Personally, I would not sign any UN treaty. On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> 157 have signed. The end result would simply be equality. > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>wrote: > >> It has been a long time since I looked into this treaty, (since around >> 2002) and my recollection was that in principle, it was a good idea, but >> there are things that are not beneficial to our national interests.....I am >> just not boned up on the treaty enough to speak knowlegeably, and I need to >> be. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:02 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> Isn't your legal system based on this ?? Doesn't your constitution >>> literally scream out on this issue ?? Are not most federal suits >>> brought by individuals about this very theme ?/ >>> >>> Fuck..... it is suddenly traitorious to be "EQUAL" And you wonder what >>> is wrong with Gringolandia. >>> >>> On Mar 12, 6:07 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > From: Travis >>> > Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2009 >>> > Subject: LOST and Found: Senate Moves Toward Ratification of U.N. >>> > >>> > http://blacklistednews.com/?news_id=3605 >>> > >>> > this is traitorious. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > *~@):~{> >>> >>> >>> -- *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
