Hitler would be very proud of his friend and partners grandson george

On Jan 17, 6:51 am, "liberal mike532  !" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>  31 Similarities Between Hitler and President Bush
> by Edward 
> Jaynewww.dissidentvoice.orghttp://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles3/Jayne_Hitler-Bush.htm
>  When President Bush decided to invade Iraq, his spokesmen began
> comparing Saddam Hussein to Adolph Hitler, the most monstrous figure
> in modern history.  Everybody was therefore shocked when a high German
> bureaucrat turned the tables by comparing Bush himself with Hitler.
> As to be expected, she (the bureaucrat) was forced to resign because
> of her extreme disrespect for an American president.  However, the
> resemblance sticks--there are too many similarities to be ignored,
> some of which may be listed here.
>
> Like Hitler, President Bush was not elected by a majority, but was
> forced to engage in political maneuvering in order to gain office.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush began to curtail civil liberties in response to a
> well-publicized disaster, in Hitler s case the Reichstag fire, in
> Bush s case the 9-11 catastrophe.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush went on to pursue a reckless foreign policy without
> the mandate of the electorate and despite the opposition of most
> foreign nations.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush has increased his popularity with conservative
> voters by mounting an aggressive public relations campaign against
> foreign enemies.  Just as Hitler cited international communism to
> justify Germany s military buildup, Bush has used Al Qaeda and the so-
> called Axis of Evil to justify our current military buildup.
> Paradoxically none of the nations in this axis--Iraq, Iran and North
> Korea--have had anything to do with each other.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush has promoted militarism in the midst of economic
> recession (or depression as it was called during the thirties).  First
> he used war preparations to help subsidize defense industries
> (Halliburton, Bechtel, Carlyle Group, etc.) and presumably the rest of
> the economy on a trickle-down basis.  Now he turns to the very same
> corporations to rebuild Iraq, again without competitive bidding and at
> extravagant profit levels.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush displays great populist enthusiasm in his patriotic
> speeches, but primarily serves wealthy investors who subsidize his
> election campaigns and share with him their comfortable lifestyle.  As
> he himself jokes, he treats these individuals at the pinnacle of our
> economy as his true political base.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush envisages our nation s unique historic destiny
> almost as a religious cause sanctioned by God.  Just as Hitler did for
> Germany, he takes pride in his providential role in spreading his
> version of Americanism throughout the entire world.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush promotes a future world order that guarantees his
> own nation s hegemonic supremacy rather than cooperative harmony under
> the authority of the United Nations (or League of Nations).
>
> Like Hitler, Bush quickly makes and breaks diplomatic ties, and he
> offers generous promises that he soon abandons, as in the cases of
> Mexico, Russia, Afghanistan, and even New York City.  The same goes
> for U.S. domestic programs.  Once Bush was elected, many leaders of
> these programs learned to dread his making any kind of an appearance
> to praise their success, since this was almost inevitably followed by
> severe cuts in their budgets.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush scraps international treaties, most notably the Anti-
> Ballistic Missile Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention, the
> Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Convention on the Prohibition of
> Land Mines, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Kyoto Global Warming
> Accord, and the International Criminal Court.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush repeats lies often enough that they come to be
> accepted as the truth.  Bush and his spokesmen argued, for example,
> that they had taken every measure possible to avoid war, than an
> invasion of Iraq would diminish (not intensify) the terrorist threat
> against the U.S., that Iraq was linked with Al Qaeda, and that nothing
> whatsoever had been achieved by U.N. inspectors to warrant the
> postponement of U.S. invasion plans.  All of this was false.  They
> also insisted that Iraq hid numerous weapons it did not possess since
> the mid-190s, and they refused to acknowledge the absence of a nuclear
> weapons program in Iraq since the early nineties.  As perhaps to be
> expected, they indignantly accused others of deception and
> evasiveness.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush incessantly shifted his arguments to justify
> invading Iraq--from Iraq s WMD threat to the elimination of Saddam
> Hussein, to his supposed Al Qaeda connection, to the creation of Iraqi
> democracy in the Middle East as a model for neighboring states, and
> back again to the WMD threat.  As soon as one excuse for the war was
> challenged, Bush advanced to another, but only to shift back again at
> another time.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush and his cohorts emphasize the ruthlessness of their
> enemies in order to justify their own.  Just as Hitler cited the
> threat of communist violence to justify even greater violence on the
> part of Germany, the bush team justified the invasion of Iraq by
