional local and state
> > funding has been spent on the teaching staff - raising salaries,
> > hiring more to reduce class sizes and requiring a highly qualified
> > teacher in every classroom.
>
> > "I think it is a validation of a leap of faith that the
> > legislature and the governor took to continue to fund it," said state
> > Superintendent Nancy S. Grasmick, referring to The Bridge to
> > Excellence Act. Passed in 2002, that law put into effect the
> > recommendations of a state education funding commission chaired by
> > Alvin Thornton.
>
> > Grasmick said the report points out the wisdom of the
> > legislature's decision to pass the law, which required not just an 80
> > percent increase in the level of funding but targeted the money to
> > provide the most help to special education and poor students and
> > those
> > learning English. Students in those categories did not make as much
> > progress in learning math and reading as did the general population.
> > The achievement gaps are still a matter of concern, she said.
>
> > The legislature mandated that school systems not reduce the
> > amount
> > of money they provided schools from county budgets while the state
> > dollars increased. Local appropriations per pupil did not drop during
> > the five-year period, but there is still little equality among the
> > school systems in how much is spent per pupil. Montgomery County
> > allots more per pupil than any other system, for example, and rural
> > Caroline County contributes least.
>
> > There will never be equality in school funding, said Jerry
> > Ciesla,
> > a senior partner at MGT, because each local government will
> > contribute
> > more or less to its school system on top of what the state gives.
> > But,
> > he said, there is more equity since the Thornton law was passed.
> > There
> > is "fairness of state funding," he said. "Those who need it the most
> > get the most."
>
> > State dollars account for, on average, about 44 percent of the
> > school system budgets across the state.
>
> > The report's release came the same day Education Week ranked
> > Maryland schools No. 1 in the nation, giving yesterday's press
> > conference in Annapolis with Grasmick and Gov. Martin O'Malley a
> > congratulatory air. Just one year after the governor said he wanted
> > to
> > get rid of the education secretary, the two appeared happy to share
> > the announcement.
>
> > "They really deserve the No. 1 ranking," said Ciesla, whose
> > company is doing 66 education studies in many states around the
> > country. Educators in other states, Ciesla said, hold Maryland's
> > schools in high regard. The combination of this positive report and
> > the ranking will likely bring more attention to the state, he said.
> > "I
> > think Maryland is going to be bombarded by all the other
> > states. . . .
> > How did you do this?"
>
> > In the spring of 2002, Maryland became the first state in the
> > nation to adopt a major reform of its school finance system to
> > provide
> > greater equity for all students without the pressure of a court
> > order.
> > The state, in part through an increase in the tax on cigarettes,
> > began
> > gradually increasing the amount of money given to local school
> > systems
> > for pre-kindergarten through 12th grade.
>
> > By the 2007-2008 school year, the state was spending $2.03
> > billion
> > more or $2,438 per pupil on education. As part of the revamping, the
> > General Assembly required a final report to detail how the money had
> > been spent and whether it had made a difference. State education
> > spending would continue at the current level, unless the legislature
> > took action to change it. The report recommends that another study of
> > the adequacy of state funding be conducted in 2012.
>
> > Part of the MGT analysis included a survey of 16,000 teachers in
> > the state about their practices and their schools. The survey was an
> > attempt to find out what practices worked best so that the
> > information
> > could be used to improve struggling schools. At high-performing
> > schools, teachers collaborated on lesson plans, analyzed test data
> > and
> > believed their principal was a strong leader.
>
> > More of these best practices are being implemented in elementary
> > and middle schools than in high schools. The report notes that the
> > greater the number of qualified teachers in a school, the better
> > students did and that the correlation was particularly true at
> > schools
> > with large numbers of economically disadvantaged students.- Hide quoted 
> > text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to