Liberals are more delusional the Conservatives.

Change we can all believe in Right! And I have a Brooklyn Bridge I’d
like to show you.

By Stephen Lendman

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 04, 2008

http://www.bestcyrano.org/THOMASPAINE/?p=739#more-739

Each election cycle, hope springs eternal. Candidates promise change
and voters buy it. Intelligent ones. People who know better or should.
The current campaign highlights it. A surge is building for Obama, not
for what he is. For what people think or hope he is - a populist,
progressive, man of the people, a new course for America.

After the final June 3 primaries and “rush of superdelegates,”
according to The New York Times, they’re stuck with him. The Times
reports that he crossed “over the threshold (to) the 2118 delegates
needed to be nominated….” Obama marked the occasion as his chance to
“bring a new and better day to America (as) the ‘Democratic’ nominee
for president of the United States of America.”

It’s not how John Pilger sees him. In a recent article, he calls him
America’s “great liberal hope.” He compares his campaign to Bobby
Kennedy’s in 1968 and says: “Both offer a false hope that they can
bring peace and racial harmony to all Americans.” Kennedy spoke of
“return(ing) government to the people” and giving “dignity and
justice” to the oppressed. “Obama is his echo” with familiar promises
of change, charting a new course, sweeping government reforms,
addressing people needs, and “ensur(ing) that the hopes and concerns
of average Americans speak louder in Washington than the hallway
whispers of high-priced lobbyists.”

He claims to be an up from the grassroots activist. In fact, he cashed
in on opportunism all the way - to the Illinois Senate in 1996. Then
after failing to win a US House seat, it was up a notch to the Senate
in 2005 after his November 2004 election. He promised hope but
delivered betrayal. He’s beholden to power and doesn’t relate well to
ordinary constituents who backed him, including his black community
base.

If he’s nominated and wins in November, Marc Crispin Miller’s “Fooled
Again” will apply but in this case to promises made, then broken.
Miller’s book refers to the stolen 2004 presidential election. Kerry
won big, Bush remained president, Kerry admitted to the author he knew
he’d been had, then disavowed he ever said it in reverse “profile of
courage” fashion.

An Obama victory will go Lincoln one better. It’ll prove that the
electorate can be fooled “all of the time” - at least enough of them
to matter. And that leaves out election fraud in an age when:

• candidates are pre-selected;

• big money owns them;

• independents are shut out;

• the media ignore them;

• they keep people uninformed;

• issues aren’t addressed;

• voter disenfranchisement is rife;

• machines do our voting;

• losers are declared winners; and

• not just for president. It’s democracy American-style, a long-
standing tradition, and Chicagoans know it well. They remember an
earlier mayor urging people to “vote early and often.” They also
recall the pol who “want(ed) to be buried in Chicago (when he died) so
(he could) stay active in politics.”

In an age of technological wonders, why not. The Democrat machine is
so entrenched, it hasn’t had real opposition since Republican mayor
“Big Bill” Thompson lost to Democrat Anton Cermak in 1931. And the
Daleys (father and son) practically own the office it’s controlled for
40 of the last 53 years with no visible contender in sight and a new
generation upcoming.

The only man truly WORTH voting for, assuming that our votes did
count, which is a mighty iffy proposition.

On the national level, it’s just as bad - a one party state according
to Gore Vidal: the Property or Monied Party with two wings. The
criminal class in Washington is bipartisan. Democrats are
interchangeable with Republicans. Differences between them are minor.
Not a dime’s worth to matter. Whoever wins in November, the outcome is
certain. Voters again will lose. They’ll get the best democracy money
can buy but none of it earmarked for them.

Wars of aggression won’t end. Repressive laws won’t be repealed.
Corruption will stay deeply embedded. Privatizing everything will be
de rigueur. Monied interests will be hugely rewarded. Militarizing and
annexing the continent will go forward. Voter interests will go
largely unaddressed. And promises made will again prove empty.

Obama’s Record - The Measure of the Man

He preaches change but supports the status quo. He’s beholden to power
as a stealth DLC member that’s essential for any Democrat aspirant. It
makes him gallingly disingenuous, deceitful to voters, and “safe” for
corporate supporters who back him. He says individual donors supply
most of his funding, that he gets none of it from lobbyists, and that
they won’t crowd out working Americans if he’s elected.

