Justice Dept. Under Obama Is Preparing for Doctrinal Shift in Policies
of Bush Years
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/02/us/politics/02justice.html?nl=pol&e...
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department, probably more than any other
agency here, is bracing for a broad doctrinal shift in policies from
those of the Bush administration, department lawyers and Obama
administration officials say.

Eric H. Holder Jr., whom the Senate is expected to confirm on Monday
as the nation’s 82nd attorney general, plans to take the oath of
office that evening to demonstrate a quick start, which will include
overseeing the creation of a new detention policy for terrorism
suspects.


Mr. Holder will have to contend with that and other issues rapidly.
Lawyers inside and outside the department say he will face crushing
time constraints. Chief among them is a pledge by President Obama to
close the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, within a year.
Mr. Holder and a department task force must find a solution to the
question of what to do with the remaining prisoners there and any
apprehended in the future.


“This will be a sea change of what went on before,” said an Obama
administration lawyer, noting that the principal authority over
detention policies will move from the Defense Department under the
Bush administration to the Justice Department.


Under Mr. Obama’s recent executive order, the Justice Department will
be required to review the files of the 245 detainees at Guantánamo
and
draw up a proposal on their fate that will fulfill the pledge to
close
the facility.


“The idea that it has to be closed within a year will drive the
timing
of many things,” said the Obama administration lawyer, who spoke on
the condition of anonymity because Mr. Holder had not yet taken
office.


Mr. Holder will also have to make several quick decisions because of
court-imposed deadlines. And he will have to do so with many of the
senior positions in the department not yet filled.


The department has to decide by next month whether it will reverse
course from the Bush administration, which had repeatedly invoked the
so-called state secrets doctrine to shut down legal challenges to
several lawsuits dealing with national security. Officials also face
a
February deadline on whether to extend habeas corpus rights to
detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.


“I can’t imagine a more challenging time to come in as attorney
general,” said Walter Dellinger, a legal scholar who was an acting
solicitor general in the Clinton administration. “The number of legal
issues left behind to be resolved is really staggering.”


In the Justice Department, there is considerable restiveness as
employees await new direction. The civil rights division, which had
been reshaped in a conservative direction under President George W.
Bush, is ripe for sharp change, administration officials said.


“Many of us cannot wait for the changes,” said one career lawyer in
the division, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the
atmosphere.


The lawyer said there were expectations that the division would be
restored to its historic role of largely enforcing prohibitions
against racial and ethnic discrimination. Under the Bush
administration, the division significantly diminished its involvement
in those areas and shifted resources to fighting instances of
religious discrimination.


Several Bush political appointees in the civil rights division have
recently resigned. But some of the Bush policies were enforced with
alacrity by nonpolitical career lawyers who saw their careers
flourish. “A lot of us are waiting to see what happens to them now,”
the lawyer said.


The shift is expected to be more stark than that of a transition from
one party to another. It may resemble the start of the Reagan
administration, with its promise of wide philosophical change to be
put into effect by a cadre of enthusiastic outsiders and academics,
whose views on how to run the department have simmered after years of
watching from the outside.


The case dealing with the state secrets doctrine, which allows the
government to rebuff lawsuits by invoking national security concerns,
involves al-Haramain Islamic Foundation. A federal trial judge in San
Francisco ruled that the government could not invoke the doctrine to
block a lawsuit by al-Haramain, which has asserted that the
government
illegally listened in on its conversations.


The Bush administration used the doctrine to block more than two
dozen
lawsuits. In timing that was a bit of a surprise, the Justice
Department lawyers who have handled the lawsuit filed a motion with
the court an hour before Inauguration Day that held to the same
position.


Some Obama administration figures regarded the filing before midnight
on Jan. 19 as a rear-guard action to make it more difficult to
reverse
course.


The Justice Department has to file a new brief by Feb. 13. Jon B.
Eisenberg, who represents al-Haramain, said the schedule meant that
“Holder and company have to decide pretty quickly if they want to
keep
opposing this case with the state secrets doctrine.”


The case also provides an opportunity to have a court assess the Bush
administration’s domestic wiretapping program.


The Justice Department under Mr. Holder would also have to take a
stand soon in a case involving four former Guantánamo detainees who
sued former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and others for
damages they say they had suffered as a result of torture and
religious persecution at the facility. In December, the Supreme Court
revived the lawsuit and asked a federal appeals court to revisit its
earlier action in dismissing the suit in light of the justices’
ruling
that Guantánamo prisoners could challenge their detentions in federal
court.


The Supreme Court also granted the Justice Department a 30-day delay,
until March 23, to say where it stood in the case of Ali al-Marri.
The
Bush administration has made the far-reaching claim that it may
indefinitely hold Mr. Marri, a legal resident of the United States,
on
suspicion of terrorism in a military brig without charging him with a
crime.


The new administration is also supposed to decide by Feb. 20 what
position to take on whether detainees at the Bagram prison in
Afghanistan should be allowed to challenge their detentions in
federal
court, as Guantánamo detainees can.


While the Justice Department has rapidly grown in recent decades to
more than 110,000 employees, there are only about 150 spots for
political appointees who will steer policy. Only about 21 have begun
work. Several of the most senior of the political appointees require
confirmation by the Senate, and Mr. Holder was the first to be


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to