Do you know how many times I have made this exact statement? I could not have one, but I cannot make that decision for someone else, especially when I don't know the circumstances.
On Feb 11, 9:22 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote: > "I would have never opted for an abortion" > That's the important point that so many miss in the abortion debate... > it's your choice. Simply because a person is pro-choice does not mean > they are pro-abortion. And liberals don't sit around planning > abortions all day long either! > > On Feb 11, 11:04 am, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sorry, but I would have never opted for an abortion, regardless of the > > disability of my child, and I agree that the people involved in the > > death of the child in Florida need to be held accountable. > > > And I am a liberal. > > > That being said, and back on topic - to me, this woman does not > > deserve celebrity status; she deserves a mental evaluation. I don't > > care if someone wants a big family; their choice, as long as they can > > take care of them. In this case, I seriously doubt she can, and I > > have a problem with that. > > > On Feb 10, 1:03 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The breaking of her water had nothing to do with Trig having Down's > > > Syndrome- that had already been determined and accepted. And there is > > > often a lapse between the breaking of water and delivery. You are > > > simply using this as another aspersion to fight your sick crush on > > > this woman. Of course a lefty Liberal would have opted for a late term > > > abortion- like the recent abortion where the baby was alive but the > > > abortionist killed the baby anyway. > > > > On Feb 9, 2:20 am, "liberal mike532 !" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > i don't have the link for caribou barbies speech in Tex but you could > > > > google it > > > > > On Feb 8, 2:21 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > We obviously have an snag in communications on this subject, Mike! :-) > > > > > Are we talking about Sarah or Bristol? Don't recall Bristol > > > > > speeches.Was Sarah giving speeches in TX in April? Do you have a > > > > > link? > > > > > > On Feb 8, 4:25 am, "liberal mike532 !" <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > palins water broke in Texas and she finished her speech then took an > > > > > > eight hour flight back to Alaska before even talking to a doctor . > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 4:59 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I googled this and could find no mention of this story about > > > > > > > Bristol, > > > > > > > mike. Do you have a link? > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 7:29 am, "liberal mike532 !" <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > child abuse ? no i don't think so . now putting your kid at > > > > > > > > risk by > > > > > > > > flying 8 hours to get back to alaska while in labor is child > > > > > > > > abuse ! > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 8:27 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Palin is in office! She is a Governor. Ashley Judd is an > > > > > > > > > idiot if you > > > > > > > > > care to take up that topic.// This woman is running for > > > > > > > > > celebrity/ > > > > > > > > > publicity/therapy for her lonliness/depression, etc. It's > > > > > > > > > child abuse > > > > > > > > > carried to a new level of creativity in my opinion to balance > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > teeter-totter of multiple abortions used as birth control. > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 7:02 am, "liberal mike532 !" > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > palin as running for office this women isn't > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 7:09 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Is she getting different treatment than Sarah Palin and > > > > > > > > > > > her daughter? > > > > > > > > > > > I think so. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 5:01 am, "liberal mike532 !" > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes and it is coming from you travis ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 5:40 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > She draws disability for a back injury yet she is > > > > > > > > > > > > > strong enough to carry > > > > > > > > > > > > > babies? there is some BS here somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:35 AM, liberal mike532 ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > travis you have shown yourself to be a lying piece > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of scum ! no where > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has it even been hinted at that this women cheated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone out of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 165,000 in welfare payments . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ Suleman, who now has 14 children, told doctors > > > > > > > > > > > > > > she battled with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > depression for years after she was injured in a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > riot in 1999 at the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state mental hospital where she worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The doctors' reports were included in more than 300 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pages of documents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > released to The Associated Press by the state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Division of Workers' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Compensation on the same day NBC released excerpts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Suleman's first > > > > > > > > > > > > > > interview since giving birth last month. Among > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other things, the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > documents reveal that Suleman collected more than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $165,000 in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > disability payments between 2002 and 2008 for an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > injury she said left > > > > > > > > > > > > > > her in near-constant pain and helped end her > > > > > > > > > > > > > > marriage.] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i am getting really tired of your racists remarks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and attacks ! WNCS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is there a board rule against using a slanderous > > > > > > > > > > > > > > title to a thread ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if there is could you please make a ruling on this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 5, 11:09 pm, Travis <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Travis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: 2009/2/5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Records: Octuplets ho mom cheated govt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for $165,000 in welfare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,488627,00.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *~@):~{> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