In fact, big money owns him. He raises over $1 million a day. Wall
Street lords love him. So do corporate law firms; other finance,
insurance and real estate interests; the health industry;
communications and electronics firms; various other businesses; and
the Center for Responsive Politics reports that his top five donors
are corporate lobbyists - the same ones he claims to take no money
from.

He preaches opposition to NAFTA and wants it renegotiated. It’s a
“charade” says Nader. “There’s no way he’ll touch NAFTA or WTO.” His
health care plan puts insurance companies in charge and lets Big
Pharma price-gouge consumers. He’s beholden to corporate interests.
“If he wins, his appointments will give “lobbies and PACs (what they)
want.” He knows how Washington works; was fully briefed to be sure;
and he “made his peace with that.” He’s a political animal like the
others. Big money is comforted, and why not. No one gets top
Washington jobs unless they’re “safe.” For president, it’s practically
a blood oath, and Obama qualifies.
He’s party line all the way, not a “transforming leader,” and his
running mate, Matt Gonzales, goes further. He calls his voting record
“uninspired.” Appalling would be more descriptive. While still in the
Illinois legislature, he opposed the Iraq war. Then as a 2004 US
Senate candidate, he switched and claimed “There’s not that much
difference between my position and George Bush’s….” When elected, he
proved it. He supported every defense budget and war supplemental and
as president will “expand and modernize the military.” He voted to
confirm Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State despite her falsifying
justification for war.
There’s more. He:

• supports Homeland Security funding; like the Patriot Act, it
centralizes unprecendented military and law enforcement authority
under the executive; it subverts constitutional rights and furthers
global dominance in the name of “national security;” it created the
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) that functions like a
national Gestapo;

• backed reauthorizing the Patriot Act in July 2005 with its police
state provisions;

• campaigned in 2006 for Joe Lieberman against anti-war candidate Ned
Lamont;

• supports permanent occupation of Iraq; stops just short of saying
it; refuses to back a timetable for withdrawal; and wants to add
100,000 combat troops to the military;

• caved to Israeli Lobby pressure; receptive to attacking Iran,
removing Hugo Chavez, but says he’ll talk to them first; then maybe
not; he’s double standard on most issues - rhetoric to voters;
assurances to backers;

• in a May 23 speech, showed deference to Miami’s Cuban exile
community; one source described him as “electrifying;” a year ago he
supported ending the embargo; no longer unless Cuba becomes a willing
client state;

• voted with Republicans for the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA); it
gives federal courts jurisdiction over fairer state ones for many
class-action lawsuits over $5 million; corporations wanted it; Obama
obliged;

• equivocates on controversial issues like “No Child Left Behind;”
it’s a corporate scheme to privatize education and end a 373 year
tradition; he says the law “demoralizes our teachers (but) the goals
of this law were the right ones” - translation: he supports ending
public education;

• opposed an amendment capping credit card interest rates at 30%; it
was wholly inadequate but would have set a precedent to lower them
further;

• supporting medical providers in wrongful injury cases;

• letting mining companies strip mine everything; practically steal
government lands to do it; and cheat taxpayers out of public revenues;

• voted for the Bush administration’s 2005 Energy Policy Act in spite
of criticizing it in campaign rhetoric; it was drafted in secret;
provides huge industry subsidies; $6 billion to Big Oil and Gas; and a
cornucopia of other industry handouts;

• backs nuclear power; loose industry regulation; $12 billion in
subsidies; and numerous other benefits to promote a dangerous
technology;

• harmful biofuels production and other agribusiness interests,
including multi-billion dollar subsidies;

• opposes universal single-payer national health care, the hundreds of
billions it would save, and the huge need for it among tens of
millions of uninsured and underinsured;

• claims opposition to NAFTA, but campaigned in 2004 for more deals
like it;

• voted against a 2005 Commerce Appropriations Bill amendment; it
would have disfavored offshoring jobs by stopping companies doing
business abroad from denying workers organizing rights, minimum wages,
and other protections;

• assured AIPAC he’s uncompromisingly pro-Israel; supports continued
annual funding; and backed off from earlier promises about a just end
to the conflict;

• supports the death penalty and brutish prison-industrial complex; it
affects his people mostly in the world’s largest gulag;

