hey numbnuts, read the constitution. no where does it say except for hilly taking less pay. it says you are forbidden from serving under these circumstances, period.
On Jan 30, 11:30 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > Since Bush said so. > > On Jan 30, 5:56 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > and since when is following the constitution being a moonbat, > > moonbat. oh wait, that's right, you libs prefer to pick and choose > > those parts that you can exploit, and ignore those parts you > > dislike. > > > On Jan 30, 6:47 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > talk about being a moonbat ! this is an old issue and has been > > > resolved but you keep on with your idiotic ranting about > > > it ...podna !. > > > > On Jan 30, 6:35 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > A State Department employee has filed a lawsuit today in federal court > > > > against newly sworn-in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claiming she > > > > is constitutionally ineligible to serve. > > >ion ut > > > > Judicial Watch, a public interest group that investigates and > > > > prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it is pursuing > > > > the complaint in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C, on behalf of > > > > U.S. Foreign Service Officer and State Department employee David C. > > > > Rodearmel. > > > > > Rodearmel, a resident of Virginia, maintains Clinton is > > > > constitutionally ineligible to serve as secretary of state and that he > > > > cannot serve under her because doing so would go against the oath he > > > > took as a foreign service officer in 1991 to "support and defend" and > > > > "bear true faith and allegiance" to the Constitution of the United > > > > States. > > > > > "This is not a partisan, political or personal issue," Rodearmel said > > > > in a statement. "I have faithfully served under six prior Secretaries > > > > of State of both parties, and under eight Presidents since first > > > > taking the oath to uphold the Constitution as a young Army officer > > > > cadet. … As a commissioned State Department Foreign Service Officer, a > > > > retired Army Reserve Judge Advocate Officer, and as a lawyer, I > > > > consider it my Constitutional duty to bring this case to the courts." > > > > > The constitutional quandary arises from a clause that forbids members > > > > of the Senate from being appointed to civil office, such as the > > > > secretary of state, if the "emoluments," or salary and benefits, of > > > > the office were increased during the senator's term. > > > > > The second clause of Article 1, Section 6, of the Constitution reads, > > > > "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was > > > > elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the > > > > United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof > > > > shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any > > > > Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House > > > > during his Continuance in Office." > > > > > According to the lawsuit, the "emoluments" of the office of secretary > > > > of state increased as many as three times since Clinton began her > > > > second, six-year Senate term in January 2007. On Jan. 1, 2007, the > > > > secretary of state's salary increased to $186,600. In 2008, it > > > > increased to $191,300, and on Jan. 1, 2009, it increased again to > > > > $196,700. > > > > >http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87451-Hide quoted > > > >text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
