From: Travis
Subject: Obama to vets: Pay for your own injuries!
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009,


http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/veterans.health.insurance/index.html
 Senators slam plan for wounded vets to use private insurance

   - Story Highlights
   - Obama team considering plan in which vets would use private insurance
   for wounds
   - No official proposal to create such a program has been announced
   publicly
   - Veterans organizations have been lobbying Congress to oppose the idea
   - Lawmakers say plan would be rejected if it goes to Congress
   - Next Article in Politics
ยป<http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/12/second.stimulus/index.html?iref=nextin>

      By Adam Levine
CNN
 [image: Decrease font] [image: Decrease font]
[image: Enlarge font] [image: Enlarge font]
*WASHINGTON (CNN)* -- Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki
*confirmed*Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a
controversial plan to
make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private
insurance.
 [image: Lawmakers say they'd reject a proposal to make veterans pay for
treatment of war wounds with private insurance.]  Lawmakers say they'd
reject a proposal to make veterans pay for treatment of war wounds with
private insurance.
But the proposal would be "dead on arrival" if it's sent to Congress, Sen.
Patty Murray, D-Washington, said.
Murray used that blunt terminology when she told Shinseki that the idea
would not be acceptable and would be rejected if formally proposed. Her
remarks came during a hearing before the Senate Committee on Veterans
Affairs about the 2010 budget.
No official proposal to create such a program has been announced publicly,
but veterans groups wrote a pre-emptive letter last week to *President Obama
* <http://topics.cnn.com/topics/barack_obama> voicing their opposition to
the idea after hearing the plan was under consideration.
The groups also cited an increase in "third-party collections" estimated in
the 2010 budget proposal -- something they said could be achieved only if
the Veterans Administration started billing for service-related injuries.
Asked about the proposal, Shinseki said it was under "consideration."
"A final decision hasn't been made yet," he said.
Currently, veterans' private insurance is charged only when they receive
health care from the VA for medical issues that are not related to service
injuries, like getting the flu.
Charging for service-related injuries would violate "a sacred trust,"
Veterans of Foreign Wars spokesman Joe Davis said. Davis said the move would
risk private health care for veterans and their families by potentially
maxing out benefits paying for costly war injury treatments.
 Don't Miss

   - *Vets object to billing private insurance for service
injuries*<http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/03/vets.health.care/index.html>
   - *12,000 U.S. troops out of Iraq by fall, military
says*<http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/03/08/iraq.troop.withdrawal/index.html>

A second senator, North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, said he agreed
that the idea should not go forward.
"I think you will give that up" as a revenue stream if it is included in
this April's budget, Burr said.
Murray said she'd already discussed her concerns with the secretary the
previous week.
"I believe that veterans with service-connected injuries have already paid
by putting their lives on the line," Murray said in her remarks. "I don't
think we should nickel and dime them for their care."
Eleven of the most prominent veterans organizations have been lobbying
Congress to oppose the idea. In the letter sent last week to the president,
the groups warned that the idea "is wholly unacceptable and a total
abrogation of our government's moral and legal responsibility to the men and
women who have sacrificed so much."
The groups included The American Legion, Disabled American Veterans,
Military Order of the Purple Heart, Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United
States, and Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.

At the time, a White House spokesman would neither confirm nor deny the
option was being considered. E-mail to a
friend<http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/veterans.health.insurance/index.html#>
[image:
E-mail to a friend]






-- 
*~@):~{>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to