: Sen. Specter's Forced Delay of Eric Holder Offensive to Millions of
Americans
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1893

In today's The New York Times, it was reported that "Senate
Republicans on Wednesday forced a one-week delay in a vote on the
nomination of Eric H. Holder Jr. as attorney general, denying
President Obama the chance to have a key member of his national
security team in place as planned." (The New York Times 1/21/09)


Although Holder's confirmation is assured, the forced delay, led by
Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the ranking Republican on the
Judiciary Committee, is seen as offensive to millions of Americans.


Sen. Specter and his colleagues are using Clinton's pardon of Mark
Rich as an excuse to delay Holder's nomination. Specter has raised
the
same questions regarding the pardon of Mark Rich beyond beating a
dead
horse. Mr. Holder has given perfectly reasonable and reflective
explanations; nothing more can be asked or said about it.


If Senator Specter and his Republican colleagues believe that they're
acting on behalf of Americans who've been waiting for a true
constitutional lawyer such as Eric Holder to step in and restore the
Bill of Rights and the principle that "no one is above the law," they
are gravely mistaken.


Indeed, Sen. Specter should take a moment or two and replay the
Inaugural Address: Look at the more than two million people who stood
in the freezing cold weather for two days straight to wish their new
President well.


Sen. Specter's attempt to block Mr. Holder on dubious grounds is not
only offensive to President Obama, but also it is incredibly
offensive
to all the millions and millions of people who are supporting
President Obama after eight years of oppression, depression,
witnessing unspeakable violations of our laws, such as the practice
of
torture, impeachable offenses, all since the invasion of Iraq. Where
oh where was Sen. Specter when the Justice Department gave the stamp
of approval to torture detainees?


It raises suspicious questions: Why is Sen. Specter so intent on
delaying Holder's nomination? Could it be that Bush's Justice
Department has a lot to hide and they need more time to shred, shred,
and shred again the evidence of foul deeds?


For example, consider the case of Bradley J. Schlozman, a former
Justice Department official entrusted with enforcing civil rights
laws, who refused to hire lawyers whom he labeled as "commies" and
transferred another attorney for allegedly writing in "ebonics" and
benefiting from "an affirmative action thing," according to an
investigation released yesterday by internal watchdogs. (The
Washington Post 1/14/09)


Republicans have had it their way for eight long years and this
country suffered the consequences from their UNjust policies that
have
favored big polluting industries at the expense of the public's
health
and well being.


In the last two days, reports have been issued about the life-
threatening outbreaks of salmonella in some peanut butter products.
What the media is NOT telling the public is that Bush lifted over 400
health and safety regulations, favoring the corporations over the
public's health. There have been countless cases of salmonella in
this
country since Bush lifted essential regulations that were put in
place
to protect the public.


If Sen. Specter's decision to delay Eric Holder's nomination disturbs
you, then call his office (202/224-4254) and tell him to stand aside
and let President Obama do his work for the people. It's offensive to
hold back Holder during a time of urgent crisis when we must make the
necessary changes in our Justice Department, starting with restoring
our constitutional rights!



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to