• voted for repressive immigration legislation; it enhances border
security; (selectively) penalizes employers; deploys National Guard
troops to the border; and imprisons and deports undocumented workers
without due process;

• voted to confirm Robert Gates as Defense Secretary, John Negroponte
as Director of National Intelligence, and Michael Chertoff as
Secretary of Homeland Security - a deplorable roguish threesome;

• voted against the Military Commissions Act of 2006 but supports
kangaroo court military tribunals for Guantanamo detainees;

• appointed billionaire Penny Pritzker as his campaign finance
chairperson; she and her family were involved in predatory lending
schemes, including subprime ones; she also served on the Board of the
failed Pritzker family-owned Superior Bank in Hinsdale, IL; because of
poor lending practices, sloppy bookkeeping and likely fraud, it cost
the FDIC $700 million and depositors $65 million;

• equivocates but his rhetoric and body language are clear; he
supports the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention
Act (S. 1959); it’s called the “thought crimes” act; it passed the
House overwhelmingly last October and awaits final resolution in the
Senate;

• firmly opposes impeaching Bush and Cheney, and

• on June 1 matched John Kerry with his own reverse “profile of
courage” act; he resigned from Chicago’s Trinity United Church of
Christ; it followed “controversy” over Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s
nobility; he spoke truths too “uncomfortable” for Obama to embrace; he
demurred at first and now is firm; political opportunism outweighs
righteousness as prime time campaign 2008 approaches;

This is the same JFK/RFK incarnate, a fresh new face, the “great
liberal hope,” the smooth-talking campaigner who understands who
butters his bread. The same goes for Clinton and McCain.


On Feb 1, 10:55 pm, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote:
>  What A Difference Ten Days Make . Thank God the GOP is out of
> power !http://www.truthout.org/013109Z
> Isaiah J. Poole, The Campaign for America's Future: "Consider how far
> we've come since January 20. On Thursday, the Senate followed the
> House in passing a reauthorization of a child health insurance bill
> that will mean 4 million more children will have access to health
> insurance. When the Congress passed similar legislation last year,
> then-President Bush vetoed the legislation - twice. This time,
> President Obama is expected to sign the bill into law next week.
> Increasing the number of working-class families who have health
> insurance for their children is just one of the significant victories
> progressives can lay claim to in just the first 10 days of the Obama
> administration."
>    Struggles over the the administration's economic recovery package,
> and the brutal snubbing Obama received from House Republicans in spite
> of what most progressives think were ill-advised compromises, have
> threatened to overshadow the sea-change that is unfolding inside the
> Beltway. It's wrong to let that happen. Instead, the change should be
> celebrated, defended and established as a foundation for the bolder
> policy steps that this administration must take in the days ahead.
>
>     The Positives So Far Are Sweeping:
>
> • An executive order that commits the United States to closing the
> international shame that is Guantanamo Bay, and that will finally mean
> that Guantanamo detainees will receive legal due process - and that
> the United States has returned to respecting the rule of law.
>
> • An executive order, and a clear statement from Obama's attorney
> general-designate Eric Holder, that reject the Bush administration's
> policy on torture.
>
> • Repeal of the Bush administration order that banned funding to
> international family planning organizations that supported legal
> abortions, which means that vital women's health services to poor
> countries will begin flowing again.
>
> • President Obama's signing on Thursday of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair
> Pay Act, which will finally allow victims of wage discrimination a
> fair chance in the courts to get the justice due them. Ledbetter, who
> lost a conservative Supreme Court ruling that she could not pursue a
> wage discrimination claim because of an impractical statute of
> limitations, was able to witness the White House signing.
>
> • A memorandum that allows California and several other states to
> impose tough auto-emissions standards, a move that a New York Times
> analysis suggests is the first step in a relationship with state
> governments of "progressive federalism."
>
> • Obama's interview with the Al-Arabiya television network, in which
> he pledged a relationship of mutual respect with the Arab world,
> backed with the reminder that he has direct Muslim familial ties. The
> interview has immediately opened possibilities for diplomatic progress
> with the Arab world on a host of issues.
>
> • Obama's visit to the Pentagon this week to make clear his intention
> to follow through on his campaign promise of a safe and responsible
> withdrawal from Iraq and a refocusing of resources on repairing the
> Bush administration's disastrous handling of the fight against al-
> Qaida in Afghanistan.
>
>     Then there is the economic recovery bill that dominated the news
> this week, a bill that my colleague Bernie Horn calls "the biggest and
> boldest progressive legislation in 40 years," even with its
> concessions to business interests and conservative whiners. This bill
> makes a significant down payment toward addressing both the short- and
> long-term challenges of rebuilding the economy and assuring that
> prosperity is more broadly spread than it was under President Bush.
>
>     Yes, Obama administration proposals have had to be nudged in a
> more progressive direction by allies in Congress and by activist
> groups, and that will continue to be the case. But let's also
> appreciate how much change is already beginning to happen.
> Conservatives are certainly noticing, and if we are not careful to
> guard and build upon the victories that we are winning, it will not
> take long for us to be dragged back into much darker times.
> »

