Any quote from any signed covenant or agreement that proves that is
welcome. Please forward them, I'm sure Keith would be as happy to
recieve them as I would. Our opinion is based in the written and
legally interpreted (competent court of jurisdiction) law; Not based
on the opinions of organizations that have an agenda to fill.

I will NOT hold my breath as I personally KNOW there are none. Happy Hunting.

On 2/11/09, AmericanBuilt.us <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> BOTH of your positions are contrary to fact AND contrary to reports by
> UNWRA, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and more sources.
>
> BOTH of you , mark & keith, CONSTANTLY resort to ad hominem - because
> your positions are WEAK.
>
> and regardless...BOTH of you are PROTECTING WAR CRIMINALS - and
> therefore guilty of treason in my book (whether out of ignorance or
> intentionally).
>
> maybe you should stop eating THEIR 'pudding' and actually READ the
> ingredients list...
>
> "a new PERLE harbor" = "dancing israelis"
> http://americanbuilt.us/war-criminals/
>
> On Feb 10, 5:38 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As I said, you do not get it. Proof of Keiths position was offered and once
> > again you CHOOSE to ignore the evidence as it is couunter productive to your
> > own position.
> >
> > Emotional revisionists are the enemis of all peoples as they refuse the
> > truth when it is handed to them. They  are the ones that send the young men
> > and and women to war while waving a flag and screaming about Patriotism and
> > naming those who would think first, traitors.
> >
> > The proof is ALWAYS in the pudding, yet seldom in the ingredients.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:25 PM, AmericanBuilt.us 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 9, 7:47 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >  Hey American Built, Since you like You Tube so much, here are a couple
> > > for
> > > > your viewing enjoyment:
> >
> > > great use of as hominem as a last resort debate tactic, keith.
> >
> > > maybe when your pals (the WAR CRIMINALS listed in THIS THREAD) go to
> > > court, they can use this evidence to prove their innocence. it is
> > > OBVIOUS that THEY are not guilty of war crimes because it was
> > > OBVIOUSLY not the only crime ever committed in the history of the
> > > world. it makes perfect sense...to the criminally insane.
> >
> > > thanks for the vids - lol. here are 60 for you to contemplate, too:
> >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=8B91AA508FE59017
> >
> > --
> > Mark M. Kahle,  ,www.filacoffee.com
> >
>


-- 
Mark M. Kahle,  ,
www.filacoffee.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to