> emphasizing Hussein s crimes against humanity over the past twenty-
> five years.  However, these crimes were for the most part committed
> when Iraq was a client-ally of the U.S.  Our government supplied
> Hussein with illegal weapons (poison gas included), and there were
> sixty U.S. advisors in Iraq when these weapons were put to use (see NY
> Times, Aug. 18, 1992).  U.S. aid to Iraq was actually doubled
> afterwards despite disclaimers from Washington that our nation opposed
> their use.  President Reagan s special envoy Donald Rumsfeld
> personally informed Hussein of this one hundred percent increment
> during one of his two trips to Iraq at the time.  He also told Hussein
> not to take U.S. disclaimers seriously.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush takes pride in his status as a War President, and
> his global ambition makes him perhaps the most dangerous president in
> our nation s history, a rogue chief executive capable of waging any
> number of illegal preemptive wars.  He fully acknowledges his
> willingness to engage in wars of choice as well as wars of
> necessity.  Sooner or later this choice will oblige universal
> conscription as well as a full-scale war economy.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush continues to pursue war without cutting back on the
> peacetime economy.  Additional to unprecedented low interest rates
> bestowed by the Federal Reserve, he has actually cut federal taxes
> twice by substantial amounts, especially for the top one percent of
> U.S. taxpayers, while conducting an expensive invasion and an even
> more expensive occupation of a hostile nation.  As a result, President
> Clinton s $350 billion budget surplus has been reduced to a $450
> billion deficit, comprising an unprecedented $800 billion decline in
> less than four years.  At the same time the U.S. dollar has steadily
> dropped against currencies of both Europe and Japan.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush possesses a war machine much bigger and more
> effective than the military capabilities of other nations.  With the
> extra financing obliged by the defeat and occupation of Iraq, Bush now
> relies on a defense budget well in excess of the combined military
> expenditures of the rest of the world.  Moreover, the $416 billion
> defense package passed last week by Congress will probably need to be
> supplemented before the end of the year.
>
> Like Hitler, bush depends on an axis of collaborative allies, which he
> describes as a coalition of the willing, in order to give the
> impression of a broad popular alliance.  These allies include the U.K.
> as compared to Mussolini s Italy, and Spain and Bulgaria, as compared
> to, well, Spain and Bulgaria, both of which were aligned with Germany
> during the thirties and World War II.  As a result of their
> cooperation, Prime Minister Blair s diplomatic reputation has been
> ruined in England, and a surprising election defeat has produced an
> unfriendly government in Spain.  The Philippines have withdrawn their
> troops from Iraq to save the life of a hostage, and other defections
> can be expected in the near future.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush is willing to go to war over the objections of the
> U.N. (League of Nations).  His Iraq invasion was illegal and therefore
> a war crime as explained by Articles 41 and 42 of the U.N. Charter,
> which require two votes, not one, by the Security Council before any
> state takes such an action.  First a vote is needed to explore all
> possibilities short of warfare (in Iraq s case through the use of U.N.
> inspectors), and once this has been shown to be fruitless, a second
> vote is needed to permit military action.  U.S. and U.K. delegates at
> the Security Council prevented this second vote once it was plain they
> lacked a majority.  This was because other nations on the Security
> Council were satisfied with the findings of U.N. inspectors that no
> weapons of mass destruction had yet been found.  Minus this second
> vote, the invasion was illegal.  Bush also showed in the process that
> he has no qualms about bribing, bullying, and insulting U.N. members,
> even tapping their telephone lines.  This was done with undecided
> members of the Security Council as well as the U.N. Secretary General
> when the U.S.-U.K. resolution was debated preceding the invasion.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush launches unilateral invasions on a supposedly
> preemptive basis.  Just as Hitler convinced the German public to think
> of Poland as a threat to Germany in 1939 (for example in his Sept. 19
> speech), Bush wants Americans to think of Iraq as having been a
> potential threat to our national security--indeed as one of the
> instigators of the 9-11 attack despite a complete lack of evidence to
> support this claim.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush depends on a military strategy that features a
> shock and awe blitzkrieg beginning with devastating air strikes,
> then an invasion led by heavy armored columns.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush is willing to inflict high levels of bloodshed
> against enemy nations.  Between 20,000 and (more probably) 37,000 are
> now estimated to have been killed, as much as a ro-1 kill ratio
> compared to the more than 900 Americans killed.  In other words, for
> every U.S. fatality, probably as many as forty Iraqi have died.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush is perfectly willing to sacrifice life as part of
> his official duty.  This would be indicated by the unprecedented
> number of prisoners executed during his service as governor of Texas.