On Feb 1, 10:55 pm, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote:
>  What A Difference Ten Days Make . Thank God the GOP is out of
> power !http://www.truthout.org/013109Z
> Isaiah J. Poole, The Campaign for America's Future: "Consider how far
> we've come since January 20. On Thursday, the Senate followed the
> House in passing a reauthorization of a child health insurance bill
> that will mean 4 million more children will have access to health
> insurance. When the Congress passed similar legislation last year,
> then-President Bush vetoed the legislation - twice. This time,
> President Obama is expected to sign the bill into law next week.
> Increasing the number of working-class families who have health
> insurance for their children is just one of the significant victories
> progressives can lay claim to in just the first 10 days of the Obama
> administration."
>    Struggles over the the administration's economic recovery package,
> and the brutal snubbing Obama received from House Republicans in spite
> of what most progressives think were ill-advised compromises, have
> threatened to overshadow the sea-change that is unfolding inside the
> Beltway. It's wrong to let that happen. Instead, the change should be
> celebrated, defended and established as a foundation for the bolder
> policy steps that this administration must take in the days ahead.
>
>     The Positives So Far Are Sweeping:
>
> • An executive order that commits the United States to closing the
> international shame that is Guantanamo Bay, and that will finally mean
> that Guantanamo detainees will receive legal due process - and that
> the United States has returned to respecting the rule of law.
>
> • An executive order, and a clear statement from Obama's attorney
> general-designate Eric Holder, that reject the Bush administration's
> policy on torture.
>
> • Repeal of the Bush administration order that banned funding to
> international family planning organizations that supported legal
> abortions, which means that vital women's health services to poor
> countries will begin flowing again.
>
> • President Obama's signing on Thursday of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair
> Pay Act, which will finally allow victims of wage discrimination a
> fair chance in the courts to get the justice due them. Ledbetter, who
> lost a conservative Supreme Court ruling that she could not pursue a
> wage discrimination claim because of an impractical statute of
> limitations, was able to witness the White House signing.
>
> • A memorandum that allows California and several other states to
> impose tough auto-emissions standards, a move that a New York Times
> analysis suggests is the first step in a relationship with state
> governments of "progressive federalism."
>
> • Obama's interview with the Al-Arabiya television network, in which
> he pledged a relationship of mutual respect with the Arab world,
> backed with the reminder that he has direct Muslim familial ties. The
> interview has immediately opened possibilities for diplomatic progress
> with the Arab world on a host of issues.
>
> • Obama's visit to the Pentagon this week to make clear his intention
> to follow through on his campaign promise of a safe and responsible
> withdrawal from Iraq and a refocusing of resources on repairing the
> Bush administration's disastrous handling of the fight against al-
> Qaida in Afghanistan.
>
>     Then there is the economic recovery bill that dominated the news
> this week, a bill that my colleague Bernie Horn calls "the biggest and
> boldest progressive legislation in 40 years," even with its
> concessions to business interests and conservative whiners. This bill
> makes a significant down payment toward addressing both the short- and
> long-term challenges of rebuilding the economy and assuring that
> prosperity is more broadly spread than it was under President Bush.
>
>     Yes, Obama administration proposals have had to be nudged in a
> more progressive direction by allies in Congress and by activist
> groups, and that will continue to be the case. But let's also
> appreciate how much change is already beginning to happen.
> Conservatives are certainly noticing, and if we are not careful to
> guard and build upon the victories that we are winning, it will not
> take long for us to be dragged back into much darker times.
> »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to