I am reminded of Dr. Theodore Kaczynski's Manifesto here.......Ya'll might
remember him, he was commonly referred to as "The Unibomber".....
So, Robert???

I am assuming that what you are attempting to convey in this message,  is
that:

(1) We need a return to the "Fairness Doctrine" to keep folks from listening
to, "talk show rants and segways that currently plague" radio.

(2)  That the federal government needs to protect the, " relatively few
elite of the world's population" who have access to computers and forums
such as this one, (*e.g*.; like the members of this group, and folks like
us, because, we are being forced to listen to and witness:   (and I quote) :


 "[P]rejudiced, narrow minded, sectarian, ideas, inclusive of false
spiritualities, the evils of political dialectic, irrationality, false
ideals, and a vast number of damaging and destructive more trivial and often
naive attitudes and practices for the sake of a few against the many, those
existing means must now be directed to promote true ideals, preserve real
liberties, to facilitate genuine achievement and success rather than beating
down into the worst and lowest common denominators that only serve the
growth of crime and cynical despair, becoming the weapon they were meant to
become, for use against organized crime, against despair, against the lowest
common denominator, against what truly harms society"



And finally,

(3)  You advocate that we need to do away with anything that is mass
produced, and return to a more social, communal standard of living.  That we
as Americans (or "citizens of the world") should get rid of our
materialistic wants and needs, and return to:  (again, your words, not
mine):


 Rebuilding of the economy must seek to create new, more meaningful
opportunities. It must promote lasting values, in craftsmanship,
artisanship, carefulness, uniqueness, and rea enhancements of human life,
not  existing patterns of enforced isolation rewarded by short lived things,
equally disposable, in a depersonalized, existentially emptied, social
context.


In sum, I think what you are saying, is that you want our federal government
to become the protectors of us all, by doing away with any opposition to
"progressive" or "Moonbat" rhetoric and speech, on all mediums capable of
providing  information, in particular radio and the world wide web, and you
advocate that our system of economics should be based on the tenets of
Trotsky, Marx, Engels, and a half dozen or so other crackpots who advocated
a controlled, socialistic/communistic economic system that has failed
miserably throughout recorded history.

Two words, two syllables:


"No Thanks"

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<inline: UniBomber...Or Ralph Morpheal...You Be The Judge.jpg>>

Reply via email to