> Under no other governor in the history of the United States were so
> many killed.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush began warfare on a single front (Al Qaeda quartered
> in Afghanistan), but then expanded it to a second front with Iraq,
> only to be confronted with North Korea and Iran as potential third and
> fourth fronts.  Much the same thing happened to Hitler when he
> advanced German military operations from Spain to Poland and France,
> then was distracted by Yugoslavia before invading the USSR in 1941.
> Today, bush seems prevented by the excessive costs of the Iraqi
> debacle from going to war elsewhere if reelected, but not through any
> lack of desire.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush has no qualms about imposing regime change by
> installing Quisling-style client governments backed by a U.S. military
> occupation with both political and economic control entirely in the
> hands of Americans.  It is no surprise that Iyad Alawi, Iraq s current
> temporary prime minister, was once affiliated with the CIA and has
> been reliably reported by the Australian press to have executed six
> hooded prisoners with a handgun to their heads just a day or two
> before his appointment a couple weeks ago.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush curtails civil liberties in captive nations and
> depends on detention centers (i.e., concentration camps) such as a
> Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and any number of secret interrogation centers
> across the world.  Prisoners at the camps go unidentified and have no
> legal rights as ordinarily guaranteed by the Geneva Conventions.  They
> have also been detained indefinitely (for 2 years already at
> Guantanamo Bay), though there is mounting evidence that many are
> innocent of what they have been charged--some, for example, having
> been randomly seized by Northern Alliance troops in Afghanistan for an
> automatic bounty from U.S. commanders.  Moreover, many Iraqi prisoners
> have been tortured, in many instances just short of death.  Recent
> U.S. documents disclose that as many twenty have died while being
> tortured, and twenty others have died under unusual circumstances yet
> to be determined.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush uses the threat of enemies abroad to stir the
> fearful allegiance of the U.S. public.  For example, he features
> public announcements of possible terrorist attacks in order to
> override embarrassing news coverage or to crowd from headlines
> positive coverage of Democratic Party activities.  He also uses the
> threat of terrorism to justify extraordinary domestic powers granted
> by the Patriot Act.   Even the books we check out of public libraries
> can be kept on record by federal agents.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush depends on a propaganda machine to guarantee
> sympathetic news management.  In Hitler s case news coverage was
> totally dominated by Goebbels; in Bush s case reporters have been
> almost totally imbedded by both military spokesmen and wealthy media
> owners sympathetic with Bush.  The most obvious case is the Fox news
> channel, owned and controlled by Rupert Murdoch. Not surprisingly,
> recent polls indicate that the majority of Fox viewers still think
> Hussein played a role in the 9-11 attack.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush increasingly reduces the circle of aides he feels he
> can trust as his policies keep boomeranging at his own expense.  Just
> as Hitler ended up isolated in his headquarters, with few individuals
> granted access, Bush is now said to be limiting access primarily to
> Attorney General Ashcroft (who also talks with God on a regular basis)
> as well as Karl Rove, the Vice President, Karen Hughes, and a few
> others.  Both Secretary of State Powell and Secretary of Defense
> Rumsfeld are now said to be out of the loop.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush has become obsessed with his vision of conflict
> between good (U.S. patriotism) and evil (anti-Americanism.  Many in
> contact with the White House are said to be worried that he is
> beginning to lose touch with reality--perhaps resulting from the use
> of medication that seriously distorts his judgment.  Possibly
> symptomatic of this concern is the increasing number of disaffected
> government officials who leak embarrassing documents.
>
> Like Hitler, bush takes pleasure in the mythology of frontier
> justice.  As a youth Hitler read and memorized the western novels of
> Karl May, and Bush retains into his maturity his fascination with
> simplistic cowboy values.  He also exaggerates a cowboy twang despite
> his C-average elitist education at Andover, Yale, and Harvard.
>
> Like Hitler, Bush misconstrues Darwinism, in Hitler s case by treating
> the Aryan race as being superior on an evolutionary basis, in Bush s
> case by rejecting science for fundamentalist creationism.
>
> Of course countless differences may be listed between Hitler and
> President Bush, most of which are to the credit of Bush.
> Nevertheless, the resemblances listed here are striking, especially
> since Bush s first term in office must be compared with Hitler s
> performance as German Chancellor through the year 1937, preceding the
> chain of events immediately preceding World War II.  In any case,
> George W. Bush seems the worst and most dangerous U.S. president in
> recent memory (for me since Roosevelt)--if not in the entire history
> of the United States.
>
> Edward Jayne is a retired English professor with experience as a '60s
> activist. He can be contacted at: [email protected].
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to