Ohio mark, If memory serves me, "Traditional Marraige" was NOT on the ballot. There was no change in requested for that fine inststution. Prop 8 would have had "0" effect on it had it passed.
So what is your point ?? On Jan 31, 6:15 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote: > so according to you, these people have the right to be threatened, > receive death threats, and fear for their safety from the fags because > they support traditional marriage. you are the poster boy proving > that in fact you fools on the left truly are mentally challenged, and > indeed retarded. > > On Jan 31, 7:07 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Prop. 8 Campaign Can't Hide Donors' Nameshttp://www.truthout.org/013009O > > Bob Egelko, The San Francisco Chronicle: "Proposition 8 proponents' > > complaint that a California campaign-finance disclosure law has led > > to > > harassment of same-sex marriage opponents failed today to sway a > > federal judge, who refused to throw out the law or shield donors' > > names. Lawyers for Protect Marriage, sponsor of the constitutional > > amendment that won voter approval Nov. 4, said contributors have > > already faced consumer boycotts, picketing and even death threats > > after the state posted their names and other information in mandatory > > campaign reports."